peralta — CS2 Stats

76561198129034377[U:1:168768649]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,106Tracked matches25%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating27,834Top 5% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#530 of 22129 tracked

WingmanMaster Guardian I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92

Positioning57

Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD37–58–5Last 10037%Win rateLLLLWLLLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.2

Aggression7.7

Utility6.0

Positioning5.7

Opening Duels3.3

Clutch6.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2

Positioning5.7

Utility6.0

Mechanics8.3

Opening Duels3.3

Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time542ms−36ms

first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 542ms

Headshot accuracy25.8%+4.5%

first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 25.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — cache 13–2

13–1Biggest win — dust2

4Longest win streak

L4Current streak

3–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

4Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 7infernoWeakest map · 21% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	34	12–22	35%	0.01
mirage	B	24	11–13	46%	0.03
inferno	D	14	3–11	21%	0.01
cache	D	8	2–6	25%	0.02
nuke	S	7	5–2	71%	0.03
ancient	D	6	2–4	33%	0.00
anubis	C	5	2–3	40%	0.01
office	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

618Matches

55%Win rate

1.50Avg K/D

101.8ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

52%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	33	48%	1.51	20.3
Dust2	29	62%	1.58	22.6
Anubis	15	53%	1.52	21.0
Ancient	7	86%	1.45	23.1
Nuke	6	67%	1.84	25.3
Inferno	6	67%	1.32	20.0
Cache	3	0%	1.10	18.3
Overpass	2	50%	1.14	25.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.2%Headshot accuracy

41.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

43.0%Spray accuracy

87.2%Counter-strafing

10.2°Preaim

521msReaction time

34.8%T opening success

51.7%CT opening success

0.61Enemies flashed / flash

9.7%Flash assists

12.66HE damage / grenade

11.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.8418% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	1–2	-0.00	100%	27 Aug →
office	6–13	0.01	30%	27 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.05	39%	27 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.00	18%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.02	23%	26 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.04	27%	26 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.02	29%	26 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	25%	25 Aug →
inferno	12–12	0.05	29%	25 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.01	27%	25 Aug →
dust2	0–6	-0.05	14%	25 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.12	22%	24 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.01	20%	24 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.04	14%	24 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.14	24%	23 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.05	30%	23 Aug →
mirage	4–4	0.06	17%	22 Aug →
mirage	9–0	0.03	23%	22 Aug →
inferno	12–2	0.04	13%	22 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.04	23%	22 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.04	23%	22 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.01	24%	22 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.00	30%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–3	-0.02	16%	22 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.06	23%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.05	17%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.09	30%	21 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.01	24%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.10	28%	19 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.04	13%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–5	-0.01	19%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.11	27%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	30%	19 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.15	28%	19 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.06	28%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.03	20%	19 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.05	12%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.02	9%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	27%	18 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.07	19%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.10	26%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.06	19%	18 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.01	26%	18 Aug →
vertigo	9–13	-0.03	36%	17 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.03	24%	17 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.03	27%	17 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.00	27%	17 Aug →
anubis	3–0	-0.05	0%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.09	22%	17 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.00	40%	17 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.05	38%	16 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.05	23%	16 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.02	23%	16 Aug →
inferno	16–14	0.04	26%	16 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.06	20%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.02	38%	15 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.02	29%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.02	23%	15 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.01	29%	15 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.00	39%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.04	22%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.03	33%	14 Aug →
cache	16–13	0.04	18%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.10	31%	14 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	26%	14 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.05	22%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.11	35%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–1	0.10	23%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.13	16%	11 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.07	14%	10 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.06	24%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.12	14%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.03	29%	9 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.04	25%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.03	20%	9 Aug →
dust2	1–4	-0.05	0%	9 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	18%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.05	27%	9 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	33%	8 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.04	22%	8 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.03	15%	8 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.02	17%	8 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.04	21%	8 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.01	23%	8 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.04	11%	8 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.02	29%	7 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.03	19%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.01	33%	7 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	19%	7 Aug →
anubis	1–13	0.03	24%	7 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.03	26%	7 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	19%	7 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.06	19%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	37%	7 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.01	15%	7 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.04	9%	7 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.05	39%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.02	21%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	22%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.04	23%	5 Aug →