Gi0 — CS2 Stats

76561198137257650[U:1:176991922]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,239Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating24,999Top 25% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#6873 of 55841 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,883 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82

Positioning54

Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY61–34–5Last 10061%Win rateWWLLLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.2

Aggression3.9

Utility5.5

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels1.0

Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.7° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2

Positioning5.4

Utility5.5

Mechanics7.3

Opening Duels1.5

Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time592ms+39ms

first ⅓ avg 553ms → last ⅓ avg 592ms

Headshot accuracy17.4%−0.7%

first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — dust2 13–4

13–0Biggest win — cache

12Longest win streak

W2Current streak

5–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 72% over 25ancientWeakest map · 46% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	S	25	18–7	72%	0.02
dust2	A	22	12–10	55%	0.01
cache	A	18	11–7	61%	0.03
ancient	B	13	6–7	46%	0.02
anubis	A	8	5–3	63%	0.01
inferno	A	7	4–3	57%	0.01
overpass	—	4	3–1	75%	0.02
nuke	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.01
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (46% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

6,295Matches

52%Win rate

1.06Avg K/D

77.9ADR

40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	957	52%	1.07	16.0
Ancient	636	51%	1.05	16.1
Dust2	571	55%	1.03	15.4
Anubis	350	49%	1.05	16.0
Inferno	340	57%	1.05	15.8
Vertigo	179	51%	1.08	17.0
Overpass	178	53%	1.12	16.3
Nuke	91	43%	1.04	15.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy

39.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

45.9%Spray accuracy

82.7%Counter-strafing

10.7°Preaim

571msReaction time

26.3%T opening success

41.9%CT opening success

0.61Enemies flashed / flash

5.1%Flash assists

8.11HE damage / grenade

9.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.2512% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

46% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–11	0.10	27%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.03	16%	18 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.05	10%	17 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.02	30%	17 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.02	24%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.01	25%	13 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.03	21%	9 Aug →
anubis	16–14	0.07	12%	7 Aug →
cache	13–0	0.12	21%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.05	22%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.06	17%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	13%	6 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.03	12%	5 Aug →
mirage	16–19	-0.07	20%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.05	11%	5 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.02	11%	3 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.12	24%	3 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.04	8%	2 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.13	13%	2 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.02	29%	1 Aug →
dust2	4–13	0.01	38%	1 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.04	28%	31 Jul →
vertigo	13–5	-0.00	10%	31 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.10	15%	31 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.01	7%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–7	-0.02	12%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–8	-0.05	15%	24 Jul →
ancient	4–13	0.01	17%	24 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.04	13%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.03	15%	21 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.02	12%	13 Jul →
dust2	12–1	0.00	19%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.01	6%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.14	21%	12 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.07	36%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.10	13%	12 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.02	11%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.02	16%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.08	9%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.05	22%	12 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.09	18%	10 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.09	14%	10 Jul →
mirage	0–13	-0.06	0%	3 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.08	35%	3 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.07	9%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.08	26%	1 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.01	22%	1 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.07	43%	30 Jun →
anubis	13–2	0.00	27%	28 Jun →
ancient	13–2	0.11	21%	27 Jun →
dust2	12–12	-0.05	18%	25 Jun →
mirage	10–4	-0.02	22%	25 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.08	23%	23 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.09	33%	21 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.02	18%	19 Jun →
ancient	12–16	0.01	6%	19 Jun →
inferno	19–16	-0.02	11%	17 Jun →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	10%	17 Jun →
cache	13–10	0.02	6%	16 Jun →
ancient	16–13	-0.01	11%	15 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	15%	8 Jun →
nuke	0–4	-0.10	100%	8 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.05	33%	8 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	6%	3 Jun →
mirage	13–2	-0.03	0%	3 Jun →
ancient	13–7	0.08	13%	3 Jun →
dust2	13–3	0.02	12%	1 Jun →
inferno	1–0	0.00	0%	1 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.05	10%	1 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.09	17%	1 Jun →
ancient	8–13	0.03	23%	1 Jun →
inferno	8–8	0.01	17%	30 May →
dust2	13–11	0.00	11%	30 May →
overpass	13–5	0.02	17%	30 May →
mirage	13–6	-0.02	11%	30 May →
dust2	13–8	0.04	22%	28 May →
mirage	13–8	0.07	13%	28 May →
ancient	13–2	0.07	23%	27 May →
dust2	13–7	0.04	20%	23 May →
ancient	13–8	0.05	14%	15 May →
dust2	4–13	-0.04	11%	14 May →
overpass	13–4	-0.01	19%	14 May →
inferno	13–9	0.03	28%	11 May →
overpass	11–13	0.00	18%	9 May →
cache	13–8	-0.01	24%	7 May →
cache	12–12	0.07	23%	7 May →
cache	13–6	0.06	23%	7 May →
cache	5–13	-0.03	19%	7 May →
inferno	2–13	-0.01	21%	3 May →
mirage	13–7	-0.02	15%	2 May →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	24%	2 May →
cache	13–8	-0.00	21%	1 May →
cache	7–13	0.03	30%	1 May →
cache	13–7	0.01	20%	1 May →
ancient	6–13	-0.07	14%	30 Apr →
overpass	13–4	0.09	24%	30 Apr →
mirage	13–8	0.03	17%	27 Apr →
anubis	6–13	0.01	18%	27 Apr →
ancient	15–15	0.01	15%	27 Apr →
dust2	13–16	0.02	15%	23 Apr →