ESKAq — CS2 Stats

76561198158287440[U:1:198021712]

161Tracked matches57%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
CSDB Leaderboard#51452 of 53109 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,269 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,269 +0 28 Aug30 Aug · 2 observations
1,2691,269peak 1,26928 Aug30 Aug
1,269Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
2Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,269
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 82 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGESKAqFACEITLevel 7 · 1,269 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,269csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning45
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54451Last 10054%Win rateWWLWWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.1
Aggression4.7
Utility6.3
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels0.1
Clutch5.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning4.5
Utility6.3
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time572ms−85ms
first ⅓ avg 658ms → last ⅓ avg 572ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%−5.1%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — inferno 13–1
131Biggest win — inferno
7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
1310In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 12mirageWeakest map · 43% over 30
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC30131743%0.01
dust2A2011955%-0.00
infernoB147750%0.02
ancientA138562%0.00
nukeS129375%0.03
cacheA53260%-0.01
overpass42250%0.04
anubis1010%-0.03
train110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 30). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

232Matches
57%Win rate
1.28Avg K/D
85.2ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3644%1.0516.2
Dust22352%1.0315.7
Ancient1560%1.0718.3
Nuke1377%1.3619.1
Inferno1362%1.2118.2
Cache757%1.3119.4
Overpass540%1.1418.8
Anubis333%1.6515.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
77.7%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
576msReaction time
21.5%T opening success
39.5%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
9.24HE damage / grenade
14.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.5125% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 30 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–60.0222%27 Aug
inferno13–40.0213%26 Aug
cache6–13-0.0911%26 Aug
dust213–60.0424%25 Aug
mirage13–80.0210%25 Aug
mirage11–130.0610%24 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0016%24 Aug
ancient13–90.0316%22 Aug
cache11–13-0.0216%22 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0430%22 Aug
nuke13–80.0517%21 Aug
mirage13–80.0714%21 Aug
mirage13–50.0516%21 Aug
dust21–10-0.009%21 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0312%21 Aug
dust29–130.0126%21 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0123%20 Aug
dust213–30.0718%20 Aug
dust213–110.0524%20 Aug
ancient13–100.0415%20 Aug
dust26–13-0.0310%20 Aug
inferno6–130.0724%20 Aug
nuke13–110.0421%19 Aug
dust216–140.0214%19 Aug
inferno7–13-0.065%19 Aug
dust29–13-0.0029%19 Aug
ancient13–90.0212%18 Aug
cache13–80.0424%18 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0310%18 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0328%18 Aug
mirage13–90.0521%18 Aug
nuke10–130.0116%18 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0216%17 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0312%17 Aug
mirage13–110.0224%17 Aug
inferno19–150.0612%17 Aug
mirage13–40.0311%17 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0118%17 Aug
nuke13–60.0523%17 Aug
mirage11–130.0428%16 Aug
dust27–13-0.0718%16 Aug
mirage3–130.0121%16 Aug
nuke13–100.1025%16 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0317%16 Aug
cache13–110.0430%16 Aug
dust25–130.0424%14 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0417%14 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0017%14 Aug
dust213–160.0225%13 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0312%13 Aug
cache13–7-0.0112%13 Aug
mirage13–70.0522%12 Aug
ancient0–13-0.0532%12 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0021%12 Aug
inferno13–10.1321%19 May
mirage11–13-0.0519%10 Dec
ancient13–10-0.0120%3 Dec
inferno13–10-0.0014%3 Dec
nuke11–130.0030%2 Dec
dust213–16-0.0126%2 Dec
mirage5–13-0.0724%2 Dec
mirage8–13-0.0415%2 Dec
nuke13–70.0322%1 Dec
mirage5–13-0.0135%1 Dec
dust213–7-0.0222%1 Dec
dust216–140.0118%1 Dec
mirage10–130.0421%1 Dec
inferno13–100.0416%30 Nov
overpass13–80.0752%30 Nov
mirage13–160.0114%28 Nov
inferno11–130.0025%28 Nov
mirage13–50.0526%28 Nov
mirage16–140.0227%28 Nov
nuke5–13-0.0416%28 Nov
ancient9–130.0316%27 Nov
dust213–5-0.0029%27 Nov
dust216–13-0.0124%27 Nov
mirage11–13-0.0425%27 Nov
nuke7–30.0111%27 Nov
dust213–60.0118%27 Nov
overpass5–130.0112%27 Nov
inferno6–13-0.0112%27 Nov
dust26–13-0.0719%27 Nov
inferno8–80.0410%26 Nov
ancient13–11-0.0024%26 Nov
nuke13–60.0720%26 Nov
dust213–2-0.0225%26 Nov
mirage5–130.0214%26 Nov
overpass15–190.0130%26 Nov
ancient19–17-0.0117%25 Nov
mirage14–160.0530%25 Nov
overpass13–100.0526%25 Nov
dust213–11-0.0429%25 Nov
train13–50.0429%24 Nov
mirage13–80.0225%24 Nov
mirage13–11-0.0329%24 Nov
inferno13–40.0129%24 Nov
ancient13–50.0616%24 Nov
ancient13–16-0.0121%24 Nov
nuke22–200.0125%21 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →