Copy — CS2 Stats

76561198190329567[U:1:230063839]✓ No bans

305Tracked matches59%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.7 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,935Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10110 of 34611 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCopyFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER21,935 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim97
Positioning57
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49492Last 10049%Win rateLWLLWTWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.7
Aggression8.9
Utility4.4
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels5.4
Clutch1.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 97 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 94% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

CT openings. 65% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 65% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.7
Positioning5.7
Utility4.4
Mechanics9.8
Opening Duels5.4
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time598ms−90ms
first ⅓ avg 688ms → last ⅓ avg 598ms
Headshot accuracy22.9%−3.7%
first ⅓ avg 26.7% → last ⅓ avg 22.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–3
132Biggest win — cache
5Longest win streak
411In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 74% over 19dust2Weakest map · 33% over 27
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D2791833%0.00
mirageC23101343%0.02
cacheS1914574%0.04
ancientS107370%0.03
nukeC83538%-0.01
anubisB63350%-0.00
debris31233%0.02
inferno2020%-0.03
overpass220100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 27). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

22Matches
55%Win rate
1.26Avg K/D
88.0ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage771%1.5320.0
Dust2560%1.2816.6
Anubis540%1.2915.4
Nuke333%0.6212.7
Inferno10%1.0019.0
Ancient1100%1.3316.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.5%Headshot accuracy
47.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
47.7%Spray accuracy
94.0%Counter-strafing
7.4°Preaim
578msReaction time
38.5%T opening success
65.0%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
8.35HE damage / grenade
7.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.5083% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 27 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache11–130.0230%29 Aug
cache13–110.0826%29 Aug
dust25–130.0425%29 Aug
dust26–13-0.0216%29 Aug
anubis13–60.0114%29 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0118%29 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0019%29 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0213%28 Aug
dust28–130.0015%27 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0323%27 Aug
nuke10–130.0326%27 Aug
mirage13–100.0516%24 Aug
ancient11–130.0520%24 Aug
ancient13–80.088%24 Aug
dust210–130.0024%24 Aug
cache11–130.1323%23 Aug
dust213–10-0.0223%23 Aug
cache13–40.0429%23 Aug
mirage13–80.0032%23 Aug
cache13–40.0522%23 Aug
dust214–16-0.0121%23 Aug
cache13–20.0226%23 Aug
cache13–80.0421%23 Aug
mirage13–70.0331%22 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0029%22 Aug
mirage13–60.0330%6 Aug
dust214–16-0.0419%5 Aug
dust25–130.0729%4 Aug
dust29–13-0.0518%29 Jul
cache13–80.0837%29 Jul
mirage4–130.0017%28 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0228%28 Jul
mirage10–130.0529%27 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0229%26 Jul
ancient13–100.0836%26 Jul
ancient9–130.0633%26 Jul
cache13–90.0835%26 Jul
cache7–130.0128%26 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0129%26 Jul
cache13–70.0221%26 Jul
dust29–13-0.0226%26 Jul
cache13–80.0021%26 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0321%26 Jul
dust213–20.0913%26 Jul
cache13–60.0128%26 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0024%26 Jul
dust216–120.0725%26 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0529%25 Jul
cache13–40.0736%25 Jul
cache13–6-0.0237%25 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0444%25 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0720%25 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0640%25 Jul
dust26–13-0.0240%24 Jul
cache6–130.0538%24 Jul
anubis6–130.0532%24 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0137%24 Jul
mirage13–40.0624%24 Jul
dust213–80.0232%24 Jul
mirage10–130.1140%24 Jul
dust27–130.0128%24 Jul
dust213–70.0423%24 Jul
mirage13–110.0423%23 Jul
mirage13–30.1344%23 Jul
mirage9–130.0142%23 Jul
dust213–6-0.0326%22 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0220%22 Jul
dust26–13-0.0432%22 Jul
anubis14–16-0.0328%9 Jul
cache13–80.0445%9 Jul
debris6–90.0118%9 Jul
debris7–9-0.0324%9 Jul
debris9–10.0938%9 Jul
cache5–130.0244%9 Jul
cache13–40.0928%9 Jul
ancient13–20.0824%9 Jul
dust29–13-0.0127%9 Jul
mirage7–130.0131%5 Jul
dust28–13-0.0129%4 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0222%4 Jul
dust27–130.0023%3 Jul
anubis13–10-0.029%3 Jul
overpass13–80.0526%3 Jul
ancient13–70.0725%3 Jul
dust211–13-0.0125%3 Jul
mirage11–130.0420%3 Jul
dust213–30.0823%3 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0633%2 Jul
nuke13–50.0436%1 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0418%1 Jul
overpass16–140.0420%1 Jul
mirage2–90.0322%29 Jun
dust24–13-0.0222%29 Jun
mirage12–16-0.0126%29 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0218%29 Jun
dust213–110.1021%28 Jun
dust213–9-0.0729%25 Jun
nuke15–150.0531%25 Jun
mirage4–130.0425%25 Jun
dust211–13-0.0238%25 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →