Tremble

Tremble — CS2 Stats

76561198124928024[U:1:164662296]Steam profile ↗

950Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,269Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3377 of 17154 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTrembleFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,269 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning58
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52444Last 10052%Win rateWWWLLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.0
Aggression6.0
Utility6.5
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.0

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 600ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.8
Utility6.5
Mechanics9.2
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time613ms+39ms
first ⅓ avg 575ms → last ⅓ avg 613ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — cache 13–0
130Biggest win — cache
5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
1111In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 10anubisWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC27121544%0.01
ancientB158753%0.00
infernoS139469%0.01
anubisC135838%-0.01
nukeS108280%0.01
cacheA95456%0.02
dust2C73443%-0.03
overpassC52340%-0.01
warden1010%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

842Matches
53%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
19Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage617%0.7511.8
Anubis560%0.9212.4
Ancient333%0.9413.3
Vertigo333%1.0116.0
Inferno250%0.8412.5
Overpass20%1.0213.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.3%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.3%Spray accuracy
91.6%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
600msReaction time
30.3%T opening success
45.6%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
8.80HE damage / grenade
8.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.2543% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno12–90.0215%1 Aug
mirage13–60.1020%1 Aug
ancient13–60.0418%29 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0118%29 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0113%28 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0821%28 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0423%27 Jul
dust213–30.0621%27 Jul
cache4–13-0.0436%27 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0517%26 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0218%26 Jul
inferno13–50.119%26 Jul
anubis13–40.0230%26 Jul
mirage0–13-0.030%24 Jul
cache13–80.0722%24 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0218%24 Jul
cache13–00.1823%20 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0325%20 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0222%20 Jul
ancient13–50.0424%20 Jul
mirage13–110.0214%19 Jul
cache2–13-0.0442%13 Jul
cache15–15-0.0212%12 Jul
mirage11–130.0212%12 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0119%11 Jul
mirage13–10.0718%10 Jul
ancient13–70.0419%10 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0210%9 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0213%9 Jul
cache13–110.0612%9 Jul
cache13–110.0714%8 Jul
warden12–120.0821%8 Jul
cache13–4-0.0524%8 Jul
mirage4–130.0427%4 Jul
inferno16–130.0816%4 Jul
ancient7–130.0419%4 Jul
mirage13–110.0018%4 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0119%4 Jul
anubis7–4-0.056%4 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0113%30 Jun
dust22–4-0.1225%30 Jun
overpass9–130.0215%29 Jun
anubis9–130.0317%28 Jun
inferno13–160.0321%28 Jun
nuke13–80.0710%25 Jun
ancient13–60.1035%25 Jun
inferno16–140.0222%25 Jun
inferno13–50.0726%23 Jun
ancient13–16-0.0221%22 Jun
dust210–13-0.0316%18 Jun
ancient16–12-0.0414%18 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0121%16 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0911%15 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0713%15 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0023%14 Jun
ancient1–6-0.110%31 May
mirage5–13-0.0224%31 May
overpass7–13-0.0119%30 May
nuke6–13-0.0611%30 May
inferno13–50.0328%30 May
nuke11–13-0.0313%29 May
mirage11–130.0218%28 May
nuke13–70.0823%27 May
dust24–13-0.0717%26 May
inferno13–9-0.0018%26 May
mirage13–110.0348%25 May
anubis4–13-0.0117%25 May
anubis7–13-0.0019%21 May
nuke13–70.0223%19 May
nuke13–7-0.0710%16 May
nuke13–70.0322%16 May
ancient13–7-0.0218%16 May
mirage8–130.0412%13 May
mirage6–13-0.0018%12 May
mirage13–11-0.0119%12 May
inferno13–100.0115%11 May
dust213–10.0124%11 May
ancient13–10.0536%11 May
overpass13–90.0212%10 May
anubis7–13-0.0325%10 May
inferno6–2-0.088%9 May
nuke13–9-0.048%9 May
mirage13–90.0410%5 May
anubis10–13-0.0321%5 May
inferno7–13-0.066%3 May
cache1–8-0.065%3 May
mirage10–130.0035%3 May
overpass4–13-0.077%3 May
dust215–15-0.0417%3 May
anubis13–110.017%30 Apr
mirage13–110.0327%28 Apr
nuke13–110.0411%28 Apr
ancient13–20.0723%27 Apr
anubis8–130.0513%27 Apr
anubis13–80.0113%27 Apr
mirage11–130.0332%26 Apr
overpass13–20.0216%26 Apr
dust213–11-0.0214%26 Apr
nuke13–50.0812%25 Apr
mirage13–100.0213%25 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →