Nilsgaard

Nilsgaard — CS2 Stats

DE76561198137160568[U:1:176894840]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,882Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,620Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5351 of 35646 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,528 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNilsgaardFACEITLevel 7 · 1,528 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER24,620 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning54
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46504Last 10046%Win rateLLWLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.0
Aggression7.7
Utility5.0
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch3.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 594ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.4
Utility5.0
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time594ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 623ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — dust2 13–3
132Biggest win — nuke
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
134In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 64% over 22ancientWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B31151648%-0.01
infernoA2214864%0.00
nukeC1771041%-0.01
ancientD1331023%-0.00
mirageB63350%-0.03
overpassD62433%-0.01
cache41325%-0.03
anubis110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,841Matches
50%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
75.9ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage20649%0.9915.1
Inferno17951%1.0915.8
Dust216246%0.9715.1
Nuke14556%1.0415.2
Ancient8848%1.0214.7
Overpass7555%1.0315.1
Anubis1346%0.9213.5
Vertigo30%0.489.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.6%Spray accuracy
85.7%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
594msReaction time
42.4%T opening success
52.2%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
8.0%Flash assists
9.56HE damage / grenade
3.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.4478 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage5–13-0.077%5 Aug
dust27–13-0.0328%5 Aug
dust213–110.0126%31 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0316%31 Jul
dust27–130.0025%31 Jul
ancient10–130.0313%31 Jul
inferno13–90.0520%31 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0115%30 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0223%30 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0719%30 Jul
inferno13–70.0016%30 Jul
nuke10–130.0017%27 Jul
dust211–13-0.0211%27 Jul
ancient2–130.0116%27 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0215%27 Jul
inferno13–60.0729%27 Jul
dust24–13-0.018%25 Jul
dust213–9-0.0715%25 Jul
dust213–4-0.0114%18 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0812%18 Jul
nuke13–70.0520%18 Jul
dust213–30.1123%18 Jul
inferno13–7-0.047%18 Jul
dust29–130.0218%18 Jul
cache10–13-0.0413%18 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0330%18 Jul
ancient4–130.0716%18 Jul
mirage10–130.0316%15 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0213%15 Jul
mirage13–30.0013%15 Jul
dust23–13-0.0823%14 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0114%14 Jul
dust213–8-0.0422%14 Jul
nuke3–130.0020%14 Jul
dust213–70.0116%14 Jul
ancient10–130.0315%14 Jul
inferno8–130.0311%14 Jul
inferno13–100.0112%14 Jul
dust29–13-0.0224%12 Jul
ancient13–70.0212%11 Jul
nuke8–130.1020%11 Jul
dust213–6-0.0311%11 Jul
dust24–13-0.088%11 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0822%10 Jul
dust212–16-0.0527%10 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0229%10 Jul
dust213–100.0134%10 Jul
dust213–6-0.0111%10 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0111%10 Jul
ancient13–80.0417%10 Jul
cache7–13-0.0721%10 Jul
inferno13–110.0421%10 Jul
dust213–50.0740%10 Jul
dust29–13-0.0226%9 Jul
cache13–110.0122%9 Jul
ancient8–130.0322%9 Jul
nuke15–15-0.097%9 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0511%9 Jul
inferno11–130.0222%8 Jul
nuke13–50.0516%8 Jul
mirage6–4-0.0415%8 Jul
anubis13–80.0216%8 Jul
cache3–13-0.0421%8 Jul
dust21–13-0.0511%5 Jul
dust213–11-0.0717%2 Jul
nuke13–2-0.0016%2 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0333%2 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0721%2 Jul
inferno13–100.0114%1 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0311%1 Jul
inferno9–130.0114%1 Jul
overpass16–13-0.0322%1 Jul
dust213–11-0.0119%1 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0119%28 Jun
inferno13–50.049%28 Jun
dust213–110.0116%28 Jun
overpass9–13-0.0226%27 Jun
dust25–13-0.0323%27 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0121%27 Jun
inferno12–16-0.0016%27 Jun
dust24–13-0.0344%27 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0312%27 Jun
overpass13–40.0216%27 Jun
dust213–70.0319%27 Jun
inferno4–90.0041%27 Jun
dust24–130.0028%27 May
dust28–130.0720%27 May
nuke8–13-0.0438%27 May
dust29–13-0.0415%27 May
inferno15–15-0.0410%27 May
inferno13–11-0.0216%21 May
overpass8–13-0.0526%21 May
overpass11–13-0.0010%20 May
mirage2–13-0.0416%20 May
inferno16–140.0016%20 May
nuke6–130.0218%20 May
overpass12–120.0017%20 May
inferno9–13-0.0116%13 May
dust213–11-0.0621%13 May
inferno9–13-0.0018%13 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →