Frog Sandwich — CS2 Stats

76561198175693650[U:1:215427922]Steam profile ↗

497Tracked matches71%Win rate2022Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81

Positioning54

Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–41–8Last 10051%Win rateWLLLWTLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -50pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.1

Aggression8.3

Utility4.3

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels3.3

Clutch1.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 673ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1

Positioning5.4

Utility4.3

Mechanics7.9

Opening Duels3.3

Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time667ms−17ms

first ⅓ avg 684ms → last ⅓ avg 667ms

Headshot accuracy20.1%+1.1%

first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — vertigo 13–2

13–2Biggest win — vertigo

6Longest win streak

8–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 65% over 26mirageWeakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	S	26	17–9	65%	0.03
ancient	C	17	7–10	41%	0.02
inferno	B	15	8–7	53%	0.02
nuke	D	12	4–8	33%	0.01
overpass	B	8	4–4	50%	0.04
dust2	A	8	5–3	63%	0.01
vertigo	A	5	3–2	60%	0.08
mirage	D	5	1–4	20%	0.02
anubis	—	2	1–1	50%	0.07
office	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

10Matches

50%Win rate

1.42Avg K/D

83.2ADR

50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	4	50%	1.43	19.8
Inferno	2	50%	1.28	15.5
Mirage	2	50%	1.32	19.0
Ancient	1	100%	2.29	16.0
Nuke	1	0%	1.00	32.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy

38.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

44.2%Spray accuracy

85.5%Counter-strafing

8.8°Preaim

673msReaction time

34.1%T opening success

52.7%CT opening success

0.54Enemies flashed / flash

5.7%Flash assists

7.81HE damage / grenade

4.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.0957% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–10	0.08	21%	17 Aug →
anubis	5–13	0.03	23%	17 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.02	20%	10 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.02	21%	7 Aug →
vertigo	13–2	0.19	33%	6 Aug →
inferno	15–15	-0.02	12%	5 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.01	23%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	24%	3 Aug →
vertigo	9–6	0.12	20%	3 Aug →
inferno	4–9	0.01	21%	3 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.10	21%	2 Aug →
inferno	16–14	-0.02	13%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.04	25%	1 Aug →
overpass	13–9	0.03	12%	6 Jun →
cache	13–8	0.03	26%	30 May →
cache	13–3	0.07	9%	22 May →
cache	8–13	0.05	21%	20 May →
cache	13–10	0.01	19%	20 May →
cache	13–2	0.04	21%	19 May →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	16%	19 May →
cache	13–6	0.04	14%	19 May →
cache	13–10	-0.05	17%	6 May →
cache	8–13	0.08	30%	4 May →
cache	13–4	0.08	18%	4 May →
cache	13–4	0.09	28%	2 May →
cache	12–12	-0.04	17%	2 May →
cache	13–7	0.03	22%	2 May →
cache	13–3	-0.01	13%	1 May →
cache	6–13	0.03	21%	30 Apr →
cache	13–11	0.02	19%	30 Apr →
cache	13–5	0.09	22%	30 Apr →
cache	6–13	-0.02	27%	30 Apr →
cache	13–6	-0.02	15%	30 Apr →
cache	13–6	0.06	10%	29 Apr →
cache	13–5	0.01	15%	29 Apr →
cache	4–13	0.09	13%	29 Apr →
cache	8–13	0.06	30%	29 Apr →
cache	8–13	-0.04	19%	29 Apr →
vertigo	13–8	0.00	27%	12 Apr →
vertigo	5–13	0.03	33%	12 Apr →
dust2	13–11	0.05	17%	4 Apr →
mirage	11–13	0.06	21%	4 Apr →
nuke	10–13	-0.04	14%	4 Apr →
ancient	10–13	0.01	14%	4 Apr →
dust2	13–16	-0.00	16%	1 Apr →
mirage	5–13	0.01	15%	29 Mar →
office	13–11	-0.01	36%	19 Mar →
office	8–13	0.01	18%	19 Mar →
overpass	13–11	0.03	18%	16 Mar →
overpass	6–13	-0.01	19%	16 Mar →
overpass	13–9	0.09	15%	14 Mar →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	15%	14 Mar →
ancient	13–9	0.13	17%	13 Mar →
vertigo	7–13	0.07	22%	12 Mar →
ancient	12–12	0.05	9%	12 Mar →
nuke	20–22	0.00	14%	10 Mar →
inferno	13–3	0.03	26%	10 Mar →
ancient	13–4	0.04	28%	10 Mar →
inferno	3–13	0.00	32%	10 Mar →
ancient	9–13	0.01	17%	10 Mar →
dust2	13–7	0.03	19%	8 Mar →
ancient	4–13	-0.05	34%	8 Mar →
inferno	6–13	0.04	16%	8 Mar →
nuke	10–13	0.01	24%	8 Mar →
ancient	11–13	0.01	15%	7 Mar →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	26%	6 Mar →
dust2	13–4	0.06	21%	5 Mar →
nuke	16–14	0.04	20%	5 Mar →
dust2	11–13	0.04	15%	5 Mar →
dust2	19–22	-0.03	24%	5 Mar →
inferno	11–13	-0.00	15%	4 Mar →
inferno	15–15	0.02	29%	4 Mar →
ancient	1–13	-0.02	21%	4 Mar →
ancient	13–10	-0.04	23%	4 Mar →
dust2	13–5	-0.09	14%	4 Mar →
inferno	13–5	0.03	32%	4 Mar →
anubis	13–10	0.10	19%	2 Mar →
inferno	15–15	0.04	22%	2 Mar →
inferno	9–5	0.08	39%	2 Mar →
ancient	13–11	-0.00	25%	2 Mar →
nuke	9–13	0.02	10%	2 Mar →
overpass	13–5	0.08	21%	2 Mar →
overpass	7–13	0.07	24%	1 Mar →
overpass	8–13	-0.00	13%	1 Mar →
inferno	13–6	0.06	23%	27 Feb →
nuke	13–11	0.03	11%	27 Feb →
ancient	14–16	-0.02	14%	27 Feb →
overpass	11–13	-0.00	15%	27 Feb →
ancient	13–5	0.06	16%	27 Feb →
nuke	15–15	-0.01	12%	26 Feb →
ancient	13–9	0.05	18%	25 Feb →
mirage	6–13	0.04	26%	25 Feb →
ancient	13–2	0.16	18%	25 Feb →
ancient	15–15	0.04	13%	24 Feb →
inferno	13–9	0.01	14%	24 Feb →
nuke	13–9	0.05	23%	23 Feb →
nuke	14–16	0.02	22%	22 Feb →
nuke	13–10	0.05	14%	22 Feb →
nuke	11–13	-0.05	9%	21 Feb →
nuke	15–15	-0.01	12%	17 Feb →