Stauderinho — CS2 Stats

76561198194643215[U:1:234377487]

2,514Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.5 Developing
Premier CS Rating18,567Purple band · top ~14.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#17152 of 36069 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,629 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGStauderinhoFACEITLevel 8 · 1,629 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER18,567 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning41
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47512Last 10047%Win rateLLLLLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.9
Aggression5.6
Utility5.2
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 613ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning4.1
Utility5.2
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time594ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy15.7%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 15.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — ancient 13–0
130Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
L9Current streak
69In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 86% over 7anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B40192148%0.01
mirageA148657%-0.02
nukeC114736%0.02
infernoA95456%-0.03
cacheC73443%-0.00
ancientS76186%0.01
anubisD72529%-0.01
overpass4040%-0.03
office1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,096Matches
50%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
78.4ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage51549%0.9314.6
Dust248354%0.9714.9
Ancient24750%0.9214.6
Nuke17547%0.9715.7
Anubis12543%0.8814.1
Inferno11248%0.8313.0
Overpass4542%0.9314.3
Vertigo3546%1.0615.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.1%Spray accuracy
73.4%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
613msReaction time
27.6%T opening success
42.4%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
11.13HE damage / grenade
5.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.6294% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–130.0717%27 Aug
cache11–13-0.0217%25 Aug
ancient16–19-0.018%25 Aug
dust29–13-0.0516%23 Aug
dust24–13-0.0516%23 Aug
dust25–130.009%12 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0323%12 Aug
nuke11–130.028%11 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0515%10 Aug
dust213–60.0728%10 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0321%9 Aug
dust213–90.0529%7 Aug
dust215–19-0.0519%6 Aug
dust213–80.0321%5 Aug
cache13–90.0016%3 Aug
dust28–130.1124%3 Aug
dust213–16-0.0512%29 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0217%28 Jul
nuke7–130.0825%23 Jul
office6–13-0.0123%23 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0318%23 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0515%20 Jul
inferno13–11-0.008%19 Jul
anubis13–60.0313%15 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0415%15 Jul
dust210–13-0.096%14 Jul
anubis13–3-0.0010%10 Jul
dust213–100.0312%8 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0012%5 Jul
nuke3–90.000%29 Jun
nuke6–130.0222%14 Jun
ancient13–00.1512%14 Jun
dust213–90.0412%30 May
overpass9–13-0.0315%30 May
dust213–11-0.0417%30 May
anubis8–130.0118%29 May
dust213–80.0524%29 May
inferno13–11-0.0416%28 May
dust211–13-0.0114%27 May
cache13–4-0.0118%26 May
cache10–13-0.0219%26 May
cache13–60.0819%26 May
ancient13–50.0121%25 May
dust217–19-0.0414%22 May
dust213–90.0219%21 May
dust213–100.0826%21 May
dust24–13-0.0810%19 May
dust213–9-0.0217%17 May
ancient13–8-0.0610%7 May
inferno7–13-0.0616%6 May
anubis11–13-0.0114%6 May
mirage13–10-0.0011%5 May
mirage11–13-0.058%30 Apr
cache12–12-0.0034%29 Apr
dust26–13-0.0521%29 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0119%26 Apr
dust213–3-0.0026%26 Apr
dust26–130.0120%26 Apr
mirage13–60.0116%26 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0218%26 Apr
anubis4–13-0.0422%23 Apr
dust213–4-0.079%23 Apr
cache11–13-0.0516%23 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0416%22 Apr
dust213–40.0125%22 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0615%19 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0125%19 Apr
nuke13–60.0221%19 Apr
dust213–70.0625%19 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0423%17 Apr
overpass6–13-0.018%14 Apr
dust213–80.0924%12 Apr
dust23–13-0.0615%11 Apr
inferno13–100.029%11 Apr
mirage8–13-0.078%11 Apr
dust210–13-0.0423%5 Apr
nuke13–1-0.016%4 Apr
dust215–15-0.0422%4 Apr
dust29–13-0.0124%4 Apr
dust213–80.0623%2 Apr
mirage13–110.045%2 Apr
nuke13–40.1215%2 Apr
mirage7–130.025%31 Mar
dust213–50.0116%31 Mar
dust213–50.1019%31 Mar
dust210–130.0115%30 Mar
nuke13–40.0315%30 Mar
overpass2–13-0.0319%29 Mar
mirage6–130.0116%29 Mar
dust213–100.1038%29 Mar
overpass4–13-0.0430%29 Mar
nuke3–13-0.0417%29 Mar
dust29–130.0316%29 Mar
mirage2–13-0.0810%29 Mar
dust29–13-0.0516%28 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0213%28 Mar
dust211–13-0.0010%28 Mar
ancient13–80.018%28 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0612%28 Mar
mirage13–4-0.0126%28 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →