MaDt0m

MaDt0m — CS2 Stats

GB76561198155488137[U:1:195222409]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,498Tracked matches56%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,906 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMaDt0mFACEITLevel 10 · 2,906 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning68
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY454510Last 10045%Win rateWTLTLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.0
Aggression9.9
Utility4.1
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels4.9
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning6.8
Utility4.1
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact7.0

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time603ms+26ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 603ms
Headshot accuracy28.4%+6.1%
first ⅓ avg 22.4% → last ⅓ avg 28.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — overpass 13–10
133Biggest win — train
4Longest win streak
37In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 57% over 7ancientWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B158753%0.03
ancientC145936%0.01
anubisB136746%0.03
trainA116555%0.07
infernoC114736%0.03
overpassC104640%0.04
nukeC94544%0.03
mirageA74357%0.02
cache43175%0.06
shelter1010%0.04
fachwerk1010%-0.01
boulder110100%0.17
alpine1010%0.02
stronghold1010%0.06
warden1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,971Matches
52%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
80.0ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient67958%1.2016.5
Dust249155%1.1516.2
Anubis48954%1.2317.0
Mirage30547%1.0815.5
Inferno12641%1.0914.3
Train11044%1.2016.4
Nuke10341%1.0815.1
Overpass9152%1.0115.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.3%Headshot accuracy
39.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.6%Spray accuracy
87.7%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
598msReaction time
37.7%T opening success
61.4%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
6.79HE damage / grenade
4.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4452 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.6794% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
train13–30.0320%14 Aug
overpass12–120.0317%14 Aug
inferno2–130.0237%8 Aug
dust212–120.0419%8 Aug
shelter2–130.0435%25 Jul
fachwerk5–13-0.0139%25 Jul
boulder13–50.1738%25 Jul
anubis13–90.0021%13 Jul
anubis10–130.0320%11 Jul
inferno13–100.0424%3 Jul
train13–50.1025%27 Jun
train12–120.0531%19 Jun
overpass8–130.0622%12 Jun
overpass8–130.0243%5 Jun
ancient11–10.09100%5 Jun
overpass2–13-0.0536%1 Jun
mirage13–90.0711%29 May
cache0–130.0018%29 May
nuke9–130.0329%15 May
inferno12–120.1031%15 May
cache13–70.1025%9 May
dust213–90.1321%9 May
cache13–50.1019%8 May
inferno12–120.0428%8 May
cache11–10.0432%8 May
dust213–7-0.1218%4 May
ancient13–8-0.0526%4 May
ancient2–13-0.0325%27 Apr
overpass13–100.2026%23 Apr
train6–130.0423%23 Apr
ancient13–60.0325%22 Apr
dust213–90.1935%18 Apr
mirage5–130.0422%17 Apr
anubis13–60.1420%17 Apr
anubis13–100.0825%16 Apr
train13–60.1121%11 Apr
nuke13–90.1323%5 Apr
mirage1–13-0.0131%5 Apr
mirage13–110.0622%2 Apr
ancient12–120.0436%2 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0436%1 Apr
inferno13–90.0529%28 Mar
ancient7–13-0.0132%24 Mar
anubis11–130.0629%24 Mar
dust213–5-0.0319%16 Mar
overpass1–13-0.0026%16 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0118%16 Mar
anubis12–12-0.0030%16 Mar
nuke9–130.0022%6 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0522%3 Mar
train12–120.0229%28 Feb
ancient13–90.0719%28 Feb
alpine6–130.0221%27 Feb
overpass13–80.0222%27 Feb
train13–100.1430%27 Feb
dust210–130.0320%21 Feb
stronghold5–130.0643%20 Feb
inferno5–13-0.0238%20 Feb
ancient13–110.0021%20 Feb
anubis13–90.0427%18 Feb
anubis6–13-0.0536%17 Feb
nuke13–50.0816%14 Feb
overpass13–70.0325%10 Feb
nuke13–40.0917%9 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0124%7 Feb
overpass9–130.0113%6 Feb
warden11–13-0.0320%6 Feb
dust24–13-0.0327%6 Feb
nuke9–13-0.0511%2 Feb
dust213–80.0318%2 Feb
dust216–130.0225%30 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0215%28 Jan
nuke2–13-0.115%27 Jan
anubis13–100.0422%25 Jan
inferno13–80.0625%25 Jan
anubis16–130.0123%22 Jan
dust212–12-0.0314%17 Jan
ancient6–130.1225%17 Jan
mirage13–7-0.0124%14 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0016%10 Jan
anubis10–13-0.0227%10 Jan
train9–130.0124%6 Jan
ancient4–13-0.0421%5 Jan
dust24–130.0340%2 Jan
inferno13–40.0448%2 Jan
ancient14–16-0.0027%31 Dec
inferno9–13-0.0321%28 Dec
train6–130.0417%24 Dec
nuke7–130.0120%24 Dec
train13–50.0816%21 Dec
dust212–120.0729%21 Dec
anubis9–130.1026%17 Dec
dust24–30.0910%17 Dec
mirage8–30.0223%17 Dec
inferno7–130.0926%17 Dec
dust213–90.0521%15 Dec
train13–30.1016%11 Dec
overpass13–60.0839%10 Dec
dust211–130.0411%10 Dec
nuke13–100.1229%10 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →