chicken rouge — CS2 Stats

76561198123329057[U:1:163063329]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,939Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.6 SolidAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83

Positioning66

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–42–7Last 10051%Win rateLWLWWWWLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.3

Aggression10.0

Utility4.9

Positioning6.6

Opening Duels5.7

Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ZywOo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 44% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 619ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3

Positioning6.6

Utility4.9

Mechanics6.4

Opening Duels5.7

Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time617ms+4ms

first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 617ms

Headshot accuracy33.0%+2.3%

first ⅓ avg 30.7% → last ⅓ avg 33.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — nuke 13–6

13–1Biggest win — nuke

4Longest win streak

12–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 60% over 20overpassWeakest map · 25% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	26	14–12	54%	0.01
mirage	A	20	12–8	60%	0.02
nuke	A	15	9–6	60%	0.05
ancient	B	13	7–6	54%	0.02
inferno	B	11	5–6	45%	0.00
overpass	D	8	2–6	25%	0.01
anubis	—	4	2–2	50%	0.03
cache	—	1	0–1	0%	0.05
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,205Matches

51%Win rate

1.15Avg K/D

87.4ADR

51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	143	53%	1.20	17.8
Dust2	121	50%	1.21	18.4
Anubis	109	48%	1.22	18.0
Ancient	88	50%	1.37	18.6
Vertigo	52	50%	1.36	19.3
Inferno	41	46%	1.27	18.1
Nuke	23	35%	1.17	17.8
Overpass	11	55%	1.46	17.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

32.6%Headshot accuracy

35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.9%Spray accuracy

78.8%Counter-strafing

9.8°Preaim

619msReaction time

44.3%T opening success

61.6%CT opening success

0.49Enemies flashed / flash

9.7%Flash assists

9.97HE damage / grenade

9.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4888 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	7–13	0.03	29%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.00	44%	25 Aug →
nuke	3–13	0.02	21%	10 Jun →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	39%	10 Jun →
inferno	13–10	-0.02	28%	7 Jun →
ancient	13–9	0.06	28%	7 Jun →
ancient	13–4	0.15	33%	7 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.05	33%	6 Jun →
nuke	12–12	0.03	32%	4 Jun →
overpass	7–13	0.09	19%	3 Jun →
anubis	12–12	-0.02	24%	2 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.08	33%	30 May →
dust2	13–6	0.05	30%	30 May →
dust2	13–16	-0.03	26%	28 May →
dust2	13–5	0.07	32%	27 May →
nuke	13–7	0.07	56%	16 May →
dust2	12–12	0.00	32%	12 May →
cache	11–13	0.05	39%	30 Apr →
mirage	8–10	0.04	40%	22 Apr →
mirage	13–10	0.00	32%	16 Apr →
mirage	6–13	0.02	32%	11 Apr →
mirage	3–13	-0.06	29%	6 Apr →
dust2	9–13	0.04	47%	1 Apr →
dust2	13–16	0.06	38%	31 Mar →
nuke	13–11	0.04	38%	31 Mar →
ancient	8–13	-0.02	29%	10 Mar →
nuke	13–4	0.14	28%	10 Mar →
anubis	13–8	0.10	35%	3 Mar →
anubis	13–8	0.03	23%	1 Mar →
mirage	10–13	0.05	26%	1 Mar →
inferno	3–13	0.06	38%	1 Mar →
dust2	12–12	0.03	37%	28 Feb →
mirage	12–12	0.07	41%	28 Feb →
nuke	15–15	-0.01	36%	24 Feb →
nuke	10–13	0.02	26%	23 Feb →
inferno	9–13	0.07	46%	23 Feb →
mirage	13–4	0.08	24%	23 Feb →
nuke	10–13	0.05	39%	22 Feb →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	43%	19 Feb →
inferno	13–6	0.01	17%	16 Feb →
vertigo	3–13	-0.03	71%	15 Feb →
anubis	10–13	0.02	40%	15 Feb →
poseidon	4–9	-0.16	26%	25 Jan →
nuke	13–1	0.10	38%	18 Jan →
mirage	16–13	0.02	21%	18 Jan →
dust2	13–5	0.06	41%	18 Jan →
mirage	13–6	-0.03	18%	18 Jan →
dust2	6–13	-0.06	9%	18 Jan →
dust2	13–4	0.04	14%	18 Jan →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	39%	18 Jan →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	17%	18 Jan →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	22%	18 Jan →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	36%	18 Jan →
mirage	13–5	0.03	27%	18 Jan →
dust2	13–10	-0.03	30%	18 Jan →
ancient	13–5	-0.02	22%	18 Jan →
overpass	10–13	-0.03	22%	18 Jan →
nuke	7–13	-0.06	40%	18 Jan →
inferno	13–11	-0.07	26%	18 Jan →
mirage	13–3	0.04	18%	18 Jan →
ancient	3–13	0.01	50%	18 Jan →
inferno	11–13	-0.03	14%	18 Jan →
inferno	9–13	-0.07	36%	17 Jan →
dust2	13–6	0.01	36%	17 Jan →
inferno	0–8	-0.08	17%	17 Jan →
dust2	16–14	0.07	49%	17 Jan →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	40%	17 Jan →
dust2	13–6	0.02	27%	17 Jan →
overpass	9–13	-0.07	14%	17 Jan →
ancient	13–11	0.09	31%	14 Jan →
dust2	13–9	-0.05	23%	14 Jan →
mirage	7–1	0.01	31%	14 Jan →
ancient	2–6	-0.05	22%	14 Jan →
dust2	13–2	-0.01	20%	14 Jan →
nuke	16–14	0.05	26%	13 Jan →
overpass	10–13	-0.02	41%	13 Jan →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	44%	13 Jan →
nuke	13–6	0.15	33%	13 Jan →
ancient	11–13	0.07	33%	13 Jan →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	45%	13 Jan →
overpass	16–14	0.02	24%	7 Jan →
dust2	13–8	-0.04	11%	7 Jan →
mirage	13–5	0.10	31%	7 Jan →
dust2	15–15	0.04	19%	6 Jan →
nuke	13–5	0.06	33%	5 Jan →
ancient	13–11	0.02	55%	5 Jan →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	40%	5 Jan →
nuke	13–4	0.02	16%	5 Jan →
mirage	11–13	-0.06	14%	5 Jan →
ancient	13–6	0.04	25%	5 Jan →
overpass	3–13	-0.03	44%	3 Jan →
mirage	13–4	0.06	50%	3 Jan →
overpass	13–11	0.06	30%	3 Jan →
ancient	16–13	-0.04	25%	31 Dec →
overpass	10–13	0.06	31%	30 Dec →
dust2	7–13	0.04	50%	30 Dec →
inferno	13–2	0.10	38%	30 Dec →
ancient	11–13	-0.05	22%	30 Dec →
dust2	16–12	0.07	34%	29 Dec →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	33%	29 Dec →