.Diabl0- — CS2 Stats

76561198121439939[U:1:161174211]

2,422Tracked matches64%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,188Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6697 of 22229 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG.Diabl0-FACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER22,188 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning52
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52435Last 10052%Win rateWLWWLLLTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.2
Aggression7.2
Utility7.0
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.2
Utility7.0
Mechanics4.1
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact9.8

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time567ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 560ms → last ⅓ avg 567ms
Headshot accuracy24.3%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 21.9% → last ⅓ avg 24.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 13–5
132Biggest win — anubis
8Longest win streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 63% over 8cacheWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B41221954%0.01
anubisB179853%0.01
mirageA116555%0.03
nukeC83538%0.02
infernoA85363%-0.01
cacheD72529%0.02
ancientA53260%0.03
overpass32167%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,443Matches
48%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
83.9ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis475%1.2818.0
Mirage4100%1.3715.8
Ancient40%0.7412.0
Inferno1100%2.0016.0
Dust21100%1.6221.0
Nuke10%0.6511.0
Train1100%1.8027.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.2%Headshot accuracy
31.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.3%Spray accuracy
68.3%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
564msReaction time
32.4%T opening success
49.9%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
11.78HE damage / grenade
11.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.4278% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–70.0918%26 Aug
anubis3–130.0111%26 Aug
dust213–60.0222%26 Aug
mirage16–130.0618%25 Aug
dust25–13-0.0019%25 Aug
dust210–130.0440%25 Aug
dust211–13-0.0335%24 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0235%22 Aug
ancient5–130.0720%22 Aug
dust213–11-0.0127%22 Aug
dust213–30.0236%22 Aug
dust25–13-0.0315%22 Aug
anubis13–100.0531%22 Aug
mirage9–130.0535%22 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0229%20 Aug
inferno13–60.0119%20 Aug
dust28–130.0125%18 Aug
dust215–150.0528%18 Aug
anubis13–50.0715%18 Aug
dust21–13-0.1021%17 Aug
cache13–40.0831%17 Aug
dust213–6-0.0229%17 Aug
dust213–30.1145%16 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0121%16 Aug
dust213–10-0.0116%15 Aug
dust213–70.0518%15 Aug
dust213–100.0312%15 Aug
dust213–40.0730%15 Aug
mirage7–100.0130%15 Aug
mirage13–30.0316%14 Aug
mirage13–40.0712%14 Aug
dust210–130.0626%14 Aug
anubis13–90.0218%12 Aug
dust213–60.0218%12 Aug
ancient14–160.0231%11 Aug
cache8–130.0121%11 Aug
nuke8–130.0431%11 Aug
anubis13–20.0821%11 Aug
nuke0–13-0.0619%10 Aug
dust216–140.0320%10 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0018%10 Aug
anubis13–110.0327%10 Aug
nuke13–20.0430%9 Aug
cache8–130.0114%9 Aug
dust213–8-0.0116%9 Aug
dust213–3-0.0221%9 Aug
cache3–13-0.0129%9 Aug
cache8–13-0.0524%4 Aug
dust212–160.0924%4 Aug
dust210–13-0.0321%4 Aug
anubis15–150.0122%30 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0726%30 Jul
dust213–5-0.0031%30 Jul
cache13–100.0326%11 Jul
cache15–150.0634%11 Jul
dust210–130.0621%5 Jul
ancient13–100.0829%5 Jul
overpass13–8-0.0820%5 Jul
overpass13–100.0615%4 Jul
dust213–50.0118%4 Jul
nuke7–130.0431%4 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0515%3 Jul
dust213–11-0.0024%3 Jul
dust211–13-0.1117%3 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0219%1 Jul
dust213–110.1124%1 Jul
nuke8–130.0527%28 Jun
anubis13–70.0119%27 Jun
dust211–13-0.0627%27 Jun
ancient13–60.029%27 Jun
overpass6–130.0620%27 Jun
anubis16–120.0428%26 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0718%26 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0220%26 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0415%26 Jun
mirage13–60.0318%26 Jun
mirage8–130.0924%26 Jun
dust213–8-0.0115%25 Jun
dust215–150.0419%25 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0315%25 Jun
dust213–70.0629%25 Jun
dust213–8-0.0216%24 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0214%24 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0121%24 Jun
inferno13–4-0.0127%23 Jun
dust213–50.1338%23 Jun
mirage13–20.0920%22 Jun
dust214–160.0017%22 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0019%22 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0319%22 Jun
dust213–80.0630%22 Jun
dust28–130.0242%21 Jun
dust211–13-0.0034%21 Jun
anubis13–40.0621%21 Jun
inferno13–70.0318%21 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0619%20 Jun
dust26–13-0.0628%20 Jun
dust210–13-0.0419%20 Jun
inferno13–80.0625%20 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0422%19 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →