K20_DE5 — CS2 Stats

76561198165642050[U:1:205376322]✓ No bans

639Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,201Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2260 of 6995 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,670 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGK20_DE5FACEITLevel 8 · 1,670 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,201 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning52
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD39592Last 10039%Win rateLWLLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.3
Aggression4.7
Utility4.6
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.2
Utility4.6
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time511ms−113ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 511ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%−3.5%
first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — mirage 5–0
131Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
54In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 63% over 8nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC39142536%0.03
dust2B26121446%0.05
ancientC125742%0.01
infernoA85363%0.04
nukeD72529%0.03
cache41325%0.03
anubis4040%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,496Matches
50%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
66.2ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust210%1.1219.0
Inferno10%0.7311.0
Vertigo10%0.609.0
Train10%0.7515.0
Mirage10%0.8218.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.4%Spray accuracy
79.2%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
513msReaction time
28.3%T opening success
47.7%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
8.17HE damage / grenade
5.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.321% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–130.0718%27 Aug
ancient13–30.0315%27 Aug
dust210–130.0614%27 Aug
ancient0–13-0.0419%27 Aug
dust22–130.0413%27 Aug
mirage6–130.0213%27 Aug
dust27–130.0419%27 Aug
ancient3–00.1433%27 Aug
ancient12–160.079%27 Aug
mirage6–0-0.0240%25 Aug
dust213–90.0033%25 Aug
dust210–130.0026%25 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0621%25 Aug
dust213–110.0433%23 Aug
cache8–13-0.009%20 Aug
mirage13–110.1310%20 Aug
mirage5–130.1114%20 Aug
mirage9–130.0615%20 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0121%19 Aug
dust25–130.0431%19 Aug
dust24–13-0.0022%19 Aug
mirage16–12-0.009%19 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0019%17 Aug
dust213–90.0517%17 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0018%17 Aug
mirage0–2-0.030%16 Aug
nuke0–13-0.1211%16 Aug
inferno13–80.0514%16 Aug
ancient16–12-0.0013%15 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0311%15 Aug
mirage13–30.0521%15 Aug
mirage13–20.0716%15 Aug
ancient11–130.0013%13 Aug
nuke13–20.1623%13 Aug
mirage13–70.0529%13 Aug
dust211–130.1411%13 Aug
nuke13–100.0412%13 Aug
mirage13–90.1127%12 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0212%12 Aug
dust213–20.1117%12 Aug
mirage13–4-0.018%11 Aug
dust210–130.0116%11 Aug
inferno13–60.0117%10 Aug
anubis9–130.0319%10 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0313%10 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0210%9 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0215%9 Aug
mirage13–80.1013%9 Aug
mirage13–100.0915%8 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0513%7 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0416%5 Aug
cache10–130.0923%4 Aug
nuke9–130.087%4 Aug
dust213–40.1433%2 Aug
mirage13–10.1032%2 Aug
inferno10–130.0313%2 Aug
nuke10–130.0119%2 Aug
mirage10–130.0113%1 Aug
dust210–13-0.0415%1 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0326%31 Jul
inferno13–90.0624%31 Jul
mirage8–130.0223%30 Jul
inferno9–130.0013%30 Jul
ancient5–130.0223%29 Jul
mirage5–130.0423%29 Jul
dust213–30.1526%29 Jul
dust213–5-0.0122%28 Jul
mirage5–00.2014%28 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0233%28 Jul
mirage6–130.0318%28 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0220%27 Jul
inferno8–130.0122%27 Jul
dust213–100.0317%27 Jul
nuke7–130.1013%26 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0714%26 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0723%26 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0232%25 Jul
mirage13–80.0019%23 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0124%23 Jul
dust26–13-0.0138%23 Jul
dust216–140.0110%23 Jul
mirage3–130.0214%22 Jul
dust21–13-0.0326%22 Jul
mirage5–130.0119%22 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0124%22 Jul
mirage0–5-0.030%21 Jul
dust213–70.0513%21 Jul
mirage5–130.0717%21 Jul
dust29–130.0117%21 Jul
inferno13–50.1318%20 Jul
anubis0–4-0.06100%20 Jul
dust212–120.0514%19 Jul
dust213–40.1520%19 Jul
cache13–70.0713%18 Jul
mirage13–160.0414%18 Jul
dust216–140.1017%17 Jul
dust210–130.0618%17 Jul
mirage9–130.1426%17 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0119%16 Jul
cache4–13-0.0321%16 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →