WanRyme — CS2 Stats

76561198162644490[U:1:202378762]

2,114Tracked matches50%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating11,961Blue band · top ~44.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#20423 of 29223 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWanRymePREMIER11,961 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning54
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50455Last 10050%Win rateLWWWLLLTWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.8
Aggression7.6
Utility4.2
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 646ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning5.4
Utility4.2
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time641ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 652ms → last ⅓ avg 641ms
Headshot accuracy20.2%+7.5%
first ⅓ avg 12.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — cache 13–2
131Biggest win — cache
6Longest win streak
101In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 69% over 13mirageWeakest map · 32% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2012860%0.02
mirageD1961332%0.01
ancientB137654%0.02
anubisB136746%0.01
nukeC135838%0.03
cacheS139469%0.02
infernoA85363%0.06
italy1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

7Matches
29%Win rate
0.84Avg K/D
84.0ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Overpass1100%0.9622.0
Mirage10%1.0017.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy
37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.3%Spray accuracy
82.9%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
646msReaction time
27.9%T opening success
58.6%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
11.06HE damage / grenade
5.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.9016% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–13-0.0530%29 Aug
mirage13–70.0725%28 Aug
ancient13–110.0819%28 Aug
anubis13–70.0432%28 Aug
dust29–130.1216%28 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0323%28 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0224%28 Aug
mirage15–150.0521%28 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0230%28 Aug
dust215–150.0130%28 Aug
dust213–60.0720%27 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0021%27 Aug
nuke15–150.017%27 Aug
nuke9–130.0322%27 Aug
inferno5–130.0112%26 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0210%23 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0919%22 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0124%22 Aug
dust213–40.0517%22 Aug
inferno16–140.0016%22 Aug
inferno13–60.1422%22 Aug
inferno15–150.0719%22 Aug
anubis13–40.0932%22 Aug
nuke10–130.0523%22 Aug
dust27–130.0214%22 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0538%22 Aug
dust213–80.0119%22 Aug
dust29–13-0.039%22 Aug
cache13–30.0025%22 Aug
inferno13–100.0317%20 Aug
mirage13–80.044%20 Aug
nuke13–60.0316%20 Aug
dust210–90.018%19 Aug
inferno13–100.1519%19 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0217%18 Aug
nuke13–100.0924%18 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0513%18 Aug
mirage13–160.0413%18 Aug
nuke10–130.048%17 Aug
ancient13–90.0111%15 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0328%15 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0514%15 Aug
cache1–13-0.0321%15 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0119%15 Aug
ancient13–11-0.049%13 Aug
mirage13–50.058%13 Aug
inferno13–60.0911%13 Aug
ancient13–70.073%13 Aug
cache13–40.0515%13 Aug
mirage10–130.0113%12 Aug
anubis9–130.0118%12 Aug
dust24–13-0.104%12 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0514%12 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0715%12 Aug
cache13–30.0313%11 Aug
cache7–13-0.0120%11 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0112%11 Aug
mirage10–130.0514%9 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0618%8 Aug
nuke13–100.1010%8 Aug
anubis7–130.0011%8 Aug
cache13–10.0114%8 Aug
dust25–130.0113%8 Aug
mirage13–50.0410%8 Aug
dust210–130.0015%8 Aug
cache13–40.0721%8 Aug
ancient13–80.018%8 Aug
mirage13–110.1114%7 Aug
cache8–13-0.0124%7 Aug
nuke13–70.0614%7 Aug
dust213–9-0.049%7 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0215%6 Aug
mirage8–13-0.037%6 Aug
ancient16–140.0714%6 Aug
ancient9–130.0413%5 Aug
dust213–80.0719%5 Aug
anubis13–100.1110%5 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0415%5 Aug
cache13–20.1616%5 Aug
dust213–110.0111%3 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0224%1 Aug
cache16–120.0125%1 Aug
cache13–9-0.008%1 Aug
anubis10–130.0911%1 Aug
anubis7–130.048%31 Jul
dust213–60.039%31 Jul
dust213–9-0.0210%31 Jul
cache16–14-0.0015%30 Jul
ancient8–13-0.009%29 Jul
mirage7–130.0312%29 Jul
anubis16–14-0.0212%29 Jul
dust213–40.0817%27 Jul
italy5–13-0.0114%26 Jul
dust213–10-0.038%26 Jul
mirage0–13-0.055%26 Jul
mirage13–70.036%26 Jul
dust213–100.0910%23 Jul
ancient11–130.138%23 Jul
cache10–130.028%23 Jul
nuke9–130.0117%22 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →