Skeeter McSplooge — CS2 Stats

76561198161382545[U:1:201116817]✓ No bans

937Tracked matches53%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating14,265Blue band · top ~32.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6505 of 9649 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSkeeter McSploogePREMIER14,265 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning47
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46495Last 10046%Win rateLLWWWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.2
Aggression4.6
Utility4.7
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch1.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 645ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning4.7
Utility4.7
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time638ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 664ms → last ⅓ avg 638ms
Headshot accuracy19.5%+5.0%
first ⅓ avg 14.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — nuke 13–4
130Biggest win — anubis
4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
612In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 70% over 10ancientWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB21101148%-0.01
mirageC1881044%-0.01
nukeC1761135%-0.00
cacheC125742%0.00
dust2A116555%0.00
anubisS107370%0.01
ancientD51420%-0.05
overpassA53260%0.02
vertigo1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

9Matches
44%Win rate
0.77Avg K/D
56.5ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage333%0.7411.7
Dust2250%0.6812.0
Inferno250%0.7412.5
Anubis10%0.578.0
Ancient1100%1.3316.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.3%Spray accuracy
84.2%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
645msReaction time
21.3%T opening success
49.4%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
12.18HE damage / grenade
7.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4106 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.2983% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke11–130.0119%26 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0819%26 Aug
dust213–110.0312%26 Aug
inferno13–90.0111%25 Aug
nuke13–110.0118%25 Aug
anubis13–5-0.0116%24 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0423%20 Aug
cache5–13-0.0211%20 Aug
cache9–13-0.0220%15 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0133%13 Aug
dust213–60.0710%13 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0119%13 Aug
nuke13–40.0919%13 Aug
nuke11–130.0116%4 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0216%4 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0116%3 Aug
mirage13–100.0126%3 Aug
inferno13–7-0.067%29 Jul
nuke13–1-0.03100%29 Jul
cache13–10-0.029%29 Jul
nuke7–130.0718%27 Jul
cache10–13-0.0315%27 Jul
cache13–5-0.0217%27 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0224%26 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0412%26 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0423%26 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0422%26 Jul
cache11–130.0122%23 Jul
nuke11–130.0021%21 Jul
inferno9–13-0.007%21 Jul
cache15–150.0517%17 Jul
anubis13–50.0715%17 Jul
mirage15–150.0215%17 Jul
inferno5–11-0.1020%16 Jul
anubis13–0-0.0118%16 Jul
inferno13–30.0312%16 Jul
inferno13–70.0216%13 Jul
anubis13–90.0513%13 Jul
mirage10–13-0.088%12 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0523%11 Jul
cache13–110.0215%11 Jul
inferno12–12-0.0215%8 Jul
cache13–6-0.0313%8 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0024%8 Jul
overpass10–130.0717%24 Jun
mirage10–130.0521%23 Jun
dust213–70.069%23 Jun
mirage7–2-0.0213%23 Jun
dust210–13-0.0113%23 Jun
anubis8–13-0.058%23 Jun
mirage11–130.0415%23 Jun
inferno13–60.0417%22 Jun
dust21–13-0.0111%22 Jun
nuke2–13-0.0813%22 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0210%21 Jun
overpass7–13-0.0120%21 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0118%21 Jun
mirage13–100.0621%13 Jun
anubis11–13-0.017%13 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0816%13 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0911%13 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0312%11 Jun
dust213–90.029%11 Jun
dust211–13-0.038%11 Jun
anubis13–110.0416%10 Jun
nuke13–80.0215%9 Jun
nuke6–130.0315%9 Jun
dust213–90.0322%9 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0312%7 Jun
nuke16–140.0216%7 Jun
overpass13–30.027%7 Jun
overpass13–70.0124%7 Jun
inferno5–130.0324%7 Jun
nuke14–16-0.0416%6 Jun
cache12–120.0414%4 Jun
cache13–60.0721%4 Jun
dust213–7-0.0415%1 Jun
inferno16–130.0111%1 Jun
anubis13–60.0823%1 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0314%1 Jun
mirage10–13-0.059%30 May
overpass13–100.0310%30 May
anubis8–130.0011%29 May
ancient8–13-0.0610%29 May
dust26–13-0.0617%29 May
inferno14–160.0214%28 May
inferno13–9-0.018%27 May
inferno13–3-0.098%26 May
inferno10–130.0116%26 May
mirage13–60.0215%24 May
ancient10–13-0.0719%24 May
nuke6–13-0.033%24 May
dust212–16-0.0317%23 May
inferno13–10.0912%23 May
mirage1–13-0.0613%23 May
cache8–13-0.0018%23 May
vertigo11–13-0.0313%23 May
mirage13–10-0.0416%14 May
inferno4–100.0619%14 May
nuke13–50.0513%14 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →