mämmimies — CS2 Stats

76561198162741564[U:1:202475836]

445Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,060Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8876 of 30762 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,690 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmämmimiesFACEITLevel 8 · 1,690 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,060 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning50
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53434Last 10053%Win rateWWLWWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.3
Aggression4.8
Utility5.5
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch4.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.0
Utility5.5
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time490ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 516ms → last ⅓ avg 490ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 13.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — poseidon 9–0
131Biggest win — inferno
6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 11dust2Weakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2012860%0.01
infernoC2081240%0.01
ancientB189950%-0.00
anubisS118373%0.02
dust2D93633%0.00
cacheA74357%0.02
mirageS64267%0.03
vertigo41325%-0.01
overpass220100%0.04
eldorado1010%0.04
poseidon110100%0.22
train110100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

601Matches
53%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
80.1ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3855%0.8914.6
Nuke2748%0.9114.6
Inferno2662%0.9415.2
Ancient2556%1.0015.9
Anubis1759%1.0817.2
Dust21346%1.1316.3
Vertigo1155%0.8115.1
Overpass989%0.8915.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.3%Spray accuracy
76.3%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
488msReaction time
20.1%T opening success
48.7%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
8.38HE damage / grenade
6.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.0846% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–9-0.0120%18 Aug
nuke16–140.0412%18 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0417%16 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0012%16 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0213%16 Aug
ancient7–13-0.077%15 Aug
cache8–13-0.027%15 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0410%15 Aug
nuke13–60.1017%15 Aug
nuke10–130.0317%15 Aug
mirage13–20.1020%15 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0616%15 Aug
inferno13–110.0114%15 Aug
vertigo11–13-0.0322%15 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0516%15 Aug
nuke13–80.0114%15 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0110%7 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0118%7 Aug
vertigo13–10-0.0420%7 Aug
mirage11–130.0111%7 Aug
inferno13–10-0.019%5 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0919%5 Aug
ancient5–13-0.056%4 Aug
inferno13–10.0926%2 Aug
ancient13–30.0617%2 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0621%2 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0129%2 Aug
anubis13–100.0512%2 Aug
anubis4–130.0024%27 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0823%27 Jul
anubis13–90.0518%26 Jul
ancient13–110.0510%26 Jul
eldorado5–90.0423%24 Jul
overpass9–50.035%24 Jul
poseidon9–00.2219%24 Jul
vertigo7–90.0215%24 Jul
cache9–13-0.0018%24 Jul
mirage13–110.0912%24 Jul
anubis7–13-0.059%24 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0627%24 Jul
nuke13–100.0217%24 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0615%23 Jul
anubis13–110.0413%23 Jul
inferno15–150.0515%23 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0013%23 Jul
inferno13–80.0513%23 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0414%22 Jul
cache16–120.0416%22 Jul
ancient13–80.0910%22 Jul
dust211–130.0317%22 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0222%20 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0216%20 Jul
dust24–13-0.0212%20 Jul
ancient16–130.0413%20 Jul
inferno5–130.0113%20 Jul
cache13–100.0711%20 Jul
ancient13–100.0027%20 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0113%18 Jul
nuke8–13-0.039%18 Jul
cache7–130.0515%18 Jul
dust210–13-0.0220%17 Jul
nuke23–250.0015%17 Jul
anubis10–130.009%17 Jul
nuke13–80.0212%13 Jul
dust26–13-0.006%13 Jul
anubis13–80.046%13 Jul
dust211–130.0111%13 Jul
inferno7–130.1122%13 Jul
inferno4–9-0.0524%13 Jul
inferno3–9-0.0214%13 Jul
dust213–50.0211%10 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0111%10 Jul
cache13–4-0.0412%10 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0122%10 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0019%10 Jul
nuke16–140.047%10 Jul
nuke13–50.0314%10 Jul
dust28–13-0.0319%9 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0311%9 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0116%9 Jul
anubis16–14-0.0213%9 Jul
train13–50.0712%7 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0113%7 Jul
inferno13–20.1219%7 Jul
anubis13–60.076%7 Jul
vertigo12–120.0114%7 Jul
cache13–40.0616%7 Jul
dust213–50.048%7 Jul
nuke13–30.0912%6 Jul
mirage13–20.0710%6 Jul
inferno13–60.039%5 Jul
ancient13–90.1517%5 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0916%5 Jul
anubis13–110.0613%5 Jul
nuke15–150.0414%3 Jul
overpass16–120.0510%3 Jul
inferno4–130.018%3 Jul
inferno13–70.0020%2 Jul
mirage13–3-0.056%6 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0320%14 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →