Beef Flap lover — CS2 Stats

76561198165177150[U:1:204911422]✓ No bans

2,702Tracked matches48%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,617Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3303 of 10863 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,895 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBeef Flap loverFACEITLevel 9 · 1,895 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER22,617 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning61
Utility76

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53443Last 10053%Win rateLWWLLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.2
Aggression7.7
Utility7.6
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 76 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning6.1
Utility7.6
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time553ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 553ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%−1.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — mirage 13–4
130Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
59In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 17mirageWeakest map · 36% over 25
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2591636%0.02
dust2B21111052%0.04
cacheS1712571%0.03
anubisB158753%0.02
ancientS107370%0.02
infernoB63350%0.01
nukeB63350%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

359Matches
53%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
85.4ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11159%1.1917.7
Dust27450%1.2116.9
Anubis5254%1.1117.6
Inferno4344%1.1318.4
Ancient4252%1.1916.6
Nuke1850%1.2218.7
Train667%0.7814.3
Cache667%1.0917.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
38.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.4%Spray accuracy
77.4%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
547msReaction time
31.0%T opening success
56.9%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
9.8%Flash assists
11.46HE damage / grenade
19.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.0146% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage14–16-0.0120%26 Aug
cache13–60.0616%26 Aug
mirage13–90.1432%26 Aug
inferno7–9-0.0231%26 Aug
mirage5–130.0323%24 Aug
anubis22–20-0.0421%23 Aug
mirage13–100.0127%23 Aug
dust212–16-0.0318%18 Aug
dust29–130.0122%18 Aug
dust29–130.0317%17 Aug
cache10–13-0.0113%17 Aug
cache13–40.0219%17 Aug
dust213–100.0225%17 Aug
inferno9–130.0018%16 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0514%16 Aug
cache11–130.0616%16 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0211%12 Aug
anubis13–80.0521%11 Aug
cache5–13-0.027%11 Aug
dust29–130.0311%11 Aug
inferno13–80.1130%11 Aug
dust213–90.0715%10 Aug
mirage9–130.0018%9 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0621%7 Aug
anubis13–80.0427%6 Aug
dust215–150.0126%5 Aug
mirage13–40.0512%5 Aug
dust213–30.0613%5 Aug
anubis10–130.0222%4 Aug
nuke14–160.0410%3 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0320%3 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0715%2 Aug
anubis7–130.0818%2 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0718%2 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0220%2 Aug
cache13–10-0.0019%2 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0122%2 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0413%1 Aug
cache13–2-0.0411%1 Aug
mirage11–130.0427%1 Aug
dust213–80.0721%1 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0120%1 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0113%1 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0310%31 Jul
mirage11–130.0514%31 Jul
inferno9–10.0653%30 Jul
dust29–130.0621%30 Jul
cache13–110.0622%30 Jul
cache13–90.0125%29 Jul
cache16–120.1319%29 Jul
nuke13–70.0526%29 Jul
dust213–90.0214%29 Jul
nuke13–160.0219%28 Jul
dust210–13-0.0118%28 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0015%27 Jul
dust24–130.0330%26 Jul
cache13–60.0722%26 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0110%26 Jul
ancient7–130.0011%26 Jul
anubis13–110.1411%26 Jul
dust213–90.0515%24 Jul
mirage11–130.0515%23 Jul
anubis13–30.0716%23 Jul
cache12–160.0213%23 Jul
ancient13–110.0516%23 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0148%23 Jul
cache13–50.0527%23 Jul
ancient13–60.0229%22 Jul
mirage8–130.0515%22 Jul
dust213–40.0819%22 Jul
mirage13–60.0125%22 Jul
cache13–16-0.0310%22 Jul
mirage7–130.0212%21 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0115%21 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0018%21 Jul
mirage13–40.1821%21 Jul
dust216–120.0121%20 Jul
ancient13–50.1633%20 Jul
mirage13–30.0722%20 Jul
mirage15–150.0217%20 Jul
dust213–100.0726%20 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0214%19 Jul
dust215–150.0711%19 Jul
ancient13–50.0416%19 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0213%19 Jul
cache13–30.0633%15 Jul
dust213–00.1519%15 Jul
cache13–80.0118%15 Jul
dust213–100.0329%14 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0529%14 Jul
ancient13–70.0114%14 Jul
anubis13–20.1043%14 Jul
cache13–70.1317%14 Jul
mirage13–50.0317%14 Jul
mirage9–130.0123%14 Jul
ancient16–120.0220%13 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0515%13 Jul
dust29–13-0.0232%13 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0222%13 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0620%13 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →