oSH

oSH — CS2 Stats

US76561198147471961[U:1:187206233]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

147Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,758Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3550 of 9934 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGoSHFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER21,758 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning52
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58393Last 10058%Win rateWWWLTLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.5
Aggression7.1
Utility5.5
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch0.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 90% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.2
Utility5.5
Mechanics8.9
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time559ms−68ms
first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 559ms
Headshot accuracy24.1%−2.5%
first ⅓ avg 26.6% → last ⅓ avg 24.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — inferno 13–4
130Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 86% over 14ancientWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB35191654%-0.01
dust2A27161159%0.00
infernoS1412286%0.02
ancientC83538%0.01
cacheA85363%0.01
overpass42250%-0.03
anubis2020%-0.06
nuke21150%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

107Matches
54%Win rate
1.26Avg K/D
79.4ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

11%1v1 clutch win
8%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1250%1.1013.8
Dust2650%0.8514.8
Ancient540%1.0212.2
Cache475%1.4517.0
Anubis10%0.447.0
Overpass10%0.5614.0
Inferno10%1.2222.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.9%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.0%Spray accuracy
90.1%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
580msReaction time
35.1%T opening success
48.3%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
9.42HE damage / grenade
8.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.0586% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–10-0.0126%3 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0021%27 Jul
dust213–10.0333%27 Jul
mirage7–130.0118%27 Jul
dust215–150.0133%26 Jul
dust210–13-0.0831%26 Jul
dust213–30.1423%26 Jul
mirage13–90.0238%25 Jul
mirage8–13-0.074%25 Jul
dust26–13-0.0716%25 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0329%25 Jul
dust24–13-0.0428%23 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0532%23 Jul
cache13–3-0.0330%23 Jul
mirage11–130.0018%23 Jul
inferno6–130.0036%23 Jul
ancient13–70.0224%23 Jul
dust213–100.0219%22 Jul
mirage13–10.0723%20 Jul
mirage5–0-0.040%20 Jul
cache9–130.0231%20 Jul
dust28–130.0132%20 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0321%20 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0132%18 Jul
ancient6–130.0127%18 Jul
dust213–00.000%18 Jul
mirage13–1-0.0026%18 Jul
mirage13–90.0713%17 Jul
inferno13–90.0320%16 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0229%15 Jul
cache7–13-0.0122%14 Jul
cache13–110.0228%14 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0430%14 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0624%13 Jul
dust213–8-0.0425%13 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0520%13 Jul
mirage11–130.1331%12 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0219%12 Jul
dust216–14-0.0221%12 Jul
dust210–13-0.0417%11 Jul
inferno13–60.0315%11 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0413%11 Jul
inferno13–3-0.0510%11 Jul
dust213–50.0130%11 Jul
cache9–130.0223%11 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0724%11 Jul
dust23–130.0120%10 Jul
nuke13–60.0321%10 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0132%9 Jul
cache13–50.0137%9 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0832%8 Jul
ancient3–130.0224%7 Jul
cache13–90.0527%7 Jul
mirage16–130.0225%6 Jul
ancient13–40.0221%6 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0520%6 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0328%4 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0513%4 Jul
inferno11–130.0233%4 Jul
dust213–110.0225%3 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0236%2 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0235%2 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0023%2 Jul
cache13–90.0220%1 Jul
overpass1–100.0111%30 Jun
inferno13–50.1025%29 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0423%29 Jun
dust215–150.0118%27 Jun
dust213–50.0425%27 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0819%27 Jun
overpass13–10-0.0513%27 Jun
mirage16–140.0615%25 Jun
dust213–11-0.0118%23 Jun
dust213–5-0.0116%23 Jun
mirage13–40.0437%23 Jun
dust213–40.0343%23 Jun
dust213–16-0.0327%23 Jun
inferno13–70.0224%22 Jun
ancient13–60.0820%22 Jun
dust213–40.0425%22 Jun
overpass15–15-0.0417%22 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0575%22 Jun
dust213–70.1127%22 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0520%20 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0629%20 Jun
dust213–90.0632%19 Jun
dust214–16-0.0325%19 Jun
mirage13–70.0218%19 Jun
mirage13–80.0640%18 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0130%18 Jun
inferno13–60.0738%18 Jun
inferno13–90.0132%17 Jun
dust22–7-0.1340%17 Jun
overpass13–6-0.069%15 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0134%15 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0429%15 Jun
dust213–50.0320%15 Jun
inferno13–1-0.0112%15 Jun
inferno11–3-0.0332%15 Jun
inferno13–40.1622%13 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →