Jewie2k — CS2 Stats

76561198178172295[U:1:217906567]✓ No bans

1,952Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating23,714Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#5838 of 29164 tracked

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80

Positioning49

Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–47–11Last 10042%Win rateWTWLLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.0

Aggression5.2

Utility4.8

Positioning4.9

Opening Duels2.5

Clutch1.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 573ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0

Positioning4.9

Utility4.8

Mechanics8.4

Opening Duels2.5

Win Impact1.9

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time570ms−58ms

first ⅓ avg 628ms → last ⅓ avg 570ms

Headshot accuracy15.2%+1.4%

first ⅓ avg 13.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — anubis 13–5

13–2Biggest win — nuke

5Longest win streak

6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

4Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 57% over 14dust2Weakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	C	18	8–10	44%	0.02
mirage	A	16	9–7	56%	-0.00
anubis	C	15	6–9	40%	0.01
cache	C	14	5–9	36%	-0.00
inferno	A	14	8–6	57%	-0.01
vertigo	B	6	3–3	50%	0.03
dust2	D	5	1–4	20%	-0.03
ancient	D	5	1–4	20%	-0.03
office	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.02
train	—	3	1–2	33%	0.03
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

42Matches

64%Win rate

1.38Avg K/D

81.3ADR

35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win

33%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Vertigo	14	86%	1.57	20.2
Nuke	11	45%	1.20	17.9
Mirage	5	40%	0.98	15.2
Dust2	4	50%	1.44	21.5
Anubis	3	67%	1.87	17.0
Inferno	2	50%	1.68	17.5
Ancient	2	100%	1.06	11.5
Overpass	1	100%	0.83	10.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy

37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.7%Spray accuracy

87.8%Counter-strafing

9.4°Preaim

573msReaction time

29.8%T opening success

50.1%CT opening success

0.65Enemies flashed / flash

2.6%Flash assists

9.63HE damage / grenade

5.71Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.7994% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–11	0.01	15%	27 Aug →
cache	12–12	-0.00	19%	27 Aug →
vertigo	9–4	0.04	5%	27 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.03	11%	27 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.08	8%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.01	18%	27 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.02	30%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	17%	24 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.03	24%	24 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.12	13%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.03	10%	23 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.06	20%	23 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.03	21%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.02	26%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.10	0%	23 Aug →
overpass	8–8	0.02	15%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.02	19%	23 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.05	12%	22 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	14%	22 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.06	16%	22 Aug →
anubis	2–13	-0.02	12%	21 Aug →
anubis	0–13	-0.01	14%	21 Aug →
office	9–13	-0.02	10%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.04	14%	19 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	19%	19 Aug →
vertigo	8–13	0.04	10%	18 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.00	21%	18 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.01	20%	17 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.10	16%	17 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.09	11%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.01	10%	16 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.04	10%	16 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.04	24%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.05	14%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–5	-0.04	32%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.04	18%	13 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.01	19%	13 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.03	15%	12 Aug →
office	0–13	-0.05	8%	12 Aug →
train	11–13	0.04	19%	12 Aug →
train	13–10	0.02	22%	12 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.06	22%	11 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.01	7%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.05	14%	6 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.07	18%	6 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.03	16%	5 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.02	13%	5 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.05	12%	5 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.06	11%	5 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	8%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	22%	4 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.01	16%	4 Aug →
vertigo	13–8	0.04	22%	4 Aug →
vertigo	0–3	-0.01	33%	4 Aug →
nuke	4–4	-0.06	5%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.00	12%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.10	21%	3 Aug →
cache	12–12	0.01	9%	3 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.05	10%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.05	3%	31 Jul →
vertigo	12–12	0.04	11%	30 Jul →
vertigo	13–8	0.04	11%	30 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.01	18%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.08	7%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–6	-0.06	8%	26 Jul →
anubis	6–6	0.00	9%	26 Jul →
train	11–13	0.04	21%	26 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.07	5%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.10	16%	25 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.03	9%	25 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.00	11%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.02	18%	24 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.04	20%	24 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.07	13%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	10%	21 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.02	9%	21 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.02	21%	21 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.06	15%	20 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.08	13%	20 Jul →
nuke	12–12	-0.03	15%	20 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.04	17%	20 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.11	20%	20 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.07	9%	20 Jul →
cache	15–15	-0.04	13%	17 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.05	14%	17 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	28%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.03	12%	16 Jul →
anubis	5–13	0.03	11%	16 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.05	6%	16 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	13%	16 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.04	13%	16 Jul →
anubis	5–13	0.01	17%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.07	9%	15 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.03	24%	15 Jul →
office	12–12	0.02	12%	12 Jul →
cache	16–13	0.02	10%	12 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.07	7%	12 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.01	17%	12 Jul →
nuke	12–12	0.08	19%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.11	11%	12 Jul →