Cherries — CS2 Stats

76561198121776674[U:1:161510946]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

811Tracked matches68%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.3 SolidAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71

Positioning54

Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51–45–4Last 10051%Win rateWWWWWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.1

Aggression7.0

Utility4.6

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels2.0

Clutch8.0

Strong CT-side openerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 615ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1

Positioning5.4

Utility4.6

Mechanics7.7

Opening Duels2.0

Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time620ms+36ms

first ⅓ avg 584ms → last ⅓ avg 620ms

Headshot accuracy20.4%−1.2%

first ⅓ avg 21.6% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.25Best rating — poseidon 9–5

13–3Biggest win — inferno

8Longest win streak

W8Current streak

6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

3Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 12dust2Weakest map · 35% over 20

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	20	7–13	35%	0.01
mirage	B	18	9–9	50%	-0.01
inferno	A	14	8–6	57%	0.04
cache	S	12	9–3	75%	0.02
vertigo	C	8	3–5	38%	0.03
ancient	A	5	3–2	60%	0.02
overpass	—	4	3–1	75%	0.01
office	—	4	1–3	25%	0.07
anubis	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.01
warden	—	3	2–1	67%	0.05
train	—	2	1–1	50%	0.05
poseidon	—	2	1–1	50%	0.13
nuke	—	2	1–1	50%	0.05
fachwerk	—	1	0–1	0%	0.05
sanctum	—	1	1–0	100%	0.20
alpine	—	1	0–1	0%	0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

32Matches

41%Win rate

0.99Avg K/D

71.3ADR

40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

60%1v1 clutch win

50%1v2 clutch win

4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	6	50%	1.52	16.0
Ancient	4	75%	1.03	13.8
Vertigo	2	50%	0.99	14.0
Dust2	2	0%	0.62	17.0
Overpass	1	100%	1.74	33.0
Anubis	1	0%	1.00	16.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.7%Headshot accuracy

32.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.4%Spray accuracy

84.8%Counter-strafing

10.4°Preaim

615msReaction time

30.2%T opening success

45.7%CT opening success

0.57Enemies flashed / flash

3.8%Flash assists

11.04HE damage / grenade

5.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.2358% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–10	0.02	19%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.02	15%	27 Aug →
mirage	6–3	-0.08	20%	25 Aug →
anubis	16–13	-0.02	18%	25 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.13	12%	25 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.02	12%	23 Aug →
vertigo	13–6	0.05	25%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–5	-0.02	12%	20 Aug →
cache	1–13	-0.03	13%	10 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.09	20%	10 Aug →
fachwerk	11–13	0.05	23%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.02	30%	7 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.13	23%	5 Jul →
train	13–3	0.06	22%	18 Jun →
mirage	3–13	-0.09	28%	18 Jun →
ancient	8–2	-0.05	14%	13 Jun →
vertigo	9–13	0.02	25%	8 Jun →
vertigo	13–11	0.04	28%	8 Jun →
vertigo	12–12	-0.03	33%	7 Jun →
train	12–12	0.05	33%	1 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.03	12%	1 Jun →
poseidon	5–9	0.01	19%	1 Jun →
poseidon	9–5	0.25	18%	20 May →
inferno	7–9	0.00	33%	20 May →
inferno	13–3	0.02	16%	20 May →
dust2	10–13	0.07	23%	19 May →
nuke	5–13	-0.04	9%	19 May →
cache	13–7	0.02	12%	19 May →
cache	1–13	-0.10	17%	14 May →
cache	13–8	0.04	23%	14 May →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	7%	12 May →
mirage	16–12	-0.03	22%	12 May →
cache	13–10	-0.01	38%	11 May →
inferno	6–13	-0.04	2%	11 May →
cache	7–3	0.02	55%	11 May →
dust2	7–13	0.01	31%	11 May →
cache	13–11	0.03	16%	11 May →
cache	7–13	-0.01	23%	10 May →
cache	13–9	0.12	25%	9 May →
dust2	13–6	0.05	34%	20 Apr →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	13%	20 Apr →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	15%	18 Apr →
ancient	13–7	-0.00	13%	18 Apr →
overpass	13–7	0.01	16%	17 Apr →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	23%	16 Apr →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	9%	16 Apr →
mirage	13–6	-0.05	13%	15 Apr →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	14%	14 Apr →
warden	13–11	0.06	20%	14 Apr →
mirage	13–11	0.01	13%	13 Apr →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	18%	12 Apr →
overpass	13–7	0.03	14%	11 Apr →
vertigo	11–13	0.12	30%	9 Apr →
inferno	4–13	0.07	11%	9 Apr →
dust2	4–13	0.10	23%	9 Apr →
inferno	13–9	-0.04	6%	9 Apr →
vertigo	13–9	0.06	19%	7 Apr →
anubis	13–8	-0.02	15%	7 Apr →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	17%	7 Apr →
mirage	13–6	-0.00	13%	7 Apr →
mirage	13–4	0.11	18%	7 Apr →
warden	9–13	0.02	12%	6 Apr →
dust2	2–13	-0.03	20%	6 Apr →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	17%	5 Apr →
anubis	5–13	-0.00	22%	5 Apr →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	13%	4 Apr →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	30%	4 Apr →
office	11–13	0.04	24%	3 Apr →
overpass	13–7	-0.02	16%	3 Apr →
dust2	16–14	-0.10	16%	2 Apr →
mirage	3–13	-0.06	40%	2 Apr →
overpass	10–13	0.03	21%	2 Apr →
dust2	6–2	0.13	15%	2 Apr →
ancient	9–13	0.05	44%	29 Mar →
inferno	6–9	0.07	16%	29 Mar →
sanctum	9–0	0.20	24%	29 Mar →
ancient	13–6	0.04	16%	28 Mar →
mirage	13–8	0.04	15%	28 Mar →
vertigo	4–13	-0.04	15%	27 Mar →
inferno	4–13	-0.00	19%	27 Mar →
alpine	10–13	0.16	9%	27 Mar →
mirage	13–8	0.02	14%	26 Mar →
inferno	13–5	0.09	18%	26 Mar →
dust2	13–10	0.12	38%	26 Mar →
office	7–13	0.00	31%	26 Mar →
dust2	12–12	0.06	15%	23 Mar →
inferno	10–13	0.06	11%	22 Mar →
dust2	7–13	0.00	23%	21 Mar →
inferno	13–5	0.02	24%	21 Mar →
vertigo	12–12	0.05	17%	21 Mar →
warden	13–9	0.07	0%	21 Mar →
nuke	8–1	0.14	17%	21 Mar →
office	10–13	0.07	24%	21 Mar →
inferno	9–5	0.10	30%	21 Mar →
inferno	13–7	0.04	28%	20 Mar →
mirage	6–13	0.00	17%	20 Mar →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	16%	20 Mar →
office	13–6	0.15	56%	20 Mar →
ancient	11–13	0.04	20%	20 Mar →
dust2	13–5	0.03	26%	20 Mar →