eL Spaniard

eL Spaniard — CS2 Stats

76561198123503536[U:1:163237808]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,175Tracked matches57%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating20,304Pink band · top ~8.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8579 of 20814 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,376 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGeL SpaniardFACEITLevel 6 · 1,376 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER20,304 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim45
Positioning37
Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54424Last 10054%Win rateWLWLWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim4.5
Aggression4.7
Utility7.3
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 662ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.5
Positioning3.7
Utility7.3
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact7.4

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time670ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 671ms → last ⅓ avg 670ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — ancient 13–3
130Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
94In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 78% over 9nukeWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB30151550%0.01
ancientS2114767%-0.00
dust2B1991047%-0.01
infernoS97278%0.02
cacheB84450%-0.02
nukeC83538%0.02
anubis31233%-0.00
overpass21150%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,111Matches
49%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
77.1ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage32151%1.0915.1
Dust218253%1.0715.6
Ancient16240%0.9313.2
Inferno10041%0.9314.5
Vertigo6466%1.1615.3
Anubis6242%0.8813.6
Nuke3845%1.0013.1
Train838%1.0313.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
30.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.5%Spray accuracy
74.7%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
662msReaction time
20.7%T opening success
46.9%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
11.07HE damage / grenade
19.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.6871% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–30.0116%28 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0618%28 Aug
cache13–80.0316%28 Aug
nuke5–130.0230%26 Aug
mirage13–50.0310%24 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0810%23 Aug
dust28–13-0.0319%23 Aug
dust213–7-0.0427%18 Aug
mirage13–10.0129%16 Aug
cache7–13-0.0416%12 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0617%11 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0018%9 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0521%8 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0216%8 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0417%8 Aug
mirage13–20.1216%2 Aug
ancient13–00.1017%2 Aug
mirage13–110.0617%2 Aug
mirage3–130.0413%2 Aug
mirage13–60.0513%2 Aug
ancient16–140.0421%1 Aug
cache13–110.0226%1 Aug
inferno13–20.0623%1 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0319%27 Jul
ancient13–30.1637%27 Jul
cache13–6-0.0323%27 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0130%26 Jul
inferno13–80.0220%26 Jul
cache13–110.0110%25 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0816%24 Jul
ancient3–13-0.1038%24 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0216%24 Jul
mirage13–70.1226%24 Jul
dust210–13-0.0115%23 Jul
inferno16–13-0.0212%23 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0022%22 Jul
nuke9–130.0222%22 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0333%22 Jul
mirage13–20.0130%22 Jul
ancient13–50.0211%22 Jul
mirage16–140.0214%20 Jul
ancient13–7-0.027%20 Jul
dust213–40.028%20 Jul
dust211–130.0122%20 Jul
dust20–13-0.050%19 Jul
ancient13–60.0220%19 Jul
anubis13–90.0416%19 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0118%18 Jul
cache11–13-0.0319%18 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0423%18 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0215%18 Jul
dust213–2-0.0423%17 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0122%17 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0917%17 Jul
nuke13–70.0926%17 Jul
dust213–6-0.0123%17 Jul
ancient13–2-0.0147%16 Jul
cache5–13-0.1124%16 Jul
cache8–13-0.0524%16 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0216%13 Jul
ancient13–60.029%12 Jul
dust29–13-0.0212%12 Jul
dust21–13-0.0911%9 Jul
mirage10–130.0315%6 Jul
dust213–7-0.0513%5 Jul
inferno13–90.0634%1 Jul
nuke13–100.0324%27 Jun
mirage11–130.0020%25 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0212%20 Jun
ancient13–7-0.018%19 Jun
inferno6–130.0325%18 Jun
mirage13–90.0319%18 Jun
anubis9–130.0124%14 Jun
inferno13–60.0331%14 Jun
ancient15–15-0.0310%12 Jun
dust210–130.0123%12 Jun
mirage13–30.0113%12 Jun
overpass13–40.0114%11 Jun
dust29–13-0.0521%10 Jun
dust213–110.0224%6 Jun
dust213–11-0.0221%5 Jun
mirage13–60.0128%3 Jun
dust215–150.0621%2 Jun
dust213–160.0014%30 May
ancient13–100.0736%19 May
inferno13–5-0.0314%8 May
mirage2–13-0.1117%6 May
nuke5–130.0530%30 Apr
mirage9–130.0727%27 Apr
ancient19–16-0.0029%27 Apr
inferno13–50.0313%26 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0020%25 Apr
mirage16–130.0614%23 Apr
dust213–30.0124%23 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0019%22 Apr
mirage13–160.0419%21 Apr
nuke13–7-0.0412%19 Apr
anubis6–13-0.0615%19 Apr
overpass9–13-0.0123%18 Apr
ancient13–100.0223%16 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →