lil bro

lil bro — CS2 Stats

76561198156225576[U:1:195959848]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,749Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating10,868Blue band · top ~50.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#13151 of 18167 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,120 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlil broFACEITLevel 9 · 2,120 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER10,868 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning56
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5050Last 10050%Win rateWWLLWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.1
Aggression6.7
Utility5.0
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 61% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning5.6
Utility5.0
Mechanics2.4
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact6.1

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time571ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 586ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 21.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — anubis 13–6
132Biggest win — cache
3Longest win streak
W2Current streak
155In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 63% over 19nukeWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB34171750%0.01
anubisA1912763%0.02
infernoA1710759%-0.01
nukeD102820%0.00
dust2D51420%-0.02
vertigo43175%0.03
cache42250%-0.03
overpass31233%0.03
ancient32167%-0.02
train1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,815Matches
50%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
82.0ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage70751%1.1016.4
Anubis21043%1.0616.2
Inferno19549%1.1215.6
Ancient18646%0.9715.2
Nuke17157%1.2016.2
Dust214739%1.0214.5
Overpass5768%1.2016.6
Vertigo4747%1.1616.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
31.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.1%Spray accuracy
60.9%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
564msReaction time
28.6%T opening success
56.8%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
7.35HE damage / grenade
8.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.5706% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo13–50.0830%26 Aug
inferno16–130.0115%26 Aug
train5–13-0.0216%26 Aug
overpass13–160.0121%19 Aug
vertigo13–9-0.0323%18 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0419%18 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0114%18 Aug
cache13–20.0122%17 Aug
anubis0–11-0.0820%16 Aug
dust213–90.0219%10 Aug
mirage19–160.0214%9 Aug
mirage13–100.0227%9 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0027%7 Aug
ancient13–2-0.0312%6 Aug
inferno11–130.0214%4 Aug
mirage13–110.0120%4 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0230%3 Aug
mirage13–100.0622%3 Aug
anubis13–160.0917%2 Aug
anubis13–50.0615%31 Jul
inferno8–13-0.029%31 Jul
anubis13–80.0618%30 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0423%30 Jul
anubis5–130.0317%28 Jul
anubis13–60.0321%28 Jul
cache4–13-0.0517%26 Jul
mirage19–170.0422%22 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0217%22 Jul
mirage13–20.0217%21 Jul
mirage10–130.0617%18 Jul
inferno13–80.0420%18 Jul
mirage10–130.0332%16 Jul
mirage13–70.0725%16 Jul
ancient4–130.0322%14 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0214%13 Jul
nuke13–80.0115%12 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0621%9 Jul
mirage13–80.0025%8 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0811%7 Jul
anubis16–140.0321%5 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0322%4 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0133%4 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0015%3 Jul
mirage7–130.0129%3 Jul
anubis16–130.0626%3 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0716%2 Jul
cache13–80.0216%1 Jul
overpass13–110.0319%1 Jul
mirage12–160.0222%1 Jul
anubis11–130.0325%30 Jun
dust27–13-0.0129%29 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0728%28 Jun
anubis13–70.0524%28 Jun
dust22–13-0.0725%28 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0213%28 Jun
anubis13–110.0224%25 Jun
nuke10–130.0826%24 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0510%23 Jun
anubis13–50.0224%22 Jun
inferno19–16-0.0217%21 Jun
anubis13–60.1525%18 Jun
overpass11–130.0420%18 Jun
dust25–130.0120%13 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0223%12 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0932%8 Jun
mirage13–110.0224%6 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0129%5 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0331%31 May
nuke7–13-0.0511%16 May
mirage13–11-0.0433%14 May
inferno13–11-0.0122%13 May
mirage16–12-0.0121%13 May
nuke4–130.0022%13 May
mirage5–13-0.0125%13 May
anubis1–13-0.0710%10 May
ancient13–11-0.0525%10 May
nuke6–13-0.0317%10 May
anubis13–90.0115%10 May
vertigo13–110.0426%10 May
nuke13–11-0.0025%10 May
mirage11–130.0226%10 May
inferno13–90.0316%9 May
mirage13–100.0326%9 May
vertigo8–130.0429%9 May
nuke2–130.0533%7 May
mirage13–60.0927%4 May
dust25–8-0.064%4 May
anubis13–11-0.0118%4 May
mirage4–130.0130%3 May
mirage3–130.0226%2 May
mirage16–140.008%2 May
anubis16–140.0218%2 May
mirage10–130.0330%1 May
cache9–13-0.1030%1 May
inferno13–10-0.0014%30 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0420%29 Apr
inferno13–110.0022%29 Apr
mirage13–70.0617%27 Apr
inferno13–50.0423%27 Apr
nuke12–160.0111%27 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →