π‘π˜πŽπ’

π‘π˜πŽπ’ β€” CS2 Stats

FR76561198190150386[U:1:229884658]Steam profile β†—

2,928Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating26,691Top 10% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band Β· top ~2.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1413 of 23734 tracked
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGπ‘π˜πŽπ’PREMIER26,691 Β· Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere β€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning55
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–50–1Last 10049%Win rateLWWWLLWTWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate Β· +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler β€” Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8
Aggression8.4
Utility4.2
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates β€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions β€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison β†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 β€” the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points β€” deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game β€” the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 32% on T β€” the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers β€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.5
Utility4.2
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (Γ—1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first β…“ avg 0.01 β†’ last β…“ avg 0.01
Reaction time524msβˆ’38ms
first β…“ avg 563ms β†’ last β…“ avg 524ms
Headshot accuracy23.3%βˆ’3.0%
first β…“ avg 26.3% β†’ last β…“ avg 23.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating β€” dust2 13–3
13–1Biggest win β€” nuke
4Longest win streak
7–7In matches decided by ≀2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map Β· 67% over 15mirageWeakest map Β· 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C3314–1942%0.02
infernoA1810–856%0.00
nukeS1510–567%0.05
anubisC146–843%0.01
mirageC83–538%-0.00
cacheC73–443%0.01
ancientA53–260%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,057Matches
51%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
80.2ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust225051%1.1216.3
Mirage24452%1.1316.6
Inferno15651%1.1516.5
Ancient15355%1.1316.4
Anubis14048%1.1016.4
Nuke8238%1.0716.4
Train3962%1.2117.1
Overpass1346%0.9517.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API β€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches β€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.9%Headshot accuracy
37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.7%Spray accuracy
82.0%Counter-strafing
9.4Β°Preaim
510msReaction time
32.1%T opening success
55.4%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
2.2%Flash assists
6.87HE damage / grenade
8.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag β€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.1338% β€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics β€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games β€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy β†’Mirage grenade lineups β†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis11–13-0.0224%29 Aug β†’
dust213–9-0.0526%28 Aug β†’
ancient13–11-0.0118%28 Aug β†’
inferno13–4-0.0133%28 Aug β†’
anubis10–13-0.0125%28 Aug β†’
dust24–13-0.0121%28 Aug β†’
dust213–50.0223%28 Aug β†’
anubis15–150.0120%27 Aug β†’
anubis13–80.0615%27 Aug β†’
dust213–20.1222%27 Aug β†’
dust213–50.1227%27 Aug β†’
inferno6–13-0.0424%26 Aug β†’
dust26–13-0.0324%26 Aug β†’
anubis13–60.0122%26 Aug β†’
ancient7–13-0.0517%26 Aug β†’
cache11–13-0.0329%25 Aug β†’
inferno13–100.0729%25 Aug β†’
inferno13–16-0.0522%25 Aug β†’
inferno13–8-0.0426%25 Aug β†’
dust213–60.0325%25 Aug β†’
inferno4–13-0.0116%24 Aug β†’
anubis11–130.0521%24 Aug β†’
cache4–13-0.0036%24 Aug β†’
nuke13–60.0714%24 Aug β†’
inferno10–130.0138%23 Aug β†’
dust213–110.0319%23 Aug β†’
dust24–13-0.0620%23 Aug β†’
nuke11–130.0020%23 Aug β†’
inferno13–100.0124%23 Aug β†’
dust27–130.0014%23 Aug β†’
dust213–30.1927%23 Aug β†’
nuke13–100.0917%21 Aug β†’
anubis4–13-0.0533%21 Aug β†’
dust25–130.0234%21 Aug β†’
anubis6–13-0.0123%21 Aug β†’
dust210–130.0219%21 Aug β†’
anubis13–90.0017%21 Aug β†’
nuke13–10.0617%20 Aug β†’
dust213–90.0938%20 Aug β†’
ancient8–130.0230%20 Aug β†’
nuke13–110.0416%20 Aug β†’
dust213–60.0627%20 Aug β†’
anubis5–130.0931%20 Aug β†’
inferno13–50.1026%20 Aug β†’
dust23–130.0014%19 Aug β†’
dust211–130.0129%19 Aug β†’
nuke13–50.0436%19 Aug β†’
dust213–100.0117%19 Aug β†’
mirage13–80.0128%19 Aug β†’
nuke3–60.0628%18 Aug β†’
anubis13–11-0.0417%17 Aug β†’
inferno13–10-0.0020%17 Aug β†’
dust213–100.0322%17 Aug β†’
nuke13–6-0.0220%17 Aug β†’
dust29–13-0.0020%17 Aug β†’
dust213–9-0.0120%17 Aug β†’
mirage8–13-0.0618%17 Aug β†’
dust27–4-0.0419%17 Aug β†’
mirage0–130.0227%15 Aug β†’
inferno13–9-0.0137%15 Aug β†’
cache13–100.0522%15 Aug β†’
dust29–130.0242%15 Aug β†’
inferno10–130.0424%15 Aug β†’
nuke6–13-0.009%15 Aug β†’
nuke9–130.0917%14 Aug β†’
cache13–50.0420%14 Aug β†’
mirage13–40.0220%14 Aug β†’
anubis13–60.0318%14 Aug β†’
nuke13–3-0.0334%14 Aug β†’
nuke7–130.0431%14 Aug β†’
dust28–130.0321%13 Aug β†’
anubis13–160.0235%13 Aug β†’
cache5–130.0521%13 Aug β†’
dust213–110.0829%13 Aug β†’
dust211–130.0022%13 Aug β†’
inferno13–100.0122%12 Aug β†’
ancient13–60.0426%12 Aug β†’
dust22–13-0.0430%12 Aug β†’
mirage8–13-0.0420%12 Aug β†’
nuke13–9-0.0028%12 Aug β†’
dust25–13-0.0235%12 Aug β†’
inferno1–13-0.0619%11 Aug β†’
ancient13–110.0321%11 Aug β†’
inferno11–13-0.0338%11 Aug β†’
inferno13–100.0418%11 Aug β†’
mirage13–100.0943%11 Aug β†’
dust23–13-0.0335%10 Aug β†’
dust25–13-0.0119%10 Aug β†’
mirage10–13-0.0022%10 Aug β†’
dust27–13-0.0617%10 Aug β†’
nuke13–60.1629%10 Aug β†’
dust27–13-0.0333%9 Aug β†’
inferno10–13-0.0231%9 Aug β†’
cache5–13-0.0518%9 Aug β†’
nuke16–140.0729%2 Aug β†’
mirage12–16-0.0527%2 Aug β†’
inferno16–120.0524%2 Aug β†’
dust27–130.0229%2 Aug β†’
cache13–30.0225%2 Aug β†’
anubis13–90.0618%2 Aug β†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone β†’Inventory value for this account β†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers β†’