naN

naN — CS2 Stats

US76561198121385531[U:1:161119803]Steam profile ↗

713Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,476Purple band · top ~26.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#23751 of 39881 tracked
WingmanSilver Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnaNPREMIER15,476 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning50
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49465Last 10049%Win rateWWLTLTWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.0
Aggression3.8
Utility6.2
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels0.2
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 637ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning5.0
Utility6.2
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels0.6
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time650ms+18ms
first ⅓ avg 632ms → last ⅓ avg 650ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%+4.1%
first ⅓ avg 14.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — dust2 14–16
132Biggest win — cache
5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 63% over 32anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A32201263%-0.00
ancientC1661038%-0.01
infernoA138562%-0.01
mirageB136746%-0.02
cacheB115645%-0.01
anubisD72529%-0.06
nuke4040%-0.04
debris1010%-0.10
vertigo110100%0.08
italy1010%-0.07
poseidon110100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4Matches
75%Win rate
0.76Avg K/D
66.0ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
100%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2250%0.849.5
Ancient1100%0.7613.0
Mirage1100%0.6312.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
85.0%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
637msReaction time
26.8%T opening success
34.7%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
7.9%Flash assists
11.61HE damage / grenade
8.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.8373% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–5-0.0316%26 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0612%21 Aug
mirage10–130.0412%11 Aug
cache15–15-0.0133%11 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0717%7 Aug
debris8–8-0.1046%7 Aug
dust216–130.0215%7 Aug
ancient5–00.0621%7 Aug
anubis8–13-0.1111%5 Aug
dust28–13-0.0313%5 Aug
dust213–8-0.0017%5 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0210%5 Aug
ancient4–13-0.059%3 Aug
dust28–13-0.0717%2 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0313%2 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0030%2 Aug
cache8–13-0.0223%2 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0711%2 Aug
dust213–5-0.0319%2 Aug
dust213–8-0.0123%2 Aug
dust213–80.0623%1 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0720%1 Aug
mirage9–130.0117%30 Jul
dust213–8-0.0312%30 Jul
ancient13–110.0117%29 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0218%29 Jul
dust213–70.0219%29 Jul
dust27–13-0.0120%29 Jul
dust27–13-0.0511%27 Jul
inferno13–100.0220%27 Jul
cache13–11-0.0232%26 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0223%24 Jul
dust210–130.0224%24 Jul
dust29–13-0.016%24 Jul
ancient13–30.047%23 Jul
cache13–110.0112%23 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0328%23 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0018%22 Jul
mirage16–130.0011%22 Jul
dust216–130.0316%22 Jul
ancient9–130.019%22 Jul
dust213–5-0.0332%22 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0210%21 Jul
dust213–9-0.039%20 Jul
dust213–6-0.0612%20 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0117%20 Jul
dust25–13-0.0411%19 Jul
dust211–13-0.0017%19 Jul
dust213–50.0518%19 Jul
mirage8–13-0.090%18 Jul
cache13–50.002%18 Jul
cache11–130.0318%9 Jul
mirage10–13-0.1127%9 Jul
cache13–20.0225%9 Jul
inferno9–60.0431%9 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0519%8 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0713%8 Jul
vertigo13–20.0824%8 Jul
cache13–4-0.0127%8 Jul
cache8–130.0116%6 Jul
italy12–12-0.0713%6 Jul
cache8–130.0138%6 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0729%5 Jul
nuke10–130.0013%5 Jul
dust213–30.0224%5 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0620%5 Jul
anubis15–15-0.0629%5 Jul
dust213–80.0016%2 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0627%2 Jul
ancient10–13-0.058%1 Jul
dust213–90.0322%1 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0811%1 Jul
mirage13–20.009%1 Jul
dust213–10-0.0416%1 Jul
anubis13–2-0.018%1 Jul
inferno10–130.0316%1 Jul
dust213–50.0424%1 Jul
dust213–90.0620%1 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0216%30 Jun
cache4–13-0.0814%30 Jun
dust213–100.0127%29 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0111%28 Jun
dust23–13-0.0513%28 Jun
mirage16–13-0.0213%25 Jun
ancient5–120.0818%25 Jun
dust26–13-0.0017%25 Jun
ancient7–130.0113%25 Jun
mirage13–60.009%25 Jun
poseidon9–6-0.0315%25 Jun
nuke1–13-0.1013%22 Jun
anubis13–5-0.048%22 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0316%22 Jun
inferno13–110.0711%22 Jun
ancient13–70.0617%22 Jun
dust214–160.1114%21 Jun
mirage9–130.0328%21 Jun
dust211–13-0.0214%21 Jun
anubis9–13-0.089%21 Jun
ancient3–13-0.098%21 Jun
ancient13–90.0112%18 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →