bellX — CS2 Stats

76561198162478252[U:1:202212524]✓ No bans

3,581Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 Developing
Premier CS Rating13,025Blue band · top ~38.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6011 of 8632 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbellXPREMIER13,025 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning61
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45496Last 10045%Win rateWWLWTLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.9
Aggression7.6
Utility4.8
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 638ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning6.1
Utility4.8
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time655ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 681ms → last ⅓ avg 655ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%+3.1%
first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — anubis 13–0
130Biggest win — anubis
4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
64In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 57% over 7anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B189950%0.01
vertigoA169756%0.01
cacheB157847%0.02
infernoD134931%0.00
anubisD103730%0.01
ancientC83538%0.04
nukeC73443%0.01
mirageA74357%0.03
train42250%-0.01
office21150%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.5%Headshot accuracy
37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.1%Spray accuracy
80.1%Counter-strafing
12.1°Preaim
638msReaction time
30.7%T opening success
64.4%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
13.2%Flash assists
11.18HE damage / grenade
4.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.0627° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.4732% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–20.0817%27 Aug
nuke13–20.0331%27 Aug
vertigo7–13-0.0418%10 Aug
cache13–70.0814%10 Aug
train12–12-0.0520%9 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0213%8 Aug
cache10–130.0613%7 Aug
inferno13–20.0717%7 Aug
dust210–13-0.0414%7 Aug
vertigo13–60.0311%7 Aug
train1–10-0.0520%7 Aug
vertigo13–80.039%7 Aug
cache0–3-0.05100%7 Aug
ancient14–160.036%7 Aug
vertigo3–13-0.0415%7 Aug
vertigo13–7-0.017%7 Aug
cache13–50.0215%6 Aug
vertigo13–40.0313%6 Aug
train13–90.0418%6 Aug
dust23–13-0.056%6 Aug
ancient14–160.1011%6 Aug
dust213–110.0721%6 Aug
vertigo8–130.0515%6 Aug
vertigo13–50.1021%5 Aug
dust25–13-0.0314%5 Aug
ancient0–12-0.0221%5 Aug
mirage1–11-0.0116%5 Aug
cache13–80.069%5 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0410%4 Aug
vertigo13–40.065%4 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0215%4 Aug
vertigo13–110.0116%4 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0319%4 Aug
cache13–50.1221%4 Aug
train13–20.0114%4 Aug
anubis13–110.0517%4 Aug
cache1–13-0.0215%4 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0017%3 Aug
ancient13–80.087%3 Aug
dust20–13-0.030%3 Aug
cache10–130.0316%3 Aug
ancient11–130.0312%3 Aug
dust29–13-0.058%3 Aug
cache13–110.0115%3 Aug
dust212–12-0.0415%3 Aug
nuke12–120.0419%2 Aug
vertigo13–60.0611%2 Aug
anubis1–130.0120%2 Aug
inferno10–130.0114%2 Aug
dust213–100.0321%2 Aug
cache9–130.0121%1 Aug
mirage16–130.0113%1 Aug
dust213–20.1224%1 Aug
mirage13–80.0724%1 Aug
ancient4–130.0311%1 Aug
vertigo3–13-0.0411%1 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0138%1 Aug
inferno15–150.0122%31 Jul
dust23–13-0.0615%31 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0321%31 Jul
cache2–13-0.0713%31 Jul
dust213–80.0823%31 Jul
dust215–150.048%31 Jul
inferno11–130.029%31 Jul
cache7–130.046%31 Jul
cache13–9-0.049%31 Jul
vertigo9–13-0.0214%31 Jul
dust25–13-0.0413%31 Jul
dust213–80.0219%30 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0115%30 Jul
anubis10–130.0710%30 Jul
office9–6-0.0617%30 Jul
nuke13–70.059%30 Jul
dust213–40.0718%30 Jul
mirage13–100.078%30 Jul
cache9–12-0.0111%30 Jul
vertigo13–30.0711%30 Jul
inferno13–90.0213%29 Jul
vertigo8–13-0.0227%29 Jul
inferno13–6-0.093%29 Jul
ancient13–110.0919%29 Jul
office10–130.0512%29 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0015%29 Jul
anubis13–00.1515%28 Jul
mirage16–130.0413%27 Jul
inferno12–12-0.0020%26 Jul
anubis2–13-0.1011%25 Jul
mirage3–130.0317%25 Jul
inferno13–110.0318%25 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0123%23 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0218%23 Jul
cache13–80.0215%23 Jul
nuke13–50.0215%23 Jul
vertigo4–13-0.0413%23 Jul
dust213–80.0023%23 Jul
dust28–10.0713%23 Jul
anubis10–130.029%23 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0315%22 Jul
anubis4–13-0.060%22 Jul
anubis8–130.029%22 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →