S1M — CS2 Stats

RU76561198196518681[U:1:236252953]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,790Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.3 StrongSupport

FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87

Positioning68

Utility86

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT58–42Last 10058%Win rateWLWWWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim8.7

Aggression3.4

Utility8.6

Positioning6.8

Opening Duels1.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; higher utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Utility. Utility score of 86 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 11% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7

Positioning6.8

Utility8.6

Mechanics7.8

Opening Duels3.6

Win Impact5.0

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time537ms+4ms

first ⅓ avg 534ms → last ⅓ avg 537ms

Headshot accuracy23.4%−2.3%

first ⅓ avg 25.7% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — anubis 13–3

13–0Biggest win — ancient

7Longest win streak

11–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 75% over 8vertigoWeakest map · 46% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	B	27	14–13	52%	0.03
anubis	A	23	14–9	61%	0.02
vertigo	B	13	6–7	46%	0.00
mirage	A	10	6–4	60%	0.04
nuke	S	9	6–3	67%	0.02
overpass	S	8	6–2	75%	0.04
inferno	A	5	3–2	60%	0.01
dust2	A	5	3–2	60%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (46% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

7,293Matches

51%Win rate

1.28Avg K/D

—ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	161	54%	1.30	17.3
Anubis	128	52%	1.25	16.0
Nuke	64	58%	1.37	17.2
Overpass	60	57%	1.25	18.2
Vertigo	52	54%	1.35	18.7
Mirage	33	45%	1.14	19.0
Inferno	24	50%	1.14	17.1
Dust2	11	45%	1.30	19.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.6%Headshot accuracy

39.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.3%Spray accuracy

85.0%Counter-strafing

9.6°Preaim

528msReaction time

11.1%T opening success

58.8%CT opening success

0.66Enemies flashed / flash

17.1%Flash assists

12.87HE damage / grenade

6.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 11.1112% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

46% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategy →Vertigo grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	13–4	0.05	35%	11 Jun →
vertigo	3–13	-0.08	17%	4 May →
inferno	13–4	-0.02	29%	27 Apr →
overpass	13–6	0.06	16%	3 Apr →
vertigo	13–9	0.04	18%	2 Apr →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	13%	29 Mar →
ancient	13–8	0.01	23%	10 Mar →
ancient	13–16	0.07	19%	10 Mar →
anubis	13–6	0.07	41%	9 Mar →
anubis	13–10	0.10	22%	9 Mar →
overpass	8–13	-0.03	26%	8 Mar →
vertigo	5–13	-0.04	31%	8 Mar →
vertigo	5–13	-0.04	27%	8 Mar →
anubis	7–13	-0.02	29%	8 Mar →
nuke	10–13	0.04	21%	6 Mar →
vertigo	13–2	0.11	15%	6 Mar →
anubis	11–13	-0.01	15%	5 Mar →
ancient	13–5	0.05	14%	5 Mar →
ancient	13–8	0.05	25%	3 Mar →
ancient	13–7	0.11	23%	3 Mar →
anubis	13–3	-0.00	11%	3 Mar →
vertigo	3–13	-0.08	29%	3 Mar →
ancient	14–16	0.03	27%	3 Mar →
dust2	14–16	0.05	20%	2 Mar →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	17%	1 Mar →
inferno	13–8	0.05	27%	29 Feb →
ancient	8–13	0.03	31%	29 Feb →
ancient	11–13	0.05	23%	29 Feb →
nuke	13–8	0.03	27%	29 Feb →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	12%	29 Feb →
ancient	14–16	-0.04	38%	29 Feb →
mirage	13–11	0.04	11%	29 Feb →
mirage	16–14	0.07	41%	28 Feb →
inferno	1–13	-0.04	11%	28 Feb →
dust2	6–13	-0.07	18%	28 Feb →
anubis	13–6	0.07	35%	28 Feb →
overpass	13–10	0.06	13%	28 Feb →
mirage	5–13	0.03	30%	28 Feb →
dust2	13–9	0.08	24%	26 Feb →
dust2	13–11	0.10	26%	25 Feb →
overpass	16–12	0.07	24%	25 Feb →
ancient	13–8	0.07	9%	25 Feb →
anubis	13–8	-0.04	24%	22 Feb →
nuke	13–6	-0.06	25%	19 Feb →
anubis	13–7	0.01	15%	18 Feb →
vertigo	10–13	0.03	22%	18 Feb →
anubis	6–13	-0.07	19%	18 Feb →
mirage	13–11	0.07	29%	18 Feb →
vertigo	13–11	-0.05	23%	17 Feb →
vertigo	13–7	0.01	35%	17 Feb →
anubis	13–7	0.03	48%	17 Feb →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	21%	17 Feb →
anubis	13–6	0.07	42%	17 Feb →
anubis	14–16	0.02	22%	17 Feb →
ancient	6–13	0.03	17%	17 Feb →
overpass	9–13	0.11	16%	17 Feb →
anubis	9–13	-0.03	26%	17 Feb →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	15%	17 Feb →
anubis	13–3	0.17	24%	17 Feb →
nuke	13–8	-0.02	21%	17 Feb →
anubis	13–9	0.03	19%	15 Feb →
vertigo	13–9	-0.04	27%	15 Feb →
mirage	13–11	0.03	26%	14 Feb →
overpass	16–13	0.04	29%	14 Feb →
ancient	8–13	-0.04	27%	13 Feb →
mirage	11–13	0.02	37%	9 Feb →
inferno	13–10	0.07	21%	9 Feb →
overpass	13–11	0.01	16%	9 Feb →
vertigo	15–19	0.00	23%	9 Feb →
anubis	11–13	0.09	15%	8 Feb →
anubis	13–3	0.05	35%	8 Feb →
inferno	11–13	-0.00	26%	7 Feb →
mirage	13–11	0.09	35%	6 Feb →
ancient	13–10	0.04	12%	6 Feb →
vertigo	13–4	0.14	25%	5 Feb →
ancient	1–13	0.01	39%	5 Feb →
ancient	13–11	0.10	24%	4 Feb →
anubis	5–13	-0.06	23%	4 Feb →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	26%	2 Feb →
anubis	13–11	0.06	24%	2 Feb →
nuke	10–13	0.05	31%	2 Feb →
dust2	16–14	0.06	23%	1 Feb →
nuke	19–15	-0.04	20%	31 Jan →
ancient	4–13	-0.05	21%	29 Jan →
ancient	13–4	0.11	28%	29 Jan →
ancient	13–5	0.01	16%	29 Jan →
mirage	13–7	0.03	27%	28 Jan →
vertigo	8–13	0.00	44%	28 Jan →
mirage	9–13	0.01	26%	28 Jan →
nuke	10–13	0.01	38%	27 Jan →
ancient	13–0	0.16	11%	27 Jan →
anubis	10–13	-0.07	35%	27 Jan →
nuke	13–10	0.04	27%	27 Jan →
anubis	6–13	-0.04	29%	26 Jan →
ancient	13–2	0.02	25%	26 Jan →
ancient	13–8	0.05	28%	24 Jan →
anubis	13–7	-0.00	20%	24 Jan →
nuke	13–2	0.17	33%	24 Jan →
ancient	13–9	-0.00	21%	23 Jan →
overpass	13–10	0.02	22%	22 Jan →