snoop

snoop — CS2 Stats

NZ76561198174235226[U:1:213969498]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

779Tracked matches56%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,269Purple band · top ~15.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8585 of 16023 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsnoopFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER18,269 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning69
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY474310Last 10047%Win rateLWWLWWLWTT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.0
Aggression9.9
Utility4.5
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels5.7
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 42% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning6.9
Utility4.5
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels5.7
Win Impact6.9

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time538ms−86ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms
Headshot accuracy23.9%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 21.2% → last ⅓ avg 23.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.32Best rating — vertigo 9–1
133Biggest win — nuke
4Longest win streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

poseidonBest map · 60% over 10infernoWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB189950%0.04
debrisC1771041%0.03
ancientB115645%0.01
dust2B105550%0.02
infernoD103730%0.04
poseidonA106460%0.05
nukeA95456%0.01
cacheC94544%0.01
vertigo32167%0.14
anubis21150%0.02
office1010%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

90Matches
57%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
93.7ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1369%1.5718.1
Ancient862%1.1214.3
Dust2475%1.2621.3
Nuke333%1.2824.7
Cache10%1.2520.0
Anubis1100%2.0016.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.5%Headshot accuracy
39.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
531msReaction time
42.0%T opening success
63.9%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
12.31HE damage / grenade
5.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–16-0.0220%28 Aug
ancient13–110.0219%28 Aug
dust213–90.1119%28 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0526%27 Aug
nuke13–90.1022%25 Aug
mirage13–50.1434%25 Aug
inferno13–160.1125%25 Aug
cache13–100.0133%24 Aug
mirage15–150.0136%24 Aug
inferno15–150.0016%23 Aug
cache13–70.0618%23 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0012%22 Aug
dust213–40.0428%22 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0317%22 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0511%22 Aug
mirage16–120.1017%22 Aug
dust213–110.0714%22 Aug
nuke10–130.0224%21 Aug
dust27–13-0.0118%16 Aug
anubis7–130.0428%16 Aug
ancient12–160.0932%16 Aug
vertigo9–10.3233%16 Aug
debris4–9-0.0016%16 Aug
dust28–13-0.0127%15 Aug
mirage13–50.0123%15 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0021%15 Aug
cache13–70.1237%15 Aug
mirage11–130.0829%14 Aug
ancient11–130.0017%14 Aug
ancient10–130.0727%13 Aug
dust213–40.0927%13 Aug
dust213–70.0333%12 Aug
mirage13–40.0729%12 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0123%12 Aug
ancient13–60.0618%12 Aug
poseidon9–50.0543%12 Aug
debris2–9-0.1324%12 Aug
poseidon8–80.1444%11 Aug
nuke3–9-0.1414%11 Aug
debris9–60.1211%11 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0019%10 Aug
mirage11–130.0920%10 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0022%10 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0133%9 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0436%9 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0428%9 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0321%9 Aug
cache13–16-0.0125%8 Aug
nuke13–30.0138%8 Aug
nuke13–40.0126%8 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0115%8 Aug
mirage13–90.0324%8 Aug
cache6–13-0.019%8 Aug
mirage13–80.0623%30 Jul
vertigo13–70.0533%30 Jul
debris3–9-0.1313%27 Jul
dust211–130.0316%27 Jul
cache9–13-0.0829%27 Jul
mirage15–150.0324%27 Jul
debris7–9-0.0522%26 Jul
poseidon9–50.1213%26 Jul
debris9–3-0.0138%26 Jul
poseidon9–5-0.0155%26 Jul
inferno8–80.0421%26 Jul
poseidon3–9-0.0435%26 Jul
debris8–80.0416%26 Jul
inferno9–70.0413%26 Jul
debris9–50.0623%26 Jul
inferno8–80.0318%25 Jul
ancient10–130.0219%25 Jul
dust23–13-0.0514%25 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0316%25 Jul
inferno9–50.1227%24 Jul
nuke9–50.0414%24 Jul
debris6–9-0.0427%24 Jul
poseidon8–80.090%24 Jul
debris4–9-0.0816%24 Jul
debris9–40.0416%24 Jul
vertigo5–90.0453%24 Jul
nuke16–120.047%24 Jul
mirage13–160.0117%24 Jul
office8–130.0724%23 Jul
cache11–13-0.0233%23 Jul
inferno7–50.1110%23 Jul
anubis13–7-0.015%23 Jul
poseidon9–60.1021%23 Jul
debris6–90.0714%23 Jul
cache13–40.0920%21 Jul
cache9–13-0.0410%12 Jul
dust210–13-0.0717%12 Jul
mirage13–110.0527%11 Jul
mirage13–40.1224%11 Jul
poseidon0–9-0.1867%11 Jul
debris9–70.0913%11 Jul
debris9–60.1315%11 Jul
debris9–00.2213%11 Jul
poseidon9–30.1453%11 Jul
debris7–90.1111%11 Jul
poseidon9–10.1232%11 Jul
debris8–80.1221%11 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →