Teltsi

Teltsi — CS2 Stats

PT76561198186714597[U:1:226448869]Steam profile ↗

1,498Tracked matches28%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.8 Learning
Premier CS Rating19,426Purple band · top ~10.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6508 of 13283 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTeltsiFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER19,426 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning36
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45505Last 10045%Win rateLWWWLLTLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.5
Aggression5.7
Utility4.9
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels1.0
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 574ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning3.6
Utility4.9
Mechanics3.7
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time574ms+23ms
first ⅓ avg 551ms → last ⅓ avg 574ms
Headshot accuracy16.3%−2.2%
first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — inferno 9–3
133Biggest win — inferno
6Longest win streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 18infernoWeakest map · 33% over 27
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD2791833%-0.01
mirageS1812667%0.00
ancientD1551033%0.00
dust2A127558%0.00
anubisD124833%-0.01
nukeB84450%-0.00
cacheB63350%-0.00
vertigo110100%0.07
debris1010%-0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 27). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,342Matches
51%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
81.5ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage34753%1.1115.8
Anubis20853%1.1316.7
Inferno15953%1.1316.5
Ancient15649%1.0515.9
Dust210450%1.0014.7
Vertigo5145%1.0315.1
Nuke3441%0.9514.7
Overpass1662%0.9615.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy
33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.8%Spray accuracy
66.8%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
574msReaction time
30.7%T opening success
37.6%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
9.70HE damage / grenade
6.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.7495% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 27 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–13-0.0623%30 Jul
inferno13–9-0.099%28 Jul
vertigo9–60.0720%28 Jul
mirage13–70.0517%27 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0220%27 Jul
inferno2–13-0.058%27 Jul
inferno8–8-0.048%27 Jul
mirage10–130.0619%24 Jul
mirage16–140.0214%24 Jul
dust26–130.0021%24 Jul
inferno11–130.0621%23 Jul
inferno11–130.0726%23 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0415%23 Jul
anubis13–160.0019%23 Jul
dust215–15-0.0210%23 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0317%23 Jul
nuke9–130.0419%23 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0112%23 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0212%22 Jul
nuke10–130.0625%22 Jul
mirage10–13-0.103%22 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0012%22 Jul
inferno5–130.0119%22 Jul
inferno1–13-0.068%22 Jul
cache13–10-0.0118%21 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0413%21 Jul
dust213–10-0.0020%20 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0212%20 Jul
ancient13–60.0210%20 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0717%20 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0333%20 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0318%20 Jul
mirage13–80.0423%20 Jul
inferno15–150.0134%17 Jul
ancient13–70.0514%17 Jul
cache10–13-0.0121%17 Jul
dust213–11-0.0317%17 Jul
cache11–13-0.0120%17 Jul
inferno9–13-0.059%17 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0418%17 Jul
nuke13–110.0121%17 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0327%17 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0336%17 Jul
dust23–10.0910%16 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0219%16 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0012%16 Jul
inferno13–3-0.0118%16 Jul
mirage13–70.0215%15 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0123%15 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0318%15 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0214%15 Jul
cache13–80.1022%14 Jul
mirage6–130.0718%14 Jul
anubis13–6-0.019%14 Jul
ancient10–130.0921%14 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0227%14 Jul
dust213–11-0.0314%14 Jul
dust29–13-0.0018%14 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0416%14 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0318%13 Jul
mirage1–9-0.0121%13 Jul
anubis6–130.0225%13 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0317%13 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0322%13 Jul
cache13–8-0.0714%13 Jul
mirage13–70.0121%13 Jul
inferno13–40.0824%13 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0023%13 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0532%12 Jul
anubis6–3-0.010%12 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0519%10 Jul
anubis6–13-0.045%10 Jul
anubis13–110.0422%9 Jul
cache3–130.0016%9 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0519%9 Jul
ancient13–100.1113%9 Jul
debris4–9-0.1310%9 Jul
inferno13–90.1022%9 Jul
nuke9–6-0.0013%8 Jul
inferno9–4-0.0031%7 Jul
nuke7–9-0.0528%7 Jul
inferno9–30.2228%7 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0136%5 Jul
nuke16–13-0.0224%4 Jul
anubis7–2-0.0319%4 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0211%4 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0318%4 Jul
dust210–130.0216%30 Jun
mirage13–30.0026%30 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0214%30 Jun
dust213–6-0.0412%30 Jun
nuke13–7-0.029%30 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0817%30 Jun
ancient13–80.0121%29 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0321%29 Jun
dust213–40.0713%29 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0515%29 Jun
dust213–7-0.0037%29 Jun
mirage13–110.0413%28 Jun
inferno3–13-0.018%28 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →