ceeeeet — CS2 Stats

76561198134615227[U:1:174349499]✓ No bans

2,110Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,385Pink band · top ~7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4783 of 12791 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGceeeeetFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER21,385 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning54
Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53416Last 10053%Win rateLWLWLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.5
Aggression8.4
Utility7.5
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels4.7
Clutch7.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerHigh utility contributionReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.4
Utility7.5
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact4.4

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time547ms+7ms
first ⅓ avg 540ms → last ⅓ avg 547ms
Headshot accuracy23.5%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 24.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — ancient 13–6
131Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 83% over 6mirageWeakest map · 40% over 25
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC25101540%0.01
dust2B189950%0.03
infernoB168850%0.02
ancientA159660%0.06
cacheB105550%0.02
nukeS107370%0.04
anubisS65183%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

839Matches
54%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
90.3ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

55%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1173%1.3818.8
Dust21155%1.4318.4
Cache560%1.2723.6
Anubis425%0.8611.8
Inferno425%0.8912.0
Nuke250%1.3614.0
Ancient20%1.1020.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.3%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
86.5%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
540msReaction time
36.9%T opening success
60.4%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
10.7%Flash assists
12.78HE damage / grenade
15.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.8553% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno2–13-0.0214%25 Aug
cache13–80.0233%18 Aug
dust27–130.0630%13 Aug
dust213–80.1431%9 Aug
dust28–13-0.0126%9 Aug
nuke4–130.0121%9 Aug
mirage13–100.0229%9 Aug
dust213–90.0716%9 Aug
dust213–90.0821%8 Aug
cache10–130.0221%4 Aug
nuke13–40.0640%3 Aug
dust213–160.0021%1 Aug
dust213–50.0419%1 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0216%1 Aug
ancient16–130.0720%31 Jul
inferno7–130.0117%31 Jul
inferno13–70.0427%31 Jul
inferno13–100.0721%28 Jul
ancient11–130.0722%28 Jul
inferno2–90.0024%26 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0420%26 Jul
anubis16–140.0929%25 Jul
mirage13–100.0127%25 Jul
inferno8–130.0122%25 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0416%25 Jul
cache14–16-0.0121%24 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0030%24 Jul
cache11–13-0.0025%23 Jul
mirage15–150.0419%23 Jul
ancient13–90.0621%19 Jul
mirage13–10.0417%19 Jul
nuke13–60.0429%19 Jul
inferno13–60.0127%16 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0218%16 Jul
cache13–80.0214%12 Jul
inferno5–130.0215%12 Jul
nuke13–40.1324%12 Jul
dust211–13-0.0415%10 Jul
ancient11–130.0828%10 Jul
ancient13–70.0625%9 Jul
dust26–13-0.0138%9 Jul
dust213–30.0518%9 Jul
dust213–70.0538%3 Jul
nuke13–90.0118%2 Jul
ancient13–10.0519%2 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0113%2 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0023%2 Jul
anubis13–50.0824%29 Jun
ancient13–100.0419%29 Jun
mirage13–110.0823%29 Jun
mirage10–130.0116%27 Jun
nuke14–16-0.0327%27 Jun
ancient16–12-0.069%23 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0516%23 Jun
nuke13–40.1326%22 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0422%22 Jun
ancient13–60.2116%21 Jun
anubis15–150.0120%18 Jun
mirage4–130.0424%18 Jun
ancient2–13-0.0126%18 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0618%17 Jun
mirage15–150.0213%14 Jun
mirage8–130.0125%11 Jun
anubis13–60.0324%11 Jun
mirage1–13-0.1316%11 Jun
ancient13–60.1129%11 Jun
dust29–130.0233%11 Jun
inferno13–70.0120%8 Jun
ancient13–50.1521%8 Jun
dust213–80.0427%7 Jun
ancient8–130.1017%7 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0113%7 Jun
dust213–40.0121%3 Jun
inferno13–110.0233%1 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0124%1 Jun
anubis13–80.1020%1 Jun
nuke13–100.0520%31 May
dust213–110.0112%30 May
mirage4–130.0625%30 May
dust25–130.0133%30 May
mirage13–8-0.0221%25 May
inferno13–10.0215%25 May
inferno10–13-0.0228%24 May
mirage13–60.0629%23 May
cache13–40.0432%22 May
mirage15–15-0.0225%20 May
anubis16–14-0.0020%20 May
ancient5–13-0.0322%20 May
mirage13–50.1327%17 May
dust22–13-0.0424%17 May
dust210–13-0.0130%17 May
mirage13–110.0431%17 May
nuke13–20.0427%15 May
mirage13–30.1133%15 May
cache13–100.0220%11 May
cache12–12-0.0120%10 May
cache13–10.0328%10 May
inferno13–80.1525%8 May
mirage8–130.0228%8 May
cache4–130.0520%3 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →