SojuPapi — CS2 Stats

76561198152239229[U:1:191973501]

1,158Tracked matches38%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating16,975Purple band · top ~20.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9798 of 16813 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,169 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSojuPapiFACEITLevel 6 · 1,169 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER16,975 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning42
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43534Last 10043%Win rateLLLLWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression2.1
Utility6.5
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.2
Utility6.5
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels0.3
Win Impact1.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time594ms−6ms
first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — anubis 13–6
130Biggest win — inferno
4Longest win streak
L4Current streak
64In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 12dust2Weakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisD2261627%-0.02
cacheC1761135%-0.02
ancientA1710759%-0.00
mirageA159660%-0.01
dust2D1331023%-0.02
infernoS129375%-0.00
nuke4040%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

42Matches
50%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
82.1ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21145%0.8114.2
Inferno944%1.0717.3
Anubis650%0.8513.5
Overpass560%1.2117.4
Mirage560%0.7416.2
Ancient450%0.9813.3
Nuke250%0.7915.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.4%Headshot accuracy
31.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.3%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
597msReaction time
22.8%T opening success
32.1%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
10.37HE damage / grenade
14.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.7934% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0421%28 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0724%28 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0712%28 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0117%28 Aug
cache13–8-0.0017%27 Aug
inferno1–13-0.0717%27 Aug
dust213–110.0217%27 Aug
cache9–130.0122%27 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0615%23 Aug
dust28–13-0.0618%23 Aug
dust210–13-0.0119%22 Aug
mirage13–100.0122%22 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0127%22 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0520%22 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0321%21 Aug
cache6–13-0.0414%20 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0321%14 Aug
dust27–13-0.0323%14 Aug
mirage13–6-0.039%14 Aug
cache10–13-0.0315%14 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0515%14 Aug
ancient13–60.024%14 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0423%13 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0124%13 Aug
inferno13–00.0317%13 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0418%12 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0124%12 Aug
cache13–3-0.0215%11 Aug
dust213–16-0.0716%11 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0119%8 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0221%6 Aug
cache8–13-0.0127%6 Aug
cache9–13-0.0617%5 Aug
mirage10–130.0316%5 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0312%4 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0715%4 Aug
inferno13–100.0127%4 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0119%2 Aug
inferno13–80.0620%2 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0516%2 Aug
mirage13–100.0525%2 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0518%2 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0811%2 Aug
anubis15–150.0116%2 Aug
dust23–13-0.0314%2 Aug
ancient13–50.0314%2 Aug
cache8–130.0418%2 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0120%1 Aug
dust22–13-0.0811%1 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0314%1 Aug
cache13–60.0022%31 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0313%31 Jul
ancient13–60.0415%28 Jul
inferno16–12-0.0214%27 Jul
dust213–70.0625%27 Jul
nuke13–16-0.0023%26 Jul
ancient8–130.0711%26 Jul
anubis13–100.0021%26 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0313%25 Jul
inferno13–30.0713%25 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0117%25 Jul
dust216–13-0.0220%25 Jul
cache5–13-0.073%25 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0210%25 Jul
ancient7–13-0.1114%25 Jul
anubis11–130.0118%25 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0319%25 Jul
dust24–13-0.0521%24 Jul
mirage16–140.0214%24 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0319%24 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0731%21 Jul
cache13–9-0.0416%19 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0513%18 Jul
dust21–13-0.0615%18 Jul
ancient13–10.0713%18 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0616%18 Jul
anubis13–100.0019%17 Jul
anubis11–130.0224%17 Jul
cache10–130.0029%16 Jul
inferno16–13-0.0017%12 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0511%12 Jul
ancient13–00.0918%12 Jul
ancient16–130.0222%11 Jul
cache3–13-0.0614%11 Jul
anubis13–60.0926%11 Jul
ancient13–9-0.048%11 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0311%11 Jul
dust28–130.0332%11 Jul
mirage13–80.0113%11 Jul
cache9–13-0.0013%11 Jul
cache5–13-0.1011%10 Jul
inferno8–130.0318%10 Jul
mirage16–12-0.0112%10 Jul
cache13–11-0.0610%8 Jul
cache13–50.0414%8 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0415%3 Jul
dust215–15-0.0118%3 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0018%3 Jul
ancient16–13-0.0118%3 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0610%3 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →