Stegzera

Stegzera — CS2 Stats

GB76561198123229726[U:1:162963998]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,025Tracked matches50%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,523 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGStegzeraFACEITLevel 7 · 1,523 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning42
Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51463Last 10051%Win rateLLLWLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.5
Aggression3.0
Utility3.1
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.6
Clutch7.4

Strong CT-side openerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 657ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning4.2
Utility3.1
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time651ms+27ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 651ms
Headshot accuracy20.6%+3.7%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — nuke 13–7
131Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 73% over 15ancientWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB178947%0.02
cacheS1511473%0.01
mirageA148657%0.01
dust2C125742%0.00
ancientD113827%-0.01
infernoA106460%0.01
anubisB84450%0.04
overpassC52340%-0.00
office440100%-0.04
shelter1010%0.02
fachwerk1010%-0.03
alpine1010%0.05
vertigo1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

34Matches
62%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
83.7ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

57%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage850%1.0216.0
Inferno367%1.1219.3
Dust23100%1.2818.0
Cache3100%0.9616.0
Anubis367%0.8516.3
Ancient2100%1.5017.5
Overpass250%0.709.0
Nuke250%1.4211.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.7%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
79.4%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
657msReaction time
24.0%T opening success
41.1%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
2.26HE damage / grenade
7.58Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.9638% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno3–13-0.0023%12 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0015%3 Aug
cache8–13-0.0317%3 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0321%16 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0126%16 Jul
dust23–13-0.0627%12 Jul
cache13–7-0.0314%12 Jul
shelter3–70.0232%11 Jul
fachwerk1–13-0.0315%11 Jul
office13–100.0229%11 Jul
dust211–130.0513%11 Jul
office13–10-0.140%11 Jul
office13–110.0139%11 Jul
nuke13–110.0827%10 Jul
cache13–11-0.0312%10 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0511%10 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0917%10 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0831%9 Jul
alpine3–80.0523%8 Jul
cache13–110.0426%7 Jul
office13–6-0.0520%4 Jul
cache13–5-0.0126%4 Jul
cache13–100.0313%4 Jul
cache2–13-0.0335%3 Jul
inferno13–8-0.009%2 Jul
anubis13–80.0725%2 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0717%29 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0315%29 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0017%27 Jun
dust213–9-0.0222%23 Jun
nuke11–130.0122%12 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0315%10 Jun
inferno13–30.1229%10 Jun
dust210–13-0.0320%17 May
ancient5–13-0.0713%15 May
ancient13–16-0.0417%10 May
cache13–80.0017%10 May
cache13–30.067%9 May
cache13–100.0127%9 May
cache10–130.0219%9 May
cache13–70.025%7 May
mirage13–20.1631%1 May
cache7–13-0.0620%1 May
cache13–80.0523%1 May
cache13–90.0710%29 Apr
mirage13–100.0417%25 Apr
anubis12–16-0.0116%25 Apr
ancient13–50.0811%16 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0116%16 Apr
ancient8–13-0.058%16 Apr
ancient13–90.057%12 Apr
inferno8–13-0.037%10 Apr
overpass13–50.0425%10 Apr
anubis4–60.0720%8 Apr
nuke3–13-0.0319%8 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0115%3 Apr
anubis13–100.0610%28 Mar
ancient13–9-0.0011%28 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0113%27 Mar
dust212–120.0113%24 Mar
nuke13–110.039%21 Mar
overpass7–13-0.0224%21 Mar
nuke13–70.1715%17 Mar
inferno13–80.0410%17 Mar
mirage13–110.0226%5 Mar
inferno13–40.1311%5 Mar
anubis13–40.0721%4 Mar
mirage7–130.0421%4 Mar
inferno3–13-0.0021%4 Mar
mirage13–3-0.0322%4 Mar
vertigo7–130.0317%20 Feb
dust216–12-0.0110%20 Feb
nuke13–90.0218%18 Feb
ancient15–15-0.008%18 Feb
mirage13–90.0722%17 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0316%12 Feb
nuke12–16-0.057%12 Feb
nuke7–130.0022%11 Feb
dust213–16-0.0114%11 Feb
dust213–80.0324%11 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0412%10 Feb
dust26–13-0.075%10 Feb
mirage13–50.017%31 Jan
nuke7–130.0321%31 Jan
nuke13–110.0827%30 Jan
dust25–130.0226%30 Jan
overpass13–40.0523%29 Jan
anubis14–160.0117%29 Jan
dust213–10.0824%28 Jan
ancient5–130.036%25 Jan
inferno6–13-0.0414%25 Jan
nuke13–10.1116%25 Jan
overpass15–15-0.0314%24 Jan
mirage13–100.058%24 Jan
overpass14–16-0.0410%23 Jan
anubis13–80.0634%23 Jan
anubis8–13-0.0118%23 Jan
mirage7–130.0315%23 Jan
nuke13–80.0521%23 Jan
dust216–130.0019%22 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →