BARTISSS — CS2 Stats

76561198136821036[U:1:176555308]✓ No bans

638Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,363 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBARTISSSFACEITLevel 7 · 1,363 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning50
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46513Last 10046%Win rateLTWLLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.7
Aggression7.6
Utility5.2
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning5.0
Utility5.2
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time624ms+2ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 624ms
Headshot accuracy26.3%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 23.9% → last ⅓ avg 26.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — cache 13–10
131Biggest win — anubis
5Longest win streak
510In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 86% over 7mirageWeakest map · 38% over 32
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC32122038%-0.01
dust2B21101148%0.00
infernoB136746%-0.00
anubisB115645%0.00
ancientB115645%0.02
cacheS76186%0.04
overpass32167%-0.01
train2020%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 32). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

822Matches
50%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
80.1ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15353%1.1717.2
Dust210250%1.0517.3
Ancient8845%1.1016.1
Inferno6754%1.0615.8
Anubis5942%1.0316.7
Overpass2070%1.3019.6
Nuke825%0.9917.3
Cache560%1.2318.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.7%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.6%Spray accuracy
74.9%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
618msReaction time
36.2%T opening success
53.9%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
6.32HE damage / grenade
6.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.1574% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 32 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust25–13-0.0513%27 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0517%25 Aug
cache13–9-0.0033%24 Aug
anubis2–10-0.0647%24 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0829%23 Aug
cache13–110.0316%19 Aug
mirage14–160.0115%16 Aug
inferno13–50.0015%16 Aug
inferno8–130.0232%16 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0123%15 Aug
dust213–100.0239%8 Aug
dust213–100.0434%24 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0536%21 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0438%18 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0216%17 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0733%17 Jul
mirage13–80.0125%16 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0224%14 Jul
dust213–80.0129%14 Jul
inferno8–130.0023%12 Jul
cache13–80.0619%12 Jul
cache13–70.0832%11 Jul
anubis10–20.0518%11 Jul
mirage13–80.0137%11 Jul
mirage10–130.0718%10 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0528%9 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0729%8 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0821%8 Jul
inferno2–13-0.1112%27 Jun
dust27–13-0.0124%24 Jun
dust214–160.0139%24 Jun
ancient13–100.0117%21 Jun
train11–130.0940%19 Jun
train9–13-0.0224%18 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0122%15 Jun
overpass13–3-0.0235%13 Jun
anubis13–80.0230%6 Jun
anubis13–50.0418%18 May
mirage7–130.0022%18 May
cache4–13-0.0150%16 May
dust211–130.0229%10 May
cache13–10-0.0217%7 May
cache13–100.1327%7 May
inferno13–20.0728%7 May
mirage13–40.0023%3 May
ancient13–70.0321%1 May
mirage7–130.0024%1 May
overpass11–13-0.0223%28 Apr
mirage13–4-0.0219%16 Apr
dust213–80.0433%12 Apr
mirage10–130.0919%12 Apr
mirage12–12-0.0218%12 Apr
dust26–13-0.0817%12 Apr
ancient6–130.0615%12 Apr
dust216–120.0217%11 Apr
ancient13–80.0817%11 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0131%10 Apr
dust213–160.0321%5 Apr
ancient6–130.0119%5 Apr
mirage7–130.0036%4 Apr
inferno13–70.0816%4 Apr
dust213–3-0.0721%4 Apr
anubis13–10.1322%3 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0425%3 Apr
ancient22–190.0321%1 Apr
mirage13–110.0326%28 Mar
ancient11–130.0423%22 Mar
inferno10–130.0126%22 Mar
mirage4–13-0.1240%15 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0123%10 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0412%10 Mar
inferno13–10-0.0015%8 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0318%8 Mar
mirage11–130.0318%8 Mar
inferno13–60.0136%8 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0052%6 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0118%6 Mar
dust25–13-0.0019%6 Mar
dust213–70.0417%5 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0221%5 Mar
mirage13–100.0117%5 Mar
mirage13–16-0.0411%2 Mar
dust211–13-0.0324%2 Mar
dust215–150.0019%2 Mar
inferno13–50.0226%28 Feb
dust213–4-0.0216%28 Feb
dust214–16-0.0231%28 Feb
mirage13–110.0229%28 Feb
ancient13–20.0835%25 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0226%25 Feb
mirage13–110.0314%17 Feb
dust27–13-0.0224%15 Feb
dust216–140.0819%9 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0418%9 Feb
mirage13–70.0415%8 Feb
overpass13–70.0019%8 Feb
dust213–30.0338%8 Feb
inferno6–13-0.0531%8 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0123%6 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0042%6 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →