kalum

kalum — CS2 Stats

76561198176264202[U:1:215998474]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,460Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingAggressive Rifler
CSDB Leaderboard#23381 of 51261 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,521 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

18,679Peak Premier on CSDB
1,521Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,521
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 10 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkalumFACEITLevel 7 · 1,521 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,521csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning51
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY405010Last 10040%Win rateLWWLWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.0
Aggression6.7
Utility4.8
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch5.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning5.1
Utility4.8
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time605ms+3ms
first ⅓ avg 602ms → last ⅓ avg 605ms
Headshot accuracy20.8%−1.7%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.25Best rating — vertigo 9–2
132Biggest win — cache
4Longest win streak
58In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 9dust2Weakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC1981142%0.02
poseidonD1551033%0.03
mirageA106460%0.02
cacheD92722%0.02
ancientS96367%0.06
vertigoA74357%0.10
infernoD72529%-0.02
sanctumD62433%-0.04
dust2D51420%0.03
anubis42250%-0.00
overpass41325%0.02
debris31233%-0.10
fachwerk1010%0.01
eldorado1010%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

143Matches
57%Win rate
1.27Avg K/D
87.6ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4762%1.2115.4
Dust21947%1.4218.4
Ancient1856%1.5016.2
Nuke1765%1.0515.8
Inferno1650%1.2015.3
Vertigo1155%1.3417.0
Anubis540%1.0914.8
Train475%1.1915.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.2%Spray accuracy
81.4%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
588msReaction time
26.2%T opening success
54.5%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
9.3%Flash assists
7.37HE damage / grenade
7.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.151% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–13-0.0626%29 Aug
anubis13–70.0318%28 Aug
mirage16–130.0224%28 Aug
fachwerk11–130.0123%12 Jul
debris9–6-0.0115%12 Jul
debris0–9-0.2825%12 Jul
eldorado4–9-0.0728%12 Jul
debris2–8-0.010%12 Jul
poseidon6–9-0.0027%20 Jun
sanctum9–30.1446%20 Jun
vertigo9–20.2541%20 Jun
poseidon3–9-0.0724%20 Jun
sanctum3–9-0.1230%4 Jun
cache12–120.0629%4 Jun
nuke9–10.189%4 Jun
cache7–13-0.0523%26 May
sanctum9–7-0.0224%20 May
nuke2–9-0.1313%20 May
poseidon6–90.0016%8 May
cache12–12-0.0115%5 May
vertigo8–80.0826%4 May
nuke9–70.0418%4 May
poseidon6–9-0.0236%4 May
poseidon8–80.0120%3 May
cache13–20.0719%3 May
ancient14–16-0.0112%2 May
mirage13–4-0.0214%2 May
poseidon8–80.0717%2 May
sanctum8–8-0.086%2 May
cache4–130.0710%2 May
vertigo7–9-0.0318%2 May
vertigo9–40.2118%2 May
nuke6–90.0318%2 May
nuke9–40.0412%2 May
dust210–13-0.0015%1 May
inferno9–13-0.0513%1 May
vertigo9–50.088%1 May
inferno6–9-0.0215%1 May
nuke6–90.0113%1 May
overpass7–130.0316%1 May
cache13–70.0519%1 May
nuke9–40.0713%1 May
nuke9–30.099%1 May
nuke8–80.019%30 Apr
sanctum3–9-0.176%30 Apr
cache10–130.0222%30 Apr
cache3–90.0313%30 Apr
cache3–13-0.0821%29 Apr
poseidon9–50.1238%27 Apr
sanctum7–9-0.019%27 Apr
poseidon9–20.0616%27 Apr
nuke8–8-0.0717%27 Apr
vertigo9–60.1212%27 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0515%27 Apr
anubis8–20.0113%27 Apr
dust27–13-0.0413%26 Apr
ancient13–100.0711%26 Apr
ancient13–70.0510%26 Apr
nuke13–30.0321%26 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0110%25 Apr
mirage13–90.0713%25 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0010%25 Apr
inferno13–40.047%25 Apr
overpass3–13-0.099%25 Apr
mirage13–110.0616%25 Apr
ancient13–60.0817%25 Apr
nuke1–9-0.209%25 Apr
nuke5–9-0.0810%25 Apr
poseidon9–50.1723%24 Apr
nuke9–40.2223%24 Apr
poseidon7–9-0.0850%23 Apr
nuke9–60.0410%21 Apr
inferno9–6-0.0518%21 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0413%20 Apr
mirage15–150.0516%20 Apr
mirage1–130.0326%20 Apr
nuke8–130.0120%20 Apr
ancient13–60.1125%20 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0024%20 Apr
dust27–130.0619%19 Apr
ancient9–130.0716%19 Apr
poseidon5–9-0.1019%19 Apr
overpass7–90.0813%19 Apr
poseidon9–50.1536%19 Apr
vertigo8–8-0.0122%19 Apr
ancient10–130.1027%12 Apr
dust213–100.2112%12 Apr
mirage1–50.0431%12 Apr
poseidon5–9-0.0629%12 Apr
poseidon5–90.0436%5 Apr
poseidon9–70.0923%5 Apr
nuke7–90.0723%5 Apr
inferno7–90.1027%4 Apr
inferno2–9-0.1725%4 Apr
mirage13–60.0121%29 Mar
ancient13–90.0111%29 Mar
ancient13–80.0532%29 Mar
overpass6–00.0728%29 Mar
nuke6–9-0.0913%29 Mar
nuke9–130.0420%28 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →