󠀡󠀡 — CS2 Stats

76561198196362323[U:1:236096595]

2,419Tracked matches45%Win rate2022Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPassive Rifler

FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84

Positioning52

Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–48–2Last 10050%Win rateWLLLWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.4

Aggression4.4

Utility6.1

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels2.3

Clutch4.8

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.79 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4

Positioning5.2

Utility6.1

Mechanics6.8

Opening Duels2.5

Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time608ms+34ms

first ⅓ avg 573ms → last ⅓ avg 608ms

Headshot accuracy25.2%+4.3%

first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 25.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — nuke 13–2

13–1Biggest win — overpass

7Longest win streak

8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 65% over 17dust2Weakest map · 33% over 27

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	D	27	9–18	33%	-0.00
mirage	B	26	14–12	54%	0.01
nuke	S	17	11–6	65%	0.04
inferno	B	10	5–5	50%	0.01
ancient	C	8	3–5	38%	-0.02
anubis	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.01
cache	—	4	3–1	75%	0.06
overpass	—	4	3–1	75%	0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 27). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

329Matches

58%Win rate

1.29Avg K/D

91.9ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win

32%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	45	64%	1.36	18.9
Dust2	28	61%	1.33	22.3
Ancient	22	73%	1.27	19.4
Anubis	15	47%	1.28	19.1
Inferno	14	79%	1.57	18.1
Nuke	9	78%	1.54	24.7
Vertigo	7	57%	1.02	15.3
Train	3	33%	1.26	18.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.9%Headshot accuracy

38.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.3%Spray accuracy

80.4%Counter-strafing

9.0°Preaim

601msReaction time

28.3%T opening success

49.8%CT opening success

0.79Enemies flashed / flash

14.8%Flash assists

7.59HE damage / grenade

4.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.3222% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 27 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–10	-0.01	11%	28 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	45%	27 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.06	15%	26 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	19%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.05	29%	14 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.03	11%	6 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.08	20%	5 Aug →
nuke	0–13	0.00	100%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–4	-0.00	21%	26 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.10	32%	25 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.03	28%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.04	30%	23 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.04	20%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.01	25%	5 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	14%	5 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.03	28%	13 Jun →
inferno	3–13	0.04	22%	5 Jun →
dust2	6–13	0.03	12%	5 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	16%	4 Jun →
inferno	9–1	0.08	25%	3 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.04	23%	2 Jun →
mirage	9–13	0.05	21%	30 May →
ancient	11–13	0.01	25%	28 May →
nuke	13–3	0.11	18%	28 May →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	12%	27 May →
mirage	13–11	0.00	9%	16 May →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	19%	16 May →
inferno	9–13	0.04	34%	13 May →
nuke	13–2	0.15	42%	13 May →
dust2	11–13	0.01	38%	12 May →
nuke	13–7	0.08	30%	12 May →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	20%	12 May →
nuke	6–13	0.01	19%	12 May →
nuke	13–6	0.02	24%	11 May →
nuke	13–8	0.06	25%	10 May →
mirage	13–11	0.01	30%	9 May →
dust2	16–14	0.06	25%	9 May →
ancient	6–13	-0.04	20%	9 May →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	19%	8 May →
dust2	11–13	0.03	18%	8 May →
overpass	9–13	-0.01	18%	8 May →
mirage	8–13	0.04	24%	7 May →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	24%	6 May →
anubis	9–13	-0.01	10%	6 May →
mirage	5–13	0.07	13%	5 May →
dust2	9–13	0.05	27%	5 May →
nuke	12–16	-0.01	30%	4 May →
dust2	13–10	0.00	22%	4 May →
mirage	13–5	-0.02	21%	4 May →
inferno	6–13	0.01	20%	4 May →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	37%	4 May →
ancient	9–13	-0.03	21%	4 May →
inferno	10–13	-0.06	32%	3 May →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	32%	3 May →
mirage	0–13	-0.09	22%	3 May →
dust2	15–15	-0.03	19%	3 May →
mirage	13–5	0.02	15%	3 May →
inferno	16–14	-0.02	17%	3 May →
overpass	13–1	0.05	16%	3 May →
dust2	10–13	-0.05	19%	2 May →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	33%	2 May →
ancient	0–3	-0.12	0%	2 May →
mirage	13–3	0.10	10%	2 May →
ancient	13–3	0.03	21%	2 May →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	32%	2 May →
mirage	13–4	-0.09	23%	2 May →
inferno	13–7	0.01	26%	2 May →
dust2	13–6	-0.03	15%	30 Apr →
nuke	13–9	0.06	25%	30 Apr →
mirage	13–8	0.01	23%	30 Apr →
cache	13–9	0.09	31%	30 Apr →
overpass	13–2	0.09	19%	30 Apr →
mirage	13–16	0.09	30%	29 Apr →
nuke	13–16	0.04	34%	29 Apr →
mirage	16–12	0.10	13%	29 Apr →
cache	13–7	0.09	23%	29 Apr →
dust2	3–13	-0.05	14%	27 Apr →
nuke	13–11	0.03	24%	26 Apr →
dust2	13–9	0.00	20%	26 Apr →
nuke	10–13	0.00	28%	26 Apr →
nuke	13–1	0.07	18%	26 Apr →
ancient	13–5	-0.01	23%	26 Apr →
inferno	13–8	0.03	22%	26 Apr →
nuke	16–14	-0.01	22%	25 Apr →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	20%	25 Apr →
mirage	13–6	0.02	21%	24 Apr →
dust2	16–12	0.08	14%	24 Apr →
nuke	13–10	0.11	19%	22 Apr →
dust2	7–13	0.02	12%	22 Apr →
dust2	13–7	0.01	14%	22 Apr →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	17%	20 Apr →
dust2	16–14	0.04	24%	19 Apr →
mirage	13–16	-0.04	15%	16 Apr →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	17%	15 Apr →
ancient	13–10	0.02	11%	15 Apr →
overpass	13–8	0.11	29%	14 Apr →
inferno	6–13	-0.06	15%	13 Apr →
mirage	9–13	0.06	24%	12 Apr →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	41%	12 Apr →
dust2	13–4	-0.06	16%	12 Apr →