Lord Flacko

Lord Flacko — CS2 Stats

JP76561198144068509[U:1:183802781]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,274Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,511Pink band · top ~7.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7283 of 17825 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,457 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLord FlackoFACEITLevel 9 · 1,457 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER20,511 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning54
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48484Last 10048%Win rateLWWLWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.9
Aggression6.6
Utility5.3
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.4
Utility5.3
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time519ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 566ms → last ⅓ avg 519ms
Headshot accuracy21.1%+3.4%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 21.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — inferno 13–3
132Biggest win — dust2
7Longest win streak
610In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 57% over 7ancientWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB32171553%0.01
dust2B22101245%0.02
infernoB126650%0.04
nukeB105550%-0.00
ancientD103730%-0.01
anubisC73443%0.04
cacheA74357%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,144Matches
51%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
80.8ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11254%1.1616.6
Dust29355%1.1717.0
Anubis4243%1.1715.9
Ancient3735%1.0916.2
Inferno3364%1.2016.9
Nuke2148%1.0114.3
Cache1450%1.2317.7
Vertigo650%1.2219.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy
36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.3%Spray accuracy
73.9%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
507msReaction time
29.5%T opening success
51.8%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
12.20HE damage / grenade
7.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.5422% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis11–13-0.0019%28 Aug
cache13–90.0331%28 Aug
anubis16–130.0419%27 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0115%27 Aug
dust213–20.1221%27 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0421%27 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0035%26 Aug
dust213–60.1419%26 Aug
dust213–70.0516%25 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0524%25 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0522%25 Aug
mirage8–130.0213%25 Aug
inferno11–130.0119%24 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0219%24 Aug
dust210–130.0113%24 Aug
mirage13–100.0430%24 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0135%21 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0220%21 Aug
nuke13–80.0122%21 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0635%20 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0217%20 Aug
inferno11–130.0419%20 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0212%17 Aug
mirage13–60.0226%16 Aug
dust22–130.0427%16 Aug
dust213–9-0.0017%16 Aug
dust217–190.0418%15 Aug
cache19–22-0.0318%14 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0314%14 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0516%12 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0215%12 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0528%11 Aug
mirage13–110.0521%11 Aug
dust213–60.0713%11 Aug
anubis13–90.1725%10 Aug
nuke13–90.0816%9 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0425%8 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0025%8 Aug
dust211–13-0.0417%8 Aug
nuke9–130.0213%6 Aug
inferno9–130.0116%4 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0619%4 Aug
mirage13–70.0622%4 Aug
dust213–30.1718%4 Aug
dust213–10-0.0316%4 Aug
cache13–110.0432%4 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0513%4 Aug
dust22–13-0.074%3 Aug
dust29–13-0.0129%1 Aug
inferno13–20.1222%1 Aug
inferno2–130.0414%1 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0511%31 Jul
nuke16–13-0.0312%30 Jul
dust21–13-0.0329%29 Jul
dust216–120.0414%28 Jul
mirage13–70.1316%27 Jul
mirage13–100.0627%27 Jul
anubis13–90.0316%24 Jul
mirage13–60.0820%23 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0111%22 Jul
mirage13–30.0715%22 Jul
nuke11–130.0217%22 Jul
mirage13–50.0822%22 Jul
cache7–13-0.0320%22 Jul
dust213–110.0215%21 Jul
mirage10–130.0115%21 Jul
dust27–13-0.0115%21 Jul
inferno13–30.0145%20 Jul
anubis9–130.0319%20 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0016%20 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0724%20 Jul
mirage13–30.1329%20 Jul
ancient9–130.0520%20 Jul
ancient10–130.0022%20 Jul
dust29–130.0121%19 Jul
cache13–50.0210%19 Jul
mirage13–110.0517%19 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0311%18 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0216%18 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0615%16 Jul
dust215–15-0.0119%15 Jul
mirage11–130.0017%15 Jul
dust27–130.0119%14 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0116%13 Jul
dust213–80.0510%13 Jul
dust25–13-0.0913%13 Jul
inferno13–30.2011%13 Jul
ancient13–70.0313%12 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0311%12 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0420%12 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0311%12 Jul
mirage13–40.0418%12 Jul
mirage12–160.0120%11 Jul
ancient13–60.0612%11 Jul
inferno13–20.1120%11 Jul
cache7–130.0117%11 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0014%11 Jul
anubis11–130.0125%11 Jul
cache13–10-0.0321%11 Jul
ancient11–130.0115%11 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →