so ez

so ez — CS2 Stats

76561198168858734[U:1:208593006]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

620Tracked matches50%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,518Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4204 of 25068 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,273 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGso ezFACEITLevel 8 · 1,273 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER24,518 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning55
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5446Last 10054%Win rateLWLWLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.4
Aggression7.6
Utility5.4
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch4.6

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 613ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.5
Utility5.4
Mechanics9.0
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time623ms−3ms
first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 623ms
Headshot accuracy21.3%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 21.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — nuke 9–1
130Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
96In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 89% over 9dust2Weakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB54282652%-0.01
ancientS1510567%0.01
anubisS98189%-0.01
dust2D72529%-0.03
cacheD62433%-0.01
inferno41325%-0.04
overpass31233%0.01
nuke220100%0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

165Matches
55%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
78.3ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8064%1.1115.1
Ancient2560%1.1816.5
Dust21644%1.1617.1
Anubis1573%1.0215.5
Cache1118%0.9014.4
Inferno1030%1.0716.1
Overpass30%0.8013.3
Nuke333%0.9514.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.5%Spray accuracy
90.6%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
613msReaction time
33.3%T opening success
46.3%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
8.39HE damage / grenade
11.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.2788% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage14–16-0.0120%27 Aug
cache13–10-0.0330%27 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0114%26 Aug
mirage19–17-0.0116%26 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0518%26 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0230%20 Aug
mirage13–70.1228%18 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0531%16 Aug
inferno4–9-0.0721%18 Jul
nuke9–10.1937%18 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0520%18 Jul
inferno9–20.0633%12 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0318%12 Jun
inferno2–9-0.1145%12 Jun
overpass9–30.1314%12 Jun
nuke9–70.1323%12 Jun
dust213–90.0216%12 Jun
ancient8–13-0.076%11 Jun
mirage13–50.0429%11 Jun
dust211–13-0.0320%11 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0119%11 Jun
ancient13–60.0211%10 Jun
dust213–9-0.0216%10 Jun
mirage16–140.0113%10 Jun
anubis13–10.0720%10 Jun
mirage16–140.019%9 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0518%9 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0312%9 Jun
mirage13–70.0245%9 Jun
mirage13–16-0.0419%8 Jun
dust29–130.0013%8 Jun
mirage13–40.0129%8 Jun
mirage10–130.0010%16 May
ancient6–130.0026%16 May
mirage16–12-0.0622%16 May
overpass2–13-0.166%16 May
mirage8–13-0.0123%15 May
mirage8–13-0.0134%15 May
dust212–16-0.0824%15 May
cache6–13-0.0218%14 May
mirage13–10-0.0827%14 May
mirage11–13-0.0815%12 May
mirage13–16-0.0528%12 May
mirage6–13-0.0232%12 May
ancient13–0-0.0224%11 May
mirage13–20.0927%11 May
mirage7–13-0.0231%11 May
mirage13–10-0.0220%11 May
mirage13–100.0027%11 May
ancient13–10-0.0026%11 May
mirage6–13-0.0427%10 May
mirage16–120.0115%10 May
mirage13–10-0.0416%10 May
anubis13–10-0.0126%10 May
mirage5–13-0.0533%10 May
ancient13–9-0.0320%10 May
mirage5–13-0.0832%10 May
mirage13–100.0525%10 May
anubis13–10-0.0213%9 May
anubis13–5-0.0218%9 May
mirage13–110.0725%9 May
ancient19–16-0.0122%9 May
mirage17–190.0120%8 May
mirage13–100.0722%8 May
ancient13–70.0413%8 May
anubis13–5-0.0925%8 May
mirage4–13-0.0420%8 May
dust211–13-0.0327%7 May
mirage13–100.0014%6 May
overpass9–130.0626%6 May
ancient13–9-0.0318%6 May
mirage10–13-0.0436%6 May
anubis4–13-0.1212%6 May
mirage22–190.0320%5 May
ancient13–40.0919%5 May
ancient8–130.0015%5 May
cache5–13-0.0228%4 May
mirage16–14-0.0218%4 May
mirage13–70.0323%4 May
mirage13–100.0226%4 May
mirage13–10-0.0424%4 May
mirage8–130.0718%3 May
mirage16–120.0717%3 May
dust29–13-0.0526%2 May
anubis13–110.0018%2 May
mirage10–13-0.0418%2 May
cache14–160.0014%2 May
mirage3–13-0.0621%2 May
anubis13–80.0420%2 May
ancient13–110.0728%1 May
ancient7–13-0.0419%1 May
mirage13–30.0428%1 May
cache9–13-0.0128%30 Apr
anubis13–50.0415%30 Apr
mirage9–130.0028%30 Apr
ancient13–30.1027%30 Apr
cache13–70.0427%30 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0928%29 Apr
mirage13–10.0516%29 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0223%29 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →