scozza_ — CS2 Stats

76561198138197162[U:1:177931434]✓ No bans

1,077Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,894Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7960 of 33200 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGscozza_FACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER22,894 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning51
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53425Last 10053%Win rateLLWWLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.0
Aggression8.7
Utility5.3
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch4.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 65% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 65% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning5.1
Utility5.3
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time493ms−70ms
first ⅓ avg 563ms → last ⅓ avg 493ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — nuke 13–0
130Biggest win — nuke
6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
43In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 9anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB29151452%0.00
dust2B23121152%0.01
cacheB21111052%0.02
ancientA116555%0.03
nukeS96367%0.04
anubisD62433%0.02
inferno110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

349Matches
50%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
80.5ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9257%1.1215.9
Dust26047%1.0715.4
Nuke3441%0.9514.3
Ancient2857%0.9716.0
Inferno1833%0.8614.4
Cache1753%1.0314.5
Anubis1136%0.8615.4
Overpass922%0.7412.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
40.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.6%Spray accuracy
84.8%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
495msReaction time
31.1%T opening success
64.7%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
9.99HE damage / grenade
7.71Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.0758% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust216–190.029%26 Aug
cache3–13-0.119%24 Aug
nuke13–100.0515%24 Aug
cache13–8-0.0016%23 Aug
ancient10–130.0113%23 Aug
dust213–10-0.0124%23 Aug
cache9–130.0114%23 Aug
inferno13–100.0114%22 Aug
dust213–20.0415%22 Aug
cache13–160.0423%21 Aug
dust213–100.0124%20 Aug
cache4–13-0.0221%20 Aug
dust215–15-0.0515%20 Aug
cache13–11-0.0134%20 Aug
anubis13–60.0925%19 Aug
dust27–13-0.0323%19 Aug
ancient13–70.029%18 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0313%18 Aug
dust213–16-0.0231%18 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0111%18 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0817%17 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0426%17 Aug
mirage10–13-0.089%17 Aug
mirage13–60.0214%15 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0217%15 Aug
mirage13–60.0322%15 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0113%14 Aug
mirage13–40.0412%14 Aug
nuke13–80.0320%14 Aug
mirage13–160.0921%13 Aug
dust213–70.0713%13 Aug
dust23–13-0.0118%12 Aug
mirage13–100.0430%12 Aug
nuke13–00.1626%12 Aug
ancient13–60.1415%12 Aug
ancient13–10.0226%12 Aug
cache13–20.0916%12 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0116%12 Aug
mirage3–13-0.086%12 Aug
mirage13–80.0117%11 Aug
dust213–8-0.0312%11 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0112%7 Aug
anubis7–130.0316%7 Aug
mirage15–150.0114%7 Aug
dust29–13-0.0312%6 Aug
mirage11–130.0515%6 Aug
cache5–13-0.0416%5 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0315%5 Aug
cache1–13-0.1017%5 Aug
mirage16–140.0217%4 Aug
anubis8–130.0117%4 Aug
cache13–10.1310%4 Aug
dust213–30.079%1 Aug
cache13–110.0520%1 Aug
dust26–13-0.0316%1 Aug
cache13–90.1014%1 Aug
mirage13–100.019%31 Jul
ancient13–60.0016%31 Jul
ancient12–16-0.0423%31 Jul
cache13–100.0218%31 Jul
dust213–6-0.0229%30 Jul
cache13–100.0817%30 Jul
cache5–130.0613%30 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0119%30 Jul
dust213–70.1114%30 Jul
dust29–13-0.018%29 Jul
mirage11–130.0818%29 Jul
mirage13–80.0216%29 Jul
nuke6–130.0115%29 Jul
cache13–80.0718%28 Jul
ancient13–60.1218%28 Jul
cache4–130.0030%28 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0116%28 Jul
ancient13–100.0311%27 Jul
dust215–150.0619%27 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0615%27 Jul
anubis15–150.0416%27 Jul
dust213–8-0.0121%27 Jul
dust211–130.0114%26 Jul
ancient10–130.0321%25 Jul
dust28–13-0.0414%25 Jul
cache13–100.0020%25 Jul
dust213–90.0213%25 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0512%25 Jul
cache6–13-0.0019%25 Jul
mirage15–150.0421%25 Jul
nuke13–90.0911%24 Jul
dust213–70.0515%24 Jul
mirage13–9-0.078%24 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0122%24 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0024%24 Jul
mirage13–110.0123%24 Jul
nuke9–130.0216%23 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0020%23 Jul
nuke13–90.0425%22 Jul
cache13–160.0319%22 Jul
cache13–90.0112%22 Jul
dust213–50.0213%22 Jul
ancient10–130.0515%22 Jul
mirage13–90.0421%21 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →