dingus — CS2 Stats

US76561198119506134[U:1:159240406]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,204Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating15,966Purple band · top ~24.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#19569 of 33294 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66

Positioning47

Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–45–6Last 10049%Win rateLLWWLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.07 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6

Aggression4.8

Utility5.5

Positioning4.7

Opening Duels1.3

Clutch4.6

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.82 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 612ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6

Positioning4.7

Utility5.5

Mechanics7.2

Opening Duels2.1

Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time606ms−35ms

first ⅓ avg 641ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms

Headshot accuracy15.1%+2.8%

first ⅓ avg 12.4% → last ⅓ avg 15.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — mirage 13–0

13–0Biggest win — mirage

5Longest win streak

L2Current streak

6–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 58% over 19mirageWeakest map · 37% over 19

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	B	23	11–12	48%	0.01
dust2	A	19	11–8	58%	0.03
mirage	C	19	7–12	37%	0.03
nuke	B	17	8–9	47%	-0.00
ancient	A	12	7–5	58%	-0.00
inferno	—	4	2–2	50%	0.04
anubis	—	3	1–2	33%	0.01
overpass	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

181Matches

54%Win rate

1.20Avg K/D

84.5ADR

40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	45	58%	1.30	17.9
Dust2	27	48%	1.17	16.5
Nuke	26	65%	1.18	18.5
Ancient	24	62%	1.20	15.5
Vertigo	19	53%	1.37	17.5
Anubis	14	43%	1.35	16.7
Cache	14	50%	0.83	12.6
Inferno	10	40%	1.06	16.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.8%Headshot accuracy

37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.4%Spray accuracy

82.4%Counter-strafing

11.6°Preaim

612msReaction time

24.0%T opening success

46.8%CT opening success

0.82Enemies flashed / flash

6.4%Flash assists

11.57HE damage / grenade

7.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.7638% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 23.9801% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	11–13	0.08	29%	28 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	19%	26 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.06	12%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–0	0.16	22%	25 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.05	20%	25 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.03	13%	25 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.08	11%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.03	5%	24 Aug →
nuke	4–13	0.03	18%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–16	0.12	15%	22 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.02	19%	22 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.01	13%	22 Aug →
nuke	2–13	-0.07	12%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–4	-0.03	7%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–1	0.02	12%	15 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.02	17%	14 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.01	19%	14 Aug →
nuke	12–12	-0.05	14%	14 Aug →
ancient	1–13	-0.01	12%	14 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.09	5%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–16	0.02	11%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.02	20%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.03	19%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.07	13%	9 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	5%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.04	10%	8 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.03	20%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.02	24%	7 Aug →
cache	13–1	0.07	22%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–4	-0.02	12%	7 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.06	13%	5 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.01	15%	5 Aug →
cache	12–16	-0.01	25%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.07	22%	3 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.01	20%	3 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.02	16%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.01	15%	30 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.01	13%	30 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.04	20%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–5	-0.02	22%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.12	14%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–0	-0.00	7%	27 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.03	23%	27 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.08	24%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.04	8%	26 Jul →
cache	16–14	0.02	13%	26 Jul →
cache	12–16	0.03	14%	26 Jul →
anubis	3–13	-0.06	8%	24 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.01	15%	23 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.02	19%	22 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.10	13%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.00	6%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–7	-0.08	19%	21 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.06	11%	21 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.04	18%	20 Jul →
cache	15–15	-0.01	18%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–0	0.05	22%	20 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.10	19%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.04	15%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.07	17%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.08	21%	19 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.03	19%	19 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.04	12%	19 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.06	13%	18 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.03	19%	18 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.04	12%	18 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.02	9%	18 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	9%	12 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.10	8%	16 May →
cache	9–13	0.02	14%	29 Apr →
dust2	13–8	0.07	11%	30 Jan →
mirage	1–5	-0.01	9%	30 Jan →
dust2	13–10	0.02	6%	30 Jan →
overpass	15–15	-0.01	9%	29 Jan →
ancient	13–6	0.07	11%	29 Jan →
mirage	8–13	0.02	8%	29 Jan →
nuke	11–13	0.04	11%	29 Jan →
nuke	13–6	0.01	13%	28 Jan →
nuke	13–11	0.01	21%	28 Jan →
dust2	13–10	0.05	17%	28 Jan →
dust2	7–13	0.00	14%	27 Jan →
overpass	13–6	-0.02	8%	27 Jan →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	11%	26 Jan →
dust2	15–15	-0.06	18%	26 Jan →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	15%	26 Jan →
dust2	16–13	0.07	15%	26 Jan →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	16%	26 Jan →
dust2	16–12	-0.02	11%	25 Jan →
mirage	13–4	0.03	12%	25 Jan →
mirage	9–13	0.01	11%	25 Jan →
nuke	6–13	-0.04	18%	24 Jan →
overpass	13–5	0.03	4%	24 Jan →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	11%	24 Jan →
ancient	15–15	-0.04	16%	24 Jan →
nuke	13–8	0.09	13%	24 Jan →
mirage	10–13	0.01	19%	24 Jan →
inferno	9–13	0.03	10%	24 Jan →
inferno	13–2	0.10	8%	23 Jan →
mirage	16–13	0.03	9%	23 Jan →
nuke	6–2	-0.00	21%	23 Jan →