Swanex — CS2 Stats

76561198160865743[U:1:200600015]

569Tracked matches67%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating13,818Blue band · top ~34.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4564 of 6686 tracked
FaceitLevel 3 · 777 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

13,818Peak Premier on CSDB
777Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 777
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 124 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 13,818
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1,182 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSwanexFACEITLevel 3 · 777 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER13,818 · Blue bandPEAK ELO777csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning47
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52462Last 10052%Win rateWLWWLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.1
Aggression4.1
Utility4.7
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch1.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 650ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning4.7
Utility4.7
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time652ms−60ms
first ⅓ avg 712ms → last ⅓ avg 652ms
Headshot accuracy13.2%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 11.9% → last ⅓ avg 13.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — nuke 13–2
132Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
310In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 30infernoWeakest map · 38% over 24
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S30201067%0.00
infernoC2491538%-0.01
mirageB137654%0.01
anubisC125742%-0.02
nukeA95456%0.00
ancientB63350%0.00
cacheB63350%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

43Matches
49%Win rate
0.70Avg K/D
62.1ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

26%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21753%0.7310.5
Inferno1145%0.7110.7
Mirage729%0.6510.4
Ancient475%0.5710.5
Nuke20%0.538.5
Train1100%1.148.0
Anubis1100%1.0715.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.2%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
78.4%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
650msReaction time
22.4%T opening success
41.7%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
8.78HE damage / grenade
6.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.2214% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.3557% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno16–14-0.0610%27 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0221%26 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0411%26 Aug
dust213–60.0716%26 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0013%26 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0323%26 Aug
dust213–6-0.049%26 Aug
anubis5–13-0.079%26 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0416%25 Aug
nuke16–12-0.035%25 Aug
dust213–50.0711%25 Aug
cache13–8-0.0511%25 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0416%25 Aug
dust213–7-0.0123%13 Aug
nuke8–130.0224%13 Aug
mirage3–13-0.034%13 Aug
anubis16–130.0515%12 Aug
dust213–100.0119%11 Aug
dust216–130.0613%11 Aug
mirage13–100.0816%11 Aug
ancient13–100.029%11 Aug
mirage10–130.0114%10 Aug
ancient14–16-0.013%10 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0115%10 Aug
dust213–80.098%10 Aug
anubis13–100.056%10 Aug
dust213–80.0115%9 Aug
dust212–16-0.0823%9 Aug
mirage13–90.0811%9 Aug
mirage13–40.0411%9 Aug
dust211–130.0218%9 Aug
mirage14–160.059%9 Aug
dust210–13-0.0212%9 Aug
dust213–100.0116%9 Aug
inferno13–80.0922%9 Aug
dust27–13-0.0411%8 Aug
mirage5–13-0.038%8 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0116%8 Aug
dust213–100.0113%8 Aug
inferno14–160.006%8 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0214%8 Aug
dust213–20.0620%8 Aug
ancient13–60.048%7 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0714%7 Aug
dust211–13-0.0410%7 Aug
cache8–13-0.0513%7 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0222%7 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0614%7 Aug
anubis13–80.0619%6 Aug
cache5–13-0.056%6 Aug
inferno13–80.0016%6 Aug
inferno13–90.0112%6 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0210%5 Aug
cache9–13-0.038%5 Aug
ancient13–60.025%5 Aug
nuke13–20.1413%5 Aug
dust213–11-0.0422%5 Aug
inferno8–80.0210%5 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0110%4 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0510%4 Aug
dust213–10-0.0316%4 Aug
inferno10–130.0413%3 Aug
dust213–60.0512%3 Aug
dust28–13-0.0214%3 Aug
dust216–13-0.0213%2 Aug
dust213–70.1110%2 Aug
dust213–9-0.0318%2 Aug
mirage13–80.0514%2 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0015%2 Aug
inferno15–150.0314%2 Aug
dust27–13-0.0310%2 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0112%2 Aug
mirage8–130.009%2 Aug
dust213–50.0822%1 Aug
dust211–13-0.028%1 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0116%1 Aug
mirage6–13-0.075%1 Aug
dust211–13-0.0414%1 Aug
inferno13–100.0310%1 Aug
inferno10–13-0.077%1 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0412%1 Aug
nuke13–30.0417%1 Aug
mirage13–80.0212%1 Aug
dust213–50.0012%1 Aug
inferno7–13-0.048%1 Aug
dust213–8-0.0216%1 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0417%31 Jul
cache13–4-0.0513%31 Jul
ancient6–13-0.065%31 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0611%31 Jul
inferno9–13-0.063%31 Jul
nuke6–13-0.045%31 Jul
inferno13–20.0510%31 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0514%31 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0515%30 Jul
inferno9–130.0316%30 Jul
cache13–40.0011%30 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0211%29 Jul
anubis9–13-0.099%29 Jul
dust22–13-0.0721%29 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →