JakeDaley — CS2 Stats

76561198127529283[U:1:167263555]✓ No bans

1,704Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating20,125Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#20367 of 55315 tracked

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70

Positioning40

Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–50–2Last 10048%Win rateLWLLWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.0

Aggression5.2

Utility5.3

Positioning4.0

Opening Duels0.6

Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 581ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0

Positioning4.0

Utility5.3

Mechanics6.4

Opening Duels1.9

Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time576ms−49ms

first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms

Headshot accuracy19.8%+2.7%

first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — dust2 13–6

13–2Biggest win — ancient

4Longest win streak

9–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 65% over 23cacheWeakest map · 14% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	27	15–12	56%	-0.00
inferno	S	23	15–8	65%	-0.00
ancient	B	17	9–8	53%	0.00
cache	D	14	2–12	14%	-0.01
nuke	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.02
anubis	D	5	1–4	20%	-0.02
dust2	—	3	2–1	67%	0.05
vertigo	—	3	0–3	0%	0.01
overpass	—	2	2–0	100%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

655Matches

52%Win rate

1.10Avg K/D

72.8ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

26%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	111	48%	1.01	14.6
Inferno	68	49%	1.02	14.0
Vertigo	29	66%	1.11	15.3
Dust2	28	50%	1.05	15.8
Ancient	26	46%	0.86	13.8
Nuke	25	64%	1.10	16.7
Train	19	63%	1.15	14.6
Anubis	12	33%	1.23	14.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy

34.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.0%Spray accuracy

79.0%Counter-strafing

10.2°Preaim

581msReaction time

19.5%T opening success

45.2%CT opening success

0.46Enemies flashed / flash

4.1%Flash assists

10.22HE damage / grenade

10.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4598 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 19.548% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	6–13	-0.04	20%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.01	29%	23 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	28%	20 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.04	26%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.02	14%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.01	16%	18 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.01	21%	18 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.01	13%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.04	16%	30 Jul →
inferno	14–16	0.06	14%	27 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.08	18%	27 Jul →
cache	0–13	-0.07	0%	25 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.01	23%	25 Jul →
inferno	5–13	0.02	32%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.05	15%	24 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.02	26%	24 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.02	20%	24 Jul →
ancient	3–13	-0.03	32%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.02	13%	24 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.07	21%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	33%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.10	25%	24 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.00	17%	23 Jul →
cache	16–12	0.01	26%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.03	10%	23 Jul →
cache	5–7	0.06	38%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.04	18%	22 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.04	20%	22 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.08	18%	22 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.09	9%	22 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.02	14%	21 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.00	10%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.00	17%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.03	25%	21 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.00	11%	21 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.01	35%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	15%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.01	19%	19 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	23%	18 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.04	18%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.08	18%	17 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.01	33%	16 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	12%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	19%	15 Jul →
nuke	0–9	-0.15	0%	15 Jul →
cache	4–13	0.03	26%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.01	14%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.01	11%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.03	13%	14 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	10%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.00	16%	13 Jul →
mirage	7–2	0.06	30%	13 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.01	19%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.03	20%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–5	-0.06	0%	13 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.03	30%	13 Jul →
ancient	16–14	0.02	13%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.02	11%	11 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.05	14%	11 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	20%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.05	11%	11 Jul →
anubis	16–14	0.09	14%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	19%	10 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.01	17%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.08	16%	10 Jul →
inferno	14–16	-0.04	14%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.02	26%	10 Jul →
inferno	7–0	-0.04	0%	10 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.01	3%	10 Jul →
nuke	2–13	0.01	26%	10 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.00	20%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.04	11%	10 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	21%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	12%	9 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.02	12%	9 Jul →
cache	7–12	-0.05	38%	8 Jul →
overpass	13–6	-0.02	10%	8 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.05	24%	6 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.00	15%	6 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.03	18%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.06	14%	3 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.07	11%	3 Jul →
ancient	13–4	-0.00	26%	3 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.02	23%	3 Jul →
ancient	16–12	-0.01	12%	3 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.03	27%	3 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	8%	3 Jul →
mirage	8–0	0.05	47%	3 Jul →
overpass	13–4	0.06	15%	2 Jul →
inferno	13–3	-0.04	25%	2 Jul →
ancient	5–13	0.01	12%	2 Jul →
vertigo	7–9	-0.02	10%	2 Jul →
vertigo	7–9	0.07	21%	2 Jul →
inferno	9–5	0.03	24%	2 Jul →
nuke	9–6	0.03	14%	2 Jul →
inferno	5–9	-0.09	0%	2 Jul →
vertigo	7–9	-0.03	20%	2 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	25%	1 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	15%	1 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.01	5%	30 Jun →