ARN — CS2 Stats

76561198161975477[U:1:201709749]

1,067Tracked matches61%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,765Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4443 of 29731 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGARNFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER24,765 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning46
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT52399Last 10052%Win rateLWWWLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.06 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.0
Aggression6.4
Utility4.8
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch5.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 43 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning4.6
Utility4.8
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact8.6

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time522ms−10ms
first ⅓ avg 533ms → last ⅓ avg 522ms
Headshot accuracy30.5%+4.9%
first ⅓ avg 25.6% → last ⅓ avg 30.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.37Best rating — inferno 4–0
132Biggest win — ancient
7Longest win streak
58In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 78% over 9mirageWeakest map · 21% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C1981142%0.02
infernoS1713476%0.09
ancientA1710759%0.07
mirageD1431121%0.01
cacheB126650%0.03
nukeS97278%0.03
vertigo41325%0.14
anubis42250%0.04
debris220100%0.15
train1010%0.02
poseidon1010%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

251Matches
51%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
92.0ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
34%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1656%1.1317.3
Dust21457%1.3319.6
Anubis1155%1.3821.4
Inferno933%1.0515.8
Ancient956%1.2417.0
Nuke956%1.4320.9
Train333%1.5216.7
Cache333%1.2820.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.3%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.8%Spray accuracy
83.6%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
520msReaction time
32.3%T opening success
53.4%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
8.98HE damage / grenade
5.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.3227% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–13-0.0336%25 Aug
inferno13–50.0528%25 Aug
dust213–5-0.0033%25 Aug
nuke13–100.0523%13 Aug
dust28–130.0236%8 Aug
dust213–6-0.0235%8 Aug
cache13–50.0126%8 Aug
dust213–110.0129%8 Aug
ancient13–110.0232%8 Aug
dust211–13-0.0425%8 Aug
dust29–130.1038%8 Aug
mirage13–80.0331%8 Aug
mirage11–130.0730%8 Aug
ancient13–90.0725%8 Aug
cache13–90.0134%7 Aug
mirage15–150.0325%7 Aug
cache13–60.0658%7 Aug
cache13–100.0418%7 Aug
vertigo9–30.3131%7 Aug
vertigo4–9-0.0325%7 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0528%4 Aug
ancient13–70.1728%4 Aug
train12–120.0239%4 Aug
dust23–130.1530%4 Aug
inferno9–70.0769%4 Aug
dust213–100.0225%3 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0235%3 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0424%3 Aug
dust26–13-0.0128%3 Aug
inferno16–140.0521%2 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0319%2 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0319%2 Aug
ancient13–60.0324%2 Aug
ancient13–30.1124%2 Aug
nuke13–30.0725%2 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0221%1 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0327%1 Aug
cache13–80.1131%1 Aug
anubis13–100.0640%1 Aug
nuke15–150.0634%1 Aug
inferno13–80.0628%1 Aug
ancient13–20.1336%1 Aug
mirage8–130.0345%1 Aug
anubis8–00.1460%1 Aug
inferno4–00.3732%1 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0224%1 Aug
vertigo7–90.1917%31 Jul
poseidon5–90.0423%31 Jul
ancient5–130.0735%30 Jul
cache10–130.0227%29 Jul
nuke13–40.0635%29 Jul
dust28–130.0524%29 Jul
vertigo8–80.0717%29 Jul
debris9–20.1836%29 Jul
ancient12–120.0826%29 Jul
debris9–60.1236%29 Jul
inferno9–40.0732%29 Jul
mirage15–150.0324%29 Jul
nuke13–90.1232%29 Jul
mirage8–130.0221%29 Jul
mirage2–13-0.029%29 Jul
inferno9–50.2117%28 Jul
inferno9–30.3530%28 Jul
nuke1–9-0.2420%28 Jul
inferno9–60.0314%28 Jul
cache15–150.0519%28 Jul
mirage10–130.0530%28 Jul
dust211–13-0.0125%28 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0321%28 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0621%28 Jul
ancient13–100.1425%27 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0222%27 Jul
anubis12–12-0.0018%27 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0319%27 Jul
dust29–13-0.0416%27 Jul
dust213–40.0834%27 Jul
cache3–130.0215%27 Jul
ancient7–130.1829%27 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0327%27 Jul
mirage13–50.0725%26 Jul
ancient13–100.0416%26 Jul
ancient13–30.1127%26 Jul
dust210–13-0.0423%26 Jul
dust213–100.0140%26 Jul
cache11–13-0.0128%26 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0129%26 Jul
dust213–50.0218%26 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0216%26 Jul
dust213–60.0137%26 Jul
cache11–130.0025%23 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0324%23 Jul
dust23–100.0639%23 Jul
cache10–13-0.0721%23 Jul
nuke13–40.0930%23 Jul
cache13–40.0533%23 Jul
inferno13–40.0942%23 Jul
ancient13–70.0629%23 Jul
inferno9–20.2316%23 Jul
inferno9–50.1429%23 Jul
nuke13–70.0826%22 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →