Tactcs — CS2 Stats

76561198188306393[U:1:228040665]

1,224Tracked matches70%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.4 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,837Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4750 of 17280 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTactcsFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER22,837 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning57
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50437Last 10050%Win rateLWWWWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.3
Aggression8.5
Utility5.4
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch3.6

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.6° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 629ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.7
Utility5.4
Mechanics9.4
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.05
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time638ms+9ms
first ⅓ avg 629ms → last ⅓ avg 638ms
Headshot accuracy23.8%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 22.7% → last ⅓ avg 23.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — nuke 9–5
133Biggest win — nuke
5Longest win streak
108In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 12infernoWeakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2114767%0.05
cacheC1871139%0.00
ancientA1811761%0.00
anubisS129375%0.02
mirageD103730%0.05
infernoD91811%-0.03
vertigo42250%0.08
overpass31233%0.03
rooftop21150%0.01
eldorado1010%0.05
sanctum110100%0.11
dust21010%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

464Matches
50%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
87.7ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis8061%1.1918.2
Nuke6156%1.1717.8
Mirage5834%1.0716.9
Ancient5163%1.1317.3
Cache2631%1.1218.4
Vertigo2442%0.9915.9
Inferno1839%1.1416.6
Overpass50%0.9514.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.0%Headshot accuracy
36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.8%Spray accuracy
92.1%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
629msReaction time
32.0%T opening success
56.8%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
9.6%Flash assists
8.20HE damage / grenade
6.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.9832% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache9–13-0.0325%26 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0110%21 Aug
anubis13–90.0711%21 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0324%21 Aug
nuke19–17-0.0111%20 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0219%18 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0418%17 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0415%17 Aug
anubis13–50.0226%17 Aug
cache11–13-0.0220%16 Aug
anubis13–110.0219%15 Aug
ancient8–13-0.029%13 Aug
cache13–11-0.0126%10 Aug
ancient13–100.0415%10 Aug
cache11–130.0117%7 Aug
nuke16–130.0036%6 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0732%5 Aug
cache10–13-0.0425%5 Aug
ancient13–110.0037%4 Aug
nuke13–100.0547%4 Aug
cache11–13-0.0229%3 Aug
anubis13–60.0821%3 Aug
nuke13–30.0225%3 Aug
ancient0–13-0.0729%2 Aug
anubis13–40.0934%2 Aug
inferno8–80.0034%1 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0321%1 Aug
nuke13–100.0523%1 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0525%30 Jul
ancient13–60.0327%29 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0026%28 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0319%21 Jul
inferno8–80.0630%20 Jul
anubis13–110.0121%20 Jul
eldorado8–80.0533%19 Jul
nuke2–13-0.1011%19 Jul
vertigo4–9-0.1238%19 Jul
cache13–40.0721%18 Jul
ancient13–50.0525%13 Jul
inferno2–9-0.1816%13 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0216%10 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0117%9 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0533%9 Jul
cache16–140.0120%9 Jul
mirage13–30.0220%9 Jul
nuke13–70.1125%9 Jul
cache5–130.0220%9 Jul
cache13–50.0224%6 Jul
cache5–13-0.0321%25 Jun
mirage9–130.0325%24 Jun
nuke13–110.0531%24 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0016%24 Jun
inferno11–130.0935%5 Jun
vertigo12–120.0923%5 Jun
ancient9–130.0318%4 Jun
anubis13–70.0731%4 Jun
inferno8–8-0.0319%4 Jun
vertigo9–00.1424%4 Jun
sanctum9–50.1111%4 Jun
nuke9–60.0815%4 Jun
inferno2–9-0.1322%4 Jun
ancient13–40.0627%4 Jun
cache6–130.0216%1 Jun
mirage13–80.1122%1 Jun
anubis8–130.0614%1 Jun
nuke13–100.0526%31 May
nuke13–40.0229%28 May
mirage6–130.0218%27 May
cache16–140.0524%26 May
mirage16–130.0716%26 May
cache11–130.0124%26 May
nuke11–130.0415%25 May
ancient8–13-0.0126%25 May
nuke13–160.0224%21 May
overpass5–9-0.0527%19 May
nuke9–40.1443%19 May
inferno9–50.1217%19 May
cache13–10-0.0031%17 May
cache11–13-0.0325%17 May
overpass9–130.0218%8 May
nuke10–130.0930%8 May
mirage14–160.0613%8 May
cache13–50.0518%29 Apr
cache6–13-0.0211%29 Apr
mirage13–160.0625%11 Apr
ancient15–150.0824%11 Apr
overpass9–60.1117%31 Dec
rooftop5–9-0.0317%31 Dec
vertigo9–40.1812%31 Dec
inferno2–9-0.2027%31 Dec
nuke9–50.2027%31 Dec
rooftop9–50.0641%31 Dec
inferno5–9-0.0141%31 Dec
mirage3–130.0115%29 Nov
dust26–130.0622%9 Nov
nuke13–60.1424%9 Nov
mirage6–130.0824%9 Nov
nuke1–120.0920%8 Nov
mirage8–130.0619%8 Nov
anubis12–120.0216%8 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →