DooMi — CS2 Stats

76561198170682514[U:1:210416786]

1,826Tracked matches32%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingAggressive Rifler

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim74

Positioning57

Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY34–52–14Last 10034%Win rateLLLLWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.4

Aggression7.2

Utility5.0

Positioning5.7

Opening Duels2.5

Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4

Positioning5.7

Utility5.0

Mechanics4.0

Opening Duels3.8

Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time524ms−40ms

first ⅓ avg 564ms → last ⅓ avg 524ms

Headshot accuracy17.5%+0.3%

first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 17.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — eldorado 9–3

13–0Biggest win — shelter

4Longest win streak

L4Current streak

4–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

shelterBest map · 60% over 5ancientWeakest map · 0% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
office	D	13	4–9	31%	-0.00
dust2	D	12	2–10	17%	0.03
cache	B	10	5–5	50%	0.02
overpass	C	7	3–4	43%	0.04
mirage	D	7	2–5	29%	0.02
nuke	D	7	2–5	29%	0.05
anubis	D	6	1–5	17%	0.02
vertigo	B	6	3–3	50%	0.08
ancient	D	5	0–5	0%	0.05
shelter	A	5	3–2	60%	0.09
boulder	D	5	1–4	20%	0.00
fachwerk	C	5	2–3	40%	0.02
italy	—	4	3–1	75%	0.11
inferno	—	4	1–3	25%	0.03
train	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.00
eldorado	—	1	1–0	100%	0.24
debris	—	1	0–1	0%	0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

913Matches

52%Win rate

1.07Avg K/D

84.3ADR

36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

18%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	6	50%	0.99	16.8
Ancient	6	50%	1.01	17.3
Nuke	4	100%	1.92	16.3
Overpass	2	100%	1.28	19.5
Inferno	1	100%	1.25	20.0
Cache	1	100%	1.75	7.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy

35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.7%Spray accuracy

68.1%Counter-strafing

8.3°Preaim

520msReaction time

20.0%T opening success

60.3%CT opening success

0.50Enemies flashed / flash

5.9%Flash assists

6.03HE damage / grenade

11.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4987 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 19.9999% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
office	6–13	0.03	13%	27 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.01	13%	26 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.00	10%	26 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.04	27%	26 Aug →
cache	13–1	0.08	14%	26 Aug →
overpass	13–7	0.14	13%	25 Aug →
office	6–13	-0.03	19%	24 Aug →
office	2–1	-0.09	67%	24 Aug →
vertigo	13–6	0.05	12%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.07	29%	23 Aug →
overpass	7–13	-0.02	22%	23 Aug →
office	6–13	-0.01	29%	18 Aug →
shelter	5–13	0.07	13%	17 Aug →
office	5–13	-0.01	20%	17 Aug →
office	4–13	-0.04	31%	14 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.08	16%	14 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.09	5%	14 Aug →
boulder	10–13	0.04	15%	13 Aug →
office	13–2	0.06	10%	13 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.04	24%	13 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.02	12%	11 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.06	4%	11 Aug →
italy	12–12	0.15	13%	9 Aug →
overpass	10–13	-0.02	16%	9 Aug →
vertigo	7–13	0.04	18%	7 Aug →
inferno	5–13	0.08	19%	7 Aug →
mirage	3–13	0.10	12%	6 Aug →
train	13–5	0.04	8%	6 Aug →
dust2	2–11	0.00	13%	6 Aug →
office	13–10	0.03	22%	5 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.08	16%	5 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.00	13%	5 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.02	11%	5 Aug →
anubis	12–12	-0.01	17%	4 Aug →
fachwerk	8–13	0.00	31%	4 Aug →
vertigo	9–13	0.12	22%	4 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.01	26%	4 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.06	15%	4 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	20%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.13	18%	4 Aug →
cache	12–12	-0.03	23%	2 Aug →
overpass	13–8	0.11	23%	1 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.07	21%	1 Aug →
boulder	6–13	0.04	13%	1 Aug →
italy	13–10	0.03	11%	29 Jul →
italy	6–0	0.20	6%	29 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.02	20%	29 Jul →
inferno	12–12	0.01	14%	29 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.08	16%	29 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.06	31%	29 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.01	22%	29 Jul →
overpass	7–13	0.03	18%	29 Jul →
vertigo	11–13	0.09	22%	29 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.02	21%	28 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.02	32%	28 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.06	18%	28 Jul →
vertigo	13–4	0.13	20%	28 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.01	26%	27 Jul →
fachwerk	13–11	0.01	13%	27 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.00	18%	27 Jul →
ancient	12–12	0.04	17%	27 Jul →
office	13–7	0.02	17%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.01	18%	26 Jul →
office	6–13	-0.01	15%	25 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.01	11%	25 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	18%	25 Jul →
anubis	6–13	0.04	10%	25 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.04	17%	25 Jul →
mirage	12–12	-0.00	13%	25 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.06	19%	22 Jul →
anubis	12–12	0.04	15%	22 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.05	27%	22 Jul →
dust2	1–13	0.03	15%	21 Jul →
fachwerk	10–13	-0.00	26%	21 Jul →
office	7–13	-0.01	20%	21 Jul →
overpass	13–5	0.04	16%	21 Jul →
fachwerk	13–2	0.05	11%	20 Jul →
boulder	5–13	0.02	17%	20 Jul →
boulder	0–9	-0.10	38%	20 Jul →
train	7–13	-0.05	13%	20 Jul →
overpass	6–13	-0.02	11%	20 Jul →
vertigo	13–9	0.07	16%	20 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.03	13%	20 Jul →
italy	13–1	0.08	26%	20 Jul →
shelter	13–10	0.07	19%	20 Jul →
office	3–13	0.04	26%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.04	12%	19 Jul →
shelter	13–10	0.06	20%	19 Jul →
shelter	12–12	0.12	21%	18 Jul →
office	9–13	-0.00	18%	18 Jul →
shelter	13–0	0.15	29%	18 Jul →
fachwerk	12–12	0.04	16%	18 Jul →
boulder	13–0	0.01	0%	18 Jul →
eldorado	9–3	0.24	16%	18 Jul →
debris	8–8	0.08	10%	18 Jul →
ancient	12–12	0.05	12%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.03	13%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.04	20%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–1	-0.03	12%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.05	15%	15 Jul →