โ˜ ๐™Ž๐™ƒ๐™๐™Ž๐™ƒโ˜ 

โ˜ ๐™Ž๐™ƒ๐™๐™Ž๐™ƒโ˜  โ€” CS2 Stats

JP76561198170887255[U:1:210621527]Steam profile โ†—โœ“ No bans

1,622Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating10,989Blue band ยท top ~49.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#22563 of 31636 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGโ˜ ๐™Ž๐™ƒ๐™๐™Ž๐™ƒโ˜ FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER10,989 ยท Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning51
Utility42

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48โ€“51โ€“1Last 10048%Win rateWWLWWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate ยท +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler โ€” Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.1
Aggression7.4
Utility4.2
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game โ€” the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 32% on T โ€” the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.1
Utility4.2
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first โ…“ avg 0.01 โ†’ last โ…“ avg 0.01
Reaction time513msโˆ’55ms
first โ…“ avg 568ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 513ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%+1.7%
first โ…“ avg 17.2% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating โ€” ancient 13โ€“9
13โ€“1Biggest win โ€” anubis
5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
5โ€“15In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map ยท 64% over 14infernoWeakest map ยท 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2512โ€“1348%0.01
mirageD248โ€“1633%-0.00
ancientA149โ€“564%0.03
anubisA138โ€“562%0.02
nukeB126โ€“650%0.01
infernoD72โ€“529%-0.01
cacheA53โ€“260%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

35Matches
34%Win rate
0.72Avg K/D
64.8ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage714%0.8213.4
Anubis580%0.9212.8
Inferno475%1.2614.0
Ancient30%0.599.3
Vertigo333%0.507.0
Dust2250%0.609.5
Nuke10%0.459.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
75.0%Counter-strafing
7.3ยฐPreaim
511msReaction time
31.5%T opening success
50.2%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
7.07HE damage / grenade
4.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.5181% โ€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy โ†’Inferno grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13โ€“60.0511%27 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“80.0320%27 Aug โ†’
mirage6โ€“13-0.0318%27 Aug โ†’
mirage16โ€“13-0.0810%26 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“90.1423%26 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“100.0516%25 Aug โ†’
mirage9โ€“13-0.0314%24 Aug โ†’
mirage4โ€“13-0.0313%21 Aug โ†’
mirage10โ€“13-0.0413%21 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“40.0236%21 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“160.0321%20 Aug โ†’
cache8โ€“13-0.0117%20 Aug โ†’
cache11โ€“13-0.0126%20 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“80.1422%19 Aug โ†’
mirage10โ€“13-0.0623%19 Aug โ†’
inferno3โ€“13-0.0714%19 Aug โ†’
anubis16โ€“120.0212%18 Aug โ†’
dust211โ€“13-0.0612%18 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“4-0.0333%18 Aug โ†’
mirage5โ€“13-0.0319%18 Aug โ†’
mirage6โ€“130.0221%18 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“9-0.0015%17 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“80.0720%17 Aug โ†’
mirage14โ€“16-0.0516%17 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“80.0923%17 Aug โ†’
dust211โ€“130.0215%16 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“5-0.0150%16 Aug โ†’
anubis11โ€“130.1212%16 Aug โ†’
dust210โ€“13-0.0324%16 Aug โ†’
dust26โ€“13-0.077%16 Aug โ†’
dust210โ€“130.0512%16 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“160.0422%15 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“80.0118%15 Aug โ†’
inferno6โ€“13-0.0517%15 Aug โ†’
cache16โ€“13-0.0227%15 Aug โ†’
ancient10โ€“130.054%14 Aug โ†’
mirage7โ€“130.0110%14 Aug โ†’
ancient11โ€“13-0.0119%14 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“90.1027%14 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“80.009%14 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“70.0245%14 Aug โ†’
mirage11โ€“13-0.0424%14 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“110.0715%14 Aug โ†’
mirage8โ€“130.0213%14 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“6-0.0133%14 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“70.0614%14 Aug โ†’
mirage6โ€“130.0134%14 Aug โ†’
dust29โ€“130.005%13 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“70.0318%13 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“7-0.0215%13 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“2-0.0220%13 Aug โ†’
anubis16โ€“14-0.0017%13 Aug โ†’
dust216โ€“130.1014%13 Aug โ†’
dust210โ€“130.0721%12 Aug โ†’
ancient11โ€“130.0113%12 Aug โ†’
dust211โ€“130.046%12 Aug โ†’
mirage11โ€“13-0.0113%12 Aug โ†’
ancient11โ€“130.0516%11 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“100.0233%10 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“10.0120%10 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“90.0112%10 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“10.0623%10 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“5-0.0321%9 Aug โ†’
dust26โ€“13-0.0521%9 Aug โ†’
dust210โ€“13-0.0628%7 Aug โ†’
nuke8โ€“13-0.028%6 Aug โ†’
anubis10โ€“130.0117%6 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“10-0.0217%6 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“70.0918%6 Aug โ†’
mirage9โ€“13-0.0218%6 Aug โ†’
dust25โ€“13-0.0011%5 Aug โ†’
mirage5โ€“13-0.0112%5 Aug โ†’
anubis11โ€“130.0118%5 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“11-0.0422%5 Aug โ†’
dust27โ€“13-0.0315%5 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“7-0.0213%5 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“8-0.0117%4 Aug โ†’
dust23โ€“130.0123%4 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“80.0510%4 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“90.0228%4 Aug โ†’
inferno15โ€“150.0212%4 Aug โ†’
nuke1โ€“13-0.1011%4 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“100.0111%4 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“110.0226%4 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“70.0416%3 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“100.0314%3 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“10.1233%3 Aug โ†’
inferno8โ€“130.0014%3 Aug โ†’
mirage11โ€“130.0527%3 Aug โ†’
anubis7โ€“13-0.0520%3 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“3-0.035%3 Aug โ†’
nuke7โ€“13-0.0311%2 Aug โ†’
ancient9โ€“13-0.0517%2 Aug โ†’
anubis11โ€“130.0517%1 Aug โ†’
nuke5โ€“6-0.030%1 Aug โ†’
inferno5โ€“13-0.0132%31 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“50.0925%31 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“110.0111%31 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“100.0114%31 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“70.0330%31 Jul โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’