ŜυＮήY — CS2 Stats

76561198172115655[U:1:211849927]✓ No bans

3,837Tracked matches47%Win rate2022Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingClutch Specialist

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69

Positioning59

Utility6

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–45–5Last 10050%Win rateLWLLWLLTWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion well above par.

Aim6.9

Aggression10.0

Utility0.6

Positioning5.9

Opening Duels4.7

Clutch10.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like device 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 602ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9

Positioning5.9

Utility0.6

Mechanics4.5

Opening Duels4.7

Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time614ms+0ms

first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 614ms

Headshot accuracy20.7%+2.4%

first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — office 13–6

13–0Biggest win — italy

6Longest win streak

3–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

1Overtime games

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 62% over 26trainWeakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	B	37	19–18	51%	0.00
office	A	26	16–10	62%	0.06
inferno	D	10	3–7	30%	-0.02
anubis	A	5	3–2	60%	-0.01
train	D	5	1–4	20%	-0.01
cache	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.01
overpass	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.00
ancient	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.03
poseidon	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.03
alpine	—	1	1–0	100%	0.10
italy	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.00
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.00
mirage	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

11Matches

45%Win rate

0.86Avg K/D

76.7ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	3	100%	1.16	16.0
Nuke	3	0%	0.60	10.3
Anubis	2	50%	0.57	9.0
Dust2	1	100%	1.33	16.0
Ancient	1	0%	0.69	11.0
Inferno	1	0%	1.06	18.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy

34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.2%Spray accuracy

70.5%Counter-strafing

8.3°Preaim

602msReaction time

34.1%T opening success

63.8%CT opening success

0.00Enemies flashed / flash

0.0%Flash assists

5.87HE damage / grenade

0.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.1345% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Train

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Train callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	8–13	0.03	16%	12 Aug →
office	13–10	0.00	16%	12 Aug →
nuke	0–9	-0.21	4%	17 Jul →
inferno	4–9	-0.18	17%	17 Jul →
office	13–11	0.12	26%	17 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.01	19%	17 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.04	19%	16 Jul →
inferno	8–8	-0.03	15%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.07	18%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.03	19%	16 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.03	20%	15 Jul →
office	13–10	0.06	31%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.01	16%	5 Jul →
overpass	14–16	-0.01	14%	5 Jul →
office	13–7	0.06	19%	21 Jun →
nuke	8–13	0.02	22%	21 Jun →
cache	1–4	-0.03	50%	21 Jun →
nuke	1–13	-0.07	27%	20 Jun →
office	9–13	0.08	31%	20 Jun →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	20%	20 Jun →
train	10–13	-0.05	20%	20 Jun →
office	5–13	0.09	18%	20 Jun →
nuke	9–13	0.10	22%	20 Jun →
nuke	13–11	0.03	14%	19 Jun →
office	13–4	0.13	17%	19 Jun →
office	13–2	0.11	29%	19 Jun →
nuke	13–1	0.05	33%	18 Jun →
inferno	3–13	-0.01	22%	18 Jun →
train	13–6	0.02	17%	18 Jun →
train	11–13	-0.05	16%	18 Jun →
nuke	3–13	-0.10	6%	18 Jun →
office	3–13	-0.10	17%	18 Jun →
alpine	13–7	0.10	32%	15 Jun →
inferno	6–9	-0.03	36%	15 Jun →
nuke	3–13	-0.02	8%	13 Jun →
overpass	11–13	0.04	18%	13 Jun →
cache	13–6	0.03	19%	13 Jun →
poseidon	4–9	-0.04	12%	10 Jun →
nuke	13–5	0.04	14%	10 Jun →
office	7–13	0.05	21%	9 Jun →
nuke	13–6	0.16	19%	9 Jun →
italy	13–0	-0.00	11%	8 Jun →
nuke	13–2	0.05	45%	8 Jun →
office	13–6	0.21	32%	8 Jun →
office	13–9	0.13	24%	7 Jun →
poseidon	6–9	-0.02	10%	7 Jun →
office	8–13	0.02	13%	7 Jun →
nuke	10–13	0.08	27%	7 Jun →
vertigo	9–13	-0.00	15%	7 Jun →
office	12–12	0.08	18%	6 Jun →
cache	5–13	-0.05	13%	6 Jun →
nuke	8–13	0.07	16%	6 Jun →
office	9–13	0.03	16%	3 Jun →
nuke	6–13	-0.00	22%	3 Jun →
nuke	13–7	0.06	18%	3 Jun →
anubis	13–9	-0.01	15%	2 Jun →
anubis	13–9	-0.03	19%	2 Jun →
nuke	4–13	0.02	24%	2 Jun →
inferno	4–13	-0.05	15%	31 May →
nuke	10–13	-0.06	9%	31 May →
nuke	13–9	-0.04	13%	31 May →
nuke	13–9	-0.00	13%	31 May →
nuke	13–10	0.07	16%	31 May →
office	13–10	-0.01	13%	31 May →
nuke	13–6	-0.05	16%	31 May →
inferno	2–13	-0.04	39%	31 May →
office	13–11	0.06	21%	31 May →
nuke	9–3	-0.02	18%	31 May →
inferno	9–3	-0.01	9%	31 May →
inferno	9–2	0.20	31%	31 May →
office	13–10	0.14	23%	30 May →
anubis	13–6	0.00	23%	29 May →
nuke	7–13	-0.08	11%	29 May →
nuke	9–5	-0.03	3%	29 May →
nuke	13–10	-0.01	25%	28 May →
office	13–9	0.01	8%	27 May →
anubis	6–13	-0.01	12%	27 May →
office	13–1	0.02	13%	27 May →
office	13–7	0.02	16%	26 May →
overpass	13–5	-0.03	11%	26 May →
nuke	4–13	0.04	16%	25 May →
office	13–5	0.06	24%	25 May →
mirage	4–13	0.02	24%	25 May →
office	7–3	0.09	30%	25 May →
nuke	6–13	-0.08	17%	25 May →
nuke	13–7	0.04	25%	25 May →
train	3–13	-0.02	41%	24 May →
nuke	13–8	0.11	17%	24 May →
office	12–12	0.06	11%	24 May →
nuke	13–7	0.05	14%	24 May →
ancient	4–13	-0.08	26%	24 May →
nuke	6–9	-0.06	15%	24 May →
train	6–13	0.04	18%	23 May →
office	12–12	0.00	29%	23 May →
nuke	12–12	0.01	16%	23 May →
office	11–13	-0.03	13%	23 May →
nuke	13–10	0.02	16%	23 May →
ancient	13–4	-0.02	20%	23 May →
nuke	13–8	0.03	9%	22 May →
overpass	13–10	-0.01	20%	20 May →