TrappieChan — CS2 Stats

US76561198136868779[U:1:176603051]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,216Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.4 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating18,951Purple band · top ~12.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#7255 of 14307 tracked

FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88

Positioning47

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–44–6Last 10050%Win rateWLWLWWLWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8

Aggression6.5

Utility4.9

Positioning4.7

Opening Duels3.0

Clutch1.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8

Positioning4.7

Utility4.9

Mechanics8.3

Opening Duels3.1

Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time596ms−28ms

first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms

Headshot accuracy25.2%+1.2%

first ⅓ avg 24.0% → last ⅓ avg 25.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — cache 13–7

13–0Biggest win — ancient

7Longest win streak

5–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 15infernoWeakest map · 33% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	A	23	14–9	61%	0.02
dust2	S	15	10–5	67%	0.00
anubis	C	14	6–8	43%	0.01
mirage	C	14	6–8	43%	0.03
nuke	C	11	4–7	36%	0.01
ancient	C	8	3–5	38%	0.04
inferno	D	6	2–4	33%	0.01
office	A	5	3–2	60%	0.00
vertigo	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.00
italy	—	1	1–0	100%	0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

578Matches

52%Win rate

1.07Avg K/D

86.5ADR

47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win

14%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	191	55%	1.06	16.6
Anubis	91	48%	1.00	15.1
Vertigo	79	48%	1.03	15.8
Inferno	67	58%	1.26	16.6
Overpass	47	60%	1.00	15.9
Nuke	37	30%	0.87	15.7
Ancient	29	41%	0.91	13.4
Dust2	6	67%	1.12	21.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.0%Headshot accuracy

39.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.4%Spray accuracy

87.2%Counter-strafing

10.2°Preaim

577msReaction time

29.5%T opening success

54.5%CT opening success

0.53Enemies flashed / flash

10.4%Flash assists

7.48HE damage / grenade

8.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.4662% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–6	-0.04	31%	25 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.04	21%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.06	18%	23 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.03	38%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.01	21%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.00	14%	10 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.05	30%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.04	21%	8 Aug →
nuke	12–12	-0.03	20%	6 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.04	28%	5 Aug →
anubis	2–13	-0.04	15%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–1	-0.00	33%	4 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.00	21%	4 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.06	53%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.00	21%	4 Aug →
inferno	4–13	0.05	20%	4 Aug →
vertigo	8–13	-0.05	40%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.01	24%	28 Jul →
vertigo	9–13	-0.04	7%	28 Jul →
office	11–13	0.01	34%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.01	44%	28 Jul →
italy	13–7	0.08	21%	28 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.00	16%	28 Jul →
dust2	4–13	0.00	33%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–7	-0.04	15%	28 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.06	16%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.11	38%	27 Jul →
dust2	3–13	0.01	16%	27 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.06	24%	27 Jul →
inferno	12–12	0.02	20%	27 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.06	21%	27 Jul →
cache	0–6	-0.10	30%	27 Jul →
mirage	12–12	0.04	25%	27 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.02	31%	26 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.01	13%	26 Jul →
anubis	6–13	0.13	31%	26 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.06	16%	22 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.05	20%	21 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.11	18%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.06	29%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	8%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.03	12%	21 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.03	29%	21 Jul →
cache	13–16	-0.04	29%	21 Jul →
anubis	3–13	-0.06	13%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	15%	21 Jul →
nuke	6–13	0.03	20%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.09	27%	20 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.03	28%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.07	9%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.05	39%	19 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.00	17%	19 Jul →
office	13–6	-0.01	35%	19 Jul →
office	13–5	-0.03	37%	19 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.09	7%	16 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.06	38%	15 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.04	17%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.01	16%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–0	0.13	14%	14 Jul →
dust2	16–13	0.01	27%	14 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.08	18%	14 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.03	26%	14 Jul →
cache	16–13	0.08	22%	14 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.02	30%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.06	22%	14 Jul →
mirage	12–16	-0.07	25%	13 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.10	19%	13 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.07	23%	13 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	26%	13 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.02	30%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.03	27%	11 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.07	17%	11 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.06	20%	8 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.08	15%	8 Jul →
vertigo	13–10	0.09	29%	8 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.03	36%	8 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.03	33%	7 Jul →
mirage	2–8	0.02	9%	7 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.01	25%	7 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.02	26%	7 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	15%	7 Jul →
office	7–13	-0.01	48%	7 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.08	33%	7 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.05	28%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.00	17%	6 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.09	17%	6 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.01	24%	6 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.05	27%	6 Jul →
mirage	5–13	0.01	25%	6 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.08	25%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.03	22%	6 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.15	28%	6 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.04	13%	6 Jul →
office	13–11	0.04	23%	6 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.02	26%	6 Jul →
inferno	15–15	0.05	26%	6 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.08	20%	6 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.08	11%	6 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.00	15%	5 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.12	30%	5 Jul →

Show all 100 matchesShow fewer

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Earl11 recent matches together

Milestones

1,000 Matches

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

Explore CSDB.gg

Sensitivity ConverterConvert sensitivity between CS2 and other games eDPI CalculatorCalculate your effective DPI cm/360 CalculatorMouse distance per full turn Resolution CalculatorCompare aspect ratios and resolutions Crosshair GeneratorBuild and preview custom crosshairs

Tools

Sticker Craft MakerPlan and price a CS2 sticker craft with live prices on every piece CS2 Stats TrackerLook up any player: Premier rating, Faceit level, matches and skill breakdown Trust Factor CheckerEstimate your CS2 Trust Factor from the signals Valve has acknowledged

Learn & Explore

Most Traded CS2 SkinsRanked by completed sales — transaction data, not listings Cheapest Knives in CS2Every knife type ranked by its cheapest live price Cheapest Gloves in CS2Every glove model ranked by its cheapest live price