HuseinsBTK

HuseinsBTK — CS2 Stats

LV76561198161286428[U:1:201020700]Steam profile ↗

978Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.7 Learning
Premier CS Rating15,510Purple band · top ~26.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#16647 of 27192 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHuseinsBTKPREMIER15,510 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim30
Positioning35
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43498Last 10043%Win rateLWTWLWLLTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.0
Aggression2.8
Utility5.9
Positioning3.5
Opening Duels0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 36% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 728ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.0
Positioning3.5
Utility5.9
Mechanics3.1
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact6.3

Composite 3.7/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time718ms+21ms
first ⅓ avg 697ms → last ⅓ avg 718ms
Headshot accuracy13.1%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 13.4% → last ⅓ avg 13.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — cache 13–8
133Biggest win — cache
3Longest win streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 100% over 5anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B31141745%-0.01
infernoC1981142%-0.03
nukeC1771041%-0.04
cacheB147750%0.01
anubisD71614%-0.05
ancientS550100%-0.02
overpassD51420%-0.06
mirage2020%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.9%Headshot accuracy
31.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.6%Spray accuracy
63.9%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
728msReaction time
20.2%T opening success
36.1%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
1.9%Flash assists
16.65HE damage / grenade
6.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.9018% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 728.2437ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.2214% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–13-0.037%6 May
inferno13–8-0.0117%6 May
dust215–15-0.0511%6 May
inferno13–60.0311%6 May
cache5–130.0217%4 May
cache13–30.0215%4 May
dust25–13-0.0327%4 May
cache4–130.0225%3 May
cache12–12-0.0513%3 May
cache13–40.0026%3 May
cache12–120.0318%3 May
cache13–5-0.0215%3 May
cache13–80.0110%3 May
dust211–130.0115%3 May
dust210–13-0.0012%3 May
cache3–13-0.0314%29 Apr
cache13–70.0716%29 Apr
cache13–80.128%29 Apr
cache13–8-0.0012%29 Apr
cache9–13-0.0313%29 Apr
cache8–13-0.0212%29 Apr
inferno9–13-0.043%28 Apr
dust213–70.109%28 Apr
ancient13–4-0.114%28 Apr
dust215–15-0.022%28 Apr
dust210–130.0414%28 Apr
nuke13–10-0.048%28 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0311%28 Apr
dust213–11-0.0814%27 Apr
dust27–13-0.0221%27 Apr
nuke13–90.0315%27 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0414%27 Apr
anubis9–13-0.055%27 Apr
inferno13–7-0.038%27 Apr
ancient13–70.037%26 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0721%26 Apr
dust210–13-0.0112%26 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0317%26 Apr
nuke13–3-0.0113%26 Apr
dust213–110.0215%25 Apr
dust213–10-0.0116%25 Apr
nuke13–16-0.0310%25 Apr
dust216–13-0.0316%25 Apr
inferno2–13-0.0633%24 Apr
nuke15–15-0.019%24 Apr
anubis15–15-0.018%24 Apr
nuke2–13-0.1011%24 Apr
overpass6–13-0.129%23 Apr
inferno13–11-0.073%23 Apr
anubis7–13-0.078%23 Apr
inferno12–120.0216%21 Apr
dust211–13-0.080%21 Apr
dust213–50.086%21 Apr
dust27–13-0.0310%20 Apr
nuke13–7-0.038%20 Apr
overpass13–11-0.0211%20 Apr
dust212–16-0.027%20 Apr
overpass6–13-0.109%20 Apr
anubis6–13-0.063%17 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0315%17 Apr
overpass5–13-0.0010%17 Apr
anubis6–12-0.0915%17 Apr
dust215–150.0113%16 Apr
ancient13–7-0.006%16 Apr
inferno9–13-0.017%16 Apr
nuke8–130.0014%15 Apr
anubis13–11-0.0312%15 Apr
inferno13–7-0.0321%15 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0216%15 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0321%14 Apr
nuke4–13-0.100%14 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0311%14 Apr
nuke11–13-0.0712%14 Apr
inferno13–9-0.027%14 Apr
inferno13–8-0.068%14 Apr
dust210–13-0.039%13 Apr
dust213–9-0.0235%12 Apr
dust213–110.017%12 Apr
dust25–13-0.0329%12 Apr
nuke13–10-0.093%12 Apr
dust213–60.0615%12 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0814%12 Apr
anubis3–13-0.019%12 Apr
dust211–130.0116%12 Apr
dust213–50.019%12 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0511%12 Apr
dust28–13-0.0438%12 Apr
dust213–80.0231%12 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0619%11 Apr
ancient13–3-0.008%11 Apr
dust213–10-0.028%11 Apr
inferno13–90.0311%11 Apr
nuke3–13-0.130%11 Apr
overpass5–13-0.045%11 Apr
dust213–80.0114%11 Apr
dust213–11-0.0110%10 Apr
mirage7–130.0518%10 Apr
inferno6–13-0.055%9 Apr
nuke4–13-0.069%9 Apr
nuke13–110.0012%8 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →