starFox

starFox — CS2 Stats

DE76561198161668209[U:1:201402481]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,682Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating16,606Purple band · top ~22% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14095 of 24277 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,942 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGstarFoxFACEITLevel 9 · 1,942 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER16,606 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning42
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46513Last 10046%Win rateLLWWLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.5
Aggression5.3
Utility6.0
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning4.2
Utility6.0
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time556ms−46ms
first ⅓ avg 602ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 19.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — inferno 13–6
132Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 60% over 5nukeWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA23131057%0.01
mirageB157847%0.00
anubisB158753%-0.00
infernoC145936%0.03
nukeD134931%0.01
dust2C114736%0.00
ancientA53260%-0.03
overpass42250%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,353Matches
51%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
76.8ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage14143%1.0115.3
Dust211345%1.0715.1
Ancient9547%1.0114.3
Inferno9050%1.1516.0
Anubis5551%1.0114.4
Nuke4349%1.1117.2
Overpass3571%1.0916.8
Cache1080%1.0617.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.1%Headshot accuracy
33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.5%Spray accuracy
83.7%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
552msReaction time
32.6%T opening success
34.2%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
9.2%Flash assists
9.41HE damage / grenade
10.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.618% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke17–19-0.0026%22 Aug
nuke8–130.0017%18 Aug
dust213–20.1021%18 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0415%18 Aug
dust28–13-0.0218%13 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0118%13 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0114%12 Aug
dust213–80.0430%12 Aug
mirage3–130.0329%11 Aug
dust29–13-0.0727%11 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0517%7 Aug
cache13–4-0.0425%7 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0523%31 Jul
anubis13–20.1018%29 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0210%29 Jul
mirage9–130.017%29 Jul
cache13–60.0525%29 Jul
mirage13–30.0826%29 Jul
mirage1–6-0.040%29 Jul
inferno10–130.0115%28 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0817%28 Jul
anubis13–90.0722%27 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0120%27 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0126%27 Jul
nuke13–160.0229%27 Jul
cache13–11-0.0517%27 Jul
dust210–13-0.0225%27 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0813%27 Jul
dust26–13-0.0318%26 Jul
anubis13–90.0719%26 Jul
cache16–140.0223%22 Jul
inferno11–130.0022%20 Jul
dust212–160.0133%20 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0616%20 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0210%11 Jul
mirage13–30.0414%11 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0213%8 Jul
nuke13–80.0619%8 Jul
nuke9–50.078%8 Jul
cache13–50.0414%7 Jul
inferno2–9-0.0914%7 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0121%6 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0320%6 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0311%5 Jul
overpass8–13-0.0118%5 Jul
nuke14–160.0117%5 Jul
cache12–120.0326%4 Jul
cache13–8-0.0125%3 Jul
cache1–13-0.0729%3 Jul
cache13–110.0513%2 Jul
cache13–100.0331%2 Jul
anubis13–100.0412%1 Jul
cache13–20.1222%1 Jul
anubis13–3-0.018%1 Jul
dust29–13-0.0219%1 Jul
dust213–50.0619%30 Jun
ancient8–130.0610%26 Jun
cache13–70.019%25 Jun
inferno8–8-0.0421%25 Jun
overpass9–50.0320%25 Jun
anubis14–16-0.0320%22 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0219%22 Jun
inferno13–110.0521%22 Jun
inferno13–160.0717%18 Jun
nuke13–16-0.0113%18 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0113%18 Jun
dust213–10-0.0023%17 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0418%17 Jun
cache13–9-0.0223%17 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0417%17 Jun
cache13–20.0115%17 Jun
dust28–13-0.0424%16 Jun
inferno8–130.0217%16 Jun
overpass13–90.0317%15 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0817%15 Jun
mirage13–60.0615%7 Jun
nuke2–130.0231%7 Jun
anubis9–13-0.069%31 May
mirage4–13-0.0622%28 May
cache5–13-0.056%28 May
cache5–130.0446%28 May
cache5–13-0.0526%28 May
cache5–13-0.0617%27 May
cache12–120.0422%27 May
overpass8–13-0.0520%27 May
cache5–130.0424%27 May
inferno16–120.0621%27 May
nuke13–100.0919%26 May
inferno13–60.0519%26 May
nuke13–40.0318%26 May
anubis11–13-0.0322%25 May
mirage10–130.0518%25 May
cache13–70.0617%25 May
anubis10–130.0022%25 May
mirage13–110.0918%25 May
inferno7–00.1115%25 May
nuke11–13-0.0115%24 May
inferno13–60.1818%21 May
cache4–13-0.0620%21 May
cache8–13-0.0015%21 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →