Mystic — CS2 Stats

76561198194144153[U:1:233878425]✓ No bans

1,685Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.4 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating25,122Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)

FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89

Positioning51

Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT58–37–5Last 10058%Win rateWWWWWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.9

Aggression7.3

Utility6.1

Positioning5.1

Opening Duels3.7

Clutch4.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9

Positioning5.1

Utility6.1

Mechanics7.8

Opening Duels3.7

Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time544ms−67ms

first ⅓ avg 610ms → last ⅓ avg 544ms

Headshot accuracy21.3%−2.0%

first ⅓ avg 23.3% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — dust2 13–1

13–1Biggest win — dust2

8Longest win streak

W5Current streak

13–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 78% over 9nukeWeakest map · 33% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	24	12–12	50%	0.02
mirage	A	18	11–7	61%	0.03
cache	S	14	10–4	71%	0.03
inferno	S	12	8–4	67%	0.02
nuke	D	12	4–8	33%	0.00
anubis	S	9	7–2	78%	0.01
ancient	A	5	3–2	60%	0.06
overpass	—	3	2–1	67%	0.01
office	—	2	1–1	50%	0.09
debris	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

977Matches

53%Win rate

1.22Avg K/D

75.8ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win

33%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	4	50%	0.78	9.3
Ancient	3	100%	1.60	13.0
Dust2	3	33%	0.93	14.0
Inferno	2	50%	1.32	17.0
Anubis	2	50%	0.96	14.5
Nuke	1	100%	1.43	20.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy

38.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.5%Spray accuracy

85.3%Counter-strafing

8.1°Preaim

534msReaction time

34.3%T opening success

55.3%CT opening success

0.56Enemies flashed / flash

10.5%Flash assists

9.90HE damage / grenade

11.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.3112% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–9	0.01	12%	29 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.02	19%	29 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.09	28%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.09	15%	29 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.05	22%	28 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	16%	28 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.00	22%	27 Aug →
nuke	16–14	-0.01	24%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.01	23%	27 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.03	25%	25 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.04	20%	25 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.00	15%	24 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.05	29%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.12	22%	24 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.03	30%	24 Aug →
inferno	16–12	0.05	21%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.03	16%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.00	11%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–16	0.03	29%	23 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.12	13%	23 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.04	23%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–16	-0.05	15%	23 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.01	15%	23 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	29%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	9%	19 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.05	12%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.00	21%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.11	31%	18 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.00	24%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.11	25%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.06	17%	18 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.02	39%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.11	31%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.02	16%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.03	16%	17 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.04	20%	17 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.04	17%	16 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.01	15%	16 Aug →
dust2	0–5	-0.00	23%	16 Aug →
anubis	7–13	0.05	20%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.01	28%	7 Aug →
mirage	15–15	-0.04	16%	6 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.02	21%	6 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.02	22%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.03	11%	5 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.01	34%	5 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.03	24%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.01	26%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.08	26%	31 Jul →
ancient	15–15	0.08	15%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.03	25%	31 Jul →
dust2	5–0	0.08	23%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.09	22%	30 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.04	19%	30 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.04	28%	30 Jul →
inferno	0–13	-0.00	30%	30 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.01	21%	30 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.00	0%	28 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.07	12%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.01	23%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.01	37%	28 Jul →
debris	1–9	-0.07	28%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.08	21%	22 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.07	29%	22 Jul →
dust2	1–9	-0.01	0%	20 Jul →
dust2	6–4	-0.07	30%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.20	40%	20 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.08	23%	20 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.02	31%	20 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.06	32%	19 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	27%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.08	20%	19 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.06	25%	19 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.02	14%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.12	21%	19 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.00	0%	16 Jul →
nuke	14–16	-0.02	26%	19 May →
nuke	4–13	-0.05	25%	19 May →
anubis	13–6	0.09	27%	19 May →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	17%	19 May →
cache	13–11	0.02	19%	19 May →
cache	8–13	0.02	31%	19 May →
nuke	10–13	0.01	18%	3 Feb →
inferno	13–6	-0.04	22%	24 Jan →
anubis	16–14	-0.00	19%	24 Jan →
overpass	11–13	0.01	12%	24 Jan →
nuke	13–5	-0.00	24%	24 Jan →
ancient	13–7	0.08	27%	21 Jan →
nuke	8–13	-0.08	15%	19 Jan →
overpass	13–11	0.04	32%	16 Jan →
inferno	13–2	0.13	33%	16 Jan →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	19%	22 Nov →
dust2	13–7	0.00	19%	22 Nov →
office	11–13	0.10	43%	22 Nov →
mirage	7–13	0.02	20%	27 Sept →
office	13–7	0.07	36%	27 Sept →
nuke	13–5	0.13	34%	27 Sept →
anubis	13–8	0.00	16%	27 Sept →
dust2	13–8	-0.03	14%	27 Sept →
overpass	13–3	-0.01	28%	27 Sept →