Sergeant Shagger

Sergeant Shagger — CS2 Stats

76561198179720633[U:1:219454905]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

571Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating21,619Top 50% of 44,590 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#16984 of 58472 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSergeant ShaggerFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER21,619 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning41
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45496Last 10045%Win rateTLWLLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -50pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion well above par.

Aim6.7
Aggression3.3
Utility4.9
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch10.0

Excellent counter-strafingReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 605ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning4.1
Utility4.9
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels0.5
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time606ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms
Headshot accuracy15.8%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — mirage 13–3
130Biggest win — inferno
6Longest win streak
714In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 83% over 6ancientWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC28101836%-0.01
mirageA2011955%-0.01
nukeB157847%-0.02
overpassS139469%0.03
cacheS65183%-0.02
ancientD5050%-0.02
trainD51420%-0.02
dust2C52340%-0.00
shelter1010%-0.01
anubis1010%-0.08
golden1010%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

129Matches
47%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
75.5ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2100%1.4416.0
Nuke1100%0.6911.0
Ancient1100%0.8815.0
Vertigo1100%1.3316.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.8%Spray accuracy
88.6%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
605msReaction time
24.0%T opening success
34.0%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
10.76HE damage / grenade
6.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.9606% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
shelter12–12-0.0113%10 Jul
ancient11–13-0.039%30 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0329%30 Jun
train5–13-0.0019%18 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0416%17 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0712%11 Jun
mirage13–80.0212%11 Jun
inferno8–130.0223%2 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0411%1 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0016%21 May
nuke14–160.0422%21 May
mirage13–30.1219%21 May
mirage16–14-0.0111%20 May
cache13–11-0.0713%17 May
cache8–130.0114%12 May
cache13–90.0119%11 May
cache13–100.0214%11 May
cache13–7-0.0219%3 May
cache13–7-0.0919%1 May
dust213–70.037%24 Apr
inferno13–0-0.0020%24 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0118%24 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0712%8 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0217%5 Apr
inferno7–130.0416%3 Apr
nuke7–130.0125%31 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0820%31 Mar
ancient15–150.0012%29 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0117%24 Mar
inferno13–7-0.0219%24 Mar
inferno9–13-0.037%18 Mar
mirage8–13-0.066%5 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0416%3 Mar
mirage16–12-0.0014%2 Mar
dust24–13-0.0213%2 Mar
dust27–13-0.0214%1 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0516%1 Mar
nuke13–110.0418%28 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0222%28 Feb
mirage16–12-0.047%27 Feb
overpass13–50.0914%24 Feb
overpass15–150.0119%23 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0021%23 Feb
nuke13–10-0.0417%10 Feb
train13–70.0220%1 Dec
overpass11–130.0414%25 Nov
overpass13–70.0113%15 Oct
dust213–60.0810%15 Oct
nuke16–12-0.054%14 Oct
golden12–120.1014%13 Oct
mirage6–13-0.0315%12 Oct
inferno13–9-0.0024%11 Oct
mirage3–13-0.0514%11 Oct
overpass11–13-0.0017%10 Oct
inferno13–9-0.045%9 Oct
ancient15–15-0.0116%9 Oct
mirage13–70.0124%8 Oct
mirage10–13-0.0620%6 Oct
nuke13–50.0116%6 Oct
nuke11–13-0.0118%6 Oct
overpass13–70.0219%28 Sept
inferno12–120.0017%28 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0119%27 Sept
train8–13-0.0117%27 Sept
overpass13–80.1218%27 Sept
overpass13–10.0310%27 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0115%26 Sept
dust29–13-0.0835%26 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0322%25 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0212%25 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0115%25 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0118%23 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0215%18 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0122%18 Sept
inferno11–130.0220%16 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0431%15 Sept
overpass13–90.0311%15 Sept
mirage13–110.0424%14 Sept
overpass13–50.0725%12 Sept
mirage13–2-0.0111%12 Sept
mirage11–13-0.049%10 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0424%10 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0418%10 Sept
overpass13–90.0111%7 Sept
mirage13–20.0318%7 Sept
overpass13–10-0.0416%3 Sept
inferno11–130.0832%2 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0517%1 Sept
train3–13-0.0826%1 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0813%1 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0116%29 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0516%29 Aug
train6–13-0.047%28 Aug
inferno11–130.0016%28 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0415%26 Aug
overpass8–13-0.0310%26 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0210%26 Aug
inferno13–110.0517%25 Aug
mirage11–40.0018%25 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0718%20 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →