Kn0ckz

Kn0ckz — CS2 Stats

CA76561198149884391[U:1:189618663]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

449Tracked matches57%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKn0ckzFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning43
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT61381Last 10061%Win rateWLWWWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8
Aggression3.1
Utility3.5
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 628ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.3
Utility3.5
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels0.3
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time626ms+23ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 626ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%+4.5%
first ⅓ avg 14.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — inferno 13–2
130Biggest win — anubis
8Longest win streak
46In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 31infernoWeakest map · 53% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA32181456%-0.01
anubisS3122971%-0.00
infernoB1910953%-0.01
dust2S75271%-0.01
ancientA53260%0.00
nuke31233%-0.05
train21150%-0.00
cache110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (53% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

225Matches
64%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
68.1ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis5670%1.0513.0
Inferno3770%1.2214.2
Mirage3749%0.9112.1
Dust22152%1.2115.6
Ancient667%1.0915.5
Vertigo367%0.8616.3
Train250%0.9213.5
Nuke10%0.5511.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
34.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.6%Spray accuracy
84.1%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
628msReaction time
32.2%T opening success
28.1%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
8.08HE damage / grenade
8.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.2492% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–20.1124%2 Aug
anubis0–6-0.0350%2 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0310%28 Jul
anubis13–100.0427%27 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0614%27 Jul
ancient13–110.0319%25 Jul
ancient4–7-0.0113%21 Jul
cache13–80.0129%21 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0218%21 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0323%21 Jul
mirage13–100.0118%1 Feb
mirage13–60.0223%4 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0623%4 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0316%4 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0723%4 Jul
dust216–14-0.0113%23 Jun
mirage11–13-0.019%23 Jun
mirage13–4-0.0124%23 May
mirage9–13-0.0327%19 Apr
dust213–30.0418%13 Apr
nuke12–16-0.0611%10 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0215%5 Apr
anubis6–13-0.0618%5 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0513%5 Apr
anubis13–80.0414%4 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0615%4 Apr
inferno13–5-0.0317%4 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0528%3 Apr
anubis13–90.0014%3 Apr
mirage13–160.0124%3 Apr
dust213–10-0.0217%3 Apr
anubis13–11-0.0213%25 Mar
mirage13–16-0.0215%24 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0217%24 Mar
anubis13–10-0.0214%23 Mar
inferno13–80.019%23 Mar
mirage13–70.0323%23 Mar
dust212–16-0.0421%23 Mar
anubis9–130.0022%23 Mar
anubis13–100.0117%22 Mar
anubis19–150.0011%21 Mar
inferno13–16-0.0015%19 Mar
dust215–15-0.0913%19 Mar
anubis13–50.010%19 Mar
mirage9–130.0115%19 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0538%15 Mar
inferno5–130.0310%15 Mar
inferno13–80.0013%13 Mar
anubis13–20.0613%13 Mar
train11–13-0.047%13 Mar
mirage13–50.0131%12 Mar
mirage3–9-0.046%11 Mar
dust213–80.0324%10 Mar
anubis13–5-0.0114%10 Mar
mirage13–100.0214%9 Mar
inferno13–7-0.0218%9 Mar
anubis13–70.0116%9 Mar
inferno4–2-0.0129%7 Mar
mirage13–6-0.0314%7 Mar
inferno13–40.0324%4 Mar
anubis13–20.0214%2 Mar
nuke13–2-0.0131%2 Mar
train13–80.0415%1 Mar
anubis13–7-0.0220%1 Mar
anubis13–80.0318%1 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0125%1 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0118%1 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0120%28 Feb
inferno2–13-0.0817%27 Feb
anubis13–70.022%26 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0514%25 Feb
anubis5–13-0.066%24 Feb
mirage5–13-0.067%24 Feb
inferno20–22-0.0311%24 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0110%24 Feb
anubis13–100.0113%23 Feb
inferno13–3-0.0513%23 Feb
nuke4–13-0.0911%22 Feb
mirage13–20.0827%22 Feb
anubis13–100.0326%21 Feb
anubis12–60.0422%20 Feb
mirage13–5-0.0217%19 Feb
mirage7–130.0420%18 Feb
inferno10–13-0.0713%18 Feb
dust213–110.0312%18 Feb
inferno13–70.0222%17 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0813%17 Feb
anubis13–70.0416%17 Feb
anubis13–00.0212%17 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0412%17 Feb
mirage13–7-0.0113%16 Feb
mirage13–9-0.012%15 Feb
inferno13–40.0511%14 Feb
mirage13–5-0.0319%14 Feb
ancient13–40.0725%13 Feb
mirage13–90.0318%13 Feb
inferno16–13-0.0220%12 Feb
anubis6–13-0.0113%10 Feb
anubis13–3-0.0217%10 Feb
anubis13–40.0013%10 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →